Legs, Face and Breasts. There was a girl like that in my high school :P

Anakin, the little critter in the first episode, seems to be a 6-8 year old, nice helpful kid. Padme, the Chancellor, seems to be in her 20s.

And they get married in the second episode...

Does anyone else find this... wrong? Pretty big difference in my opinion :D

Or maybe I'm just being childish :P

[QUOTE="SkullShooter17"]

[QUOTE="Wasdie"]

I've played Battlefield since 1942. Single player has a place, it's just never been fully realized.

Wasdie

You're 69 years old?

:P

Todd has a very good point. Single Player in BC2 wasn't very interesting, it was basically like a movie in which you had to do things to get past. You couldn't change anything. Heck this might be the case with most FPS games, but until the genre gets games with more than one ending, or actual decision making, I won't really be into it.

Alternate endings and decision making that effects the story is difficult to do and requires a whole different subset of skills in writing and level design to pull off. Bascially it's beyond what DICE is capable of if BC1, BC2, and Mirror's Edge are any indication of their skills.

However I do hope they take a note from BC1 and give the player a bit more freedom and choice along with scripted enviroments. BC1 on the 360 and PS3 played much more closely to Crysis than any other console shooter. It didn't have the depth, but it did allow you to approach objectives with mulitple weapons, vehicles, and in multiple directions. It gave a great sense of scale to the levels and felt much more like a proper Battlefield game. BC2, while fun, was pretty much a direct attempt to copy CoD in every way possible.

While this is looking pretty damn scripted already, I'll have to wait until people get their hands on real levels of the game as the initial gameplay is going to go for the "wow" factor before anything else and scripted events are probably the best way to capture that.

I do agree that it would be very difficult to pull something like this off, but then again I'm not asking for it. I just don't need single player, and probably won't like it. The game will be worth it for multiplayer alone.

Crysis 2 is also somewhere on my wishlist. Getting lots of hate, but I just have something for it. Big year for EA(and yes I know this is off topic :P).

[QUOTE="FelipeInside"]

And I thought Battlefield 3 looked good....

dakan45

LOL!!!!!!!! :D

Ask your parents to show you Pulp Fiction :P

[QUOTE="THA-TODD-BEAST"]

[QUOTE="Wasdie"]

How else you going to do the single player? Make it as boring and broken as ArmA 2?

Wasdie

The point is that single-player doesn't belong in a Battlefield game, because "Battlefield" from the beginning has been about loads of players battling it out online with large maps littered with vehicles ranging from boats to tanks to planes. The series has gone in the direction of Call of Duty and Medal of Honor, it seems, because they're opting to show footage of single-player which makes no sense at all to me. It's no different than taking a game like, say, Counter Strike and creating a sequel, then showing single-player footage. Any true Battlefield fan would desperately want to see how the game will look and play online, because I know one thing for certain: I will not play the cruddy single-player campaign. I can see from these videos alone that it's the same "move into an area, kill enemies that magically appear, proceed" type of ordeal that every other Call of Duty clone and even Bad Company 2 falls for. And this type of gameplay is exactly what's wrong with the industry.

I'm starting to feel like I'm surrounded by hordes of Battlefield virgins.

I've played Battlefield since 1942. Single player has a place, it's just never been fully realized.

You're 69 years old?

:P

Todd has a very good point. Single Player in BC2 wasn't very interesting, it was basically like a movie in which you had to do things to get past. You couldn't change anything. Heck this might be the case with most FPS games, but until the genre gets games with more than one ending, or actual decision making, I won't really be into it.

crytek should have used cryengine2 for this game, its a nightmare for me at this point all my hopes for this game are ruined by the watered down graphics

chris24l

Cryengine 3 looks a lot better than 2...

Oh and does anyone know the name of this track? I'm dying to get the full version.

Well I finally got some proper time with the demo, and my opinion has changed.

The engine is beautiful. I think it's safe to say that the game runs better and looks greater than the 2.0 Cryengine. The gameplay is not as fluid. It doesn't feel right. But. BUT. I liked it. I don't know why, but I did. It just felt... interesting. The environments and graphics are amazing, which also makes it more enjoyable playing the actual game.

Other than that, I don't know what else to say. Mixed reactions. Didn't love it, didn't hate it. Looks great though.

The motion blur is really pissing me off. They really need to ease down on that.

[QUOTE="alexside1"]Damn it one thing to be mad and another to hit your friend with a keyboard.mercenaryy

Nope. I am Russian, and can guarantee you, that we are capable of doing such things :D

Fake or not, it wasn't funny.Crimsader

Cheer up mate :D