By the way, I missed part of the presentation, did at any point they show any 3D movement? I saw the painting and the ball kicking, and the little kid, but that was all done on a 2D plane, was there anything in 3D. Otherwise its not really as advnaced as I thought it would be...

The tech does look pretty amazing, but I would love to have seen some examples of it in a game, rather than in some random applications. I cant say I care much for interacting with an AI boy on a personal level, or for painting really, really, REALLY badly with my hands, what I would have liked to have seen was some actual gaming use!

[QUOTE="QuirkyUsername"]Sweet Jesus, 17 pages and people are still responding to this guy? No wonder this place is so infested with trolls.finalfantasy94

I know I thought this joke of athread would be locked already. Come on Mods do your job.

You mean you don't enjoy having a good argument with deluded people? I think its all rather enjoyable...

While Halo is a competent shooter, its really nothing special, and despite what you think didn't really bring anything new to the genre. As for better shooters:

Pre Halo - Half Life + Mods (CS + TF especially), Goldeneye, Timesplitters, Quake 3, Deus Ex

Post Halo - Half Life 2 + Mods (CS:S + TF2 especially... didn't see that one coming), CoD 4, Killzone 2, Resistance 2, im sure there is more but that is enough to proove my point.

As for popularity, remember, popular =\= good. Also if its a war of popularity then im willing to bet large sums of money that Counter Strike has had a lot more games played than Halo.

of all my frnds im the worst at fps games and most of them dont have a console at all any tips to help me be better at fps beside the obivous play more lolsrdjan311

I think im pretty good at FPS games in general, and a top tip from me would be to lower your horizontal sensitivity. I was part of a little league we ran for CoD4 and i was the only person who used low sensitivity for that, and i won by some margin. Other than that, practice makes perfect, you will find some FPS games will come naturally, some will require work. Call of Duty has always come naturally to me, whereas i picked up Resistance 2 and could only get about 1.5:1 on the kills/death ratio.

I dont understand the structure of the multiplayer in COD . I understand how it works but I dont get WHY they did this.

Anyone else think you should all have the same bullet damage and health and not drop grenades etc when you die ??

I love COD but everytime I play multiplayer I shake my head at WTF they were thinking. It would be more fun if you equipped the weapons you liked right from the start and found the odd "power weapon" or sniper rifle in the game at random ( always changing ) spots.

I dont think all these perks do anything positive for the gameplay . What do you guys think ??

Weedwaka

Well i would consider myself pretty darn good at CoD4, and to me you dont need to level up past level 3, because the best all round combination is:

AK-47 w/ red dot sight (AK available on start, dot sight after like 3 half decent rounds), Stopping Power and Deep Impact (available at start), and the third perk doesnt really matter, i always had 3x frag (which does need levelling up) but then i used frags a lot.

none of this helped me out.

I said the ps3 auto set it self at 1080p on a 32in sony tv thats 720p. when I turn it on, it says 1080p HD

and I said I try to set the sound with the normal cables and I could not hear anything with them.please help.

Red_Matt

Well you didnt really ask a question about the video, just posted a statement. If the PS3 is displaying 1080p, and you can see it on your TV, then your TV supports a 1080p signal, which most likely means it is a 1080p TV. I havent come accross TVs that will downscale a 1080p signal into 720p.

Anywho, there is no point in complaining. If the PS3 is showing 1080p, and your TV displays it, then all is good.

TRUST ME I'M WAITING EAGERLIER THAN U :dfatboy_1990

Eagerlier? English FTW!!!