[QUOTE="SLIisaownsystem"]

[QUOTE="cowgriller"]

no. the gtx is only 5% better at actual gameplay than the 5870 according to demo given by nvidia themselves. and that's under the best situations, for the most part, it matched the 5870. as for tessellation, nvidia, in the same demo showed that i performed twice as well as the 5870. that's great. unfortunately they left out the part that the program they used only benchmarks tessellation. nothing else. not even realworld gaming. that test was pure bs because the gtx 470 and 480 both use their shader processors to perform tessellation whereas the 5870, hell all ati cards since the x1000 series have dedicated tessellators. this means that when you play a game that has tons of shaders and tessellation, you see performance issues on the gtx 480 or performance equal to the 5870 rather than "twice the performance of the competitor" bs that nvidia is selling. to make things worse, nvidia has incredibly low yields and are selling the card for $600 (down from the original $700). for that price, one can purchase the 5970 and have theoretically twice the performance of the 5870 with a lower power consumption and better cooling.

link

cowgriller

NO

wow. what a very compelling argument you put up. :roll: and so well thought out and full of fact. :roll:

btw, i forgot to mention one more fun fact that shows that nvidia is full of ---- with the gtx 480. the unigine heaven demo that they used to demonstrate the tessellation ability of the gtx 480 is not available to the public. they are using version 1.1 which is modified to have nv 3D vision surround. everyone else only gets version 1.0 meaning the 1.1 that nvidia has could have more modifications than just 3d vision surround.

edit:

yep. heaven 1.1 has a 30% performance increase over 1.0 so sayeth one of the creators. link

what this says is that the GTX 480 is the FX5800 2.0.

my no is more relevant than your blind posts, give one single proof that the gtx 480 is going to be like 600 dollar and even the video of Tom shows that its much more than 5% its an up from 20 to 40 average just see the benchmarks. There are even rumors that the 470 could beat the 5870 but i still dont say them as facts i just wait until fermi is really out.

dont care i am vaccinated against it since last year

[QUOTE="SLIisaownsystem"]

Mirrors Edge really looks at some moments like real life thx to the great textures, physx and also great animations (with crysis its the only game that shows the feet of the character this gen), i just miss motion blur.

[QUOTE="hakanakumono"]

Heavy Rain looks better.

MC3887

no are you joking? And its a movie game like fahrenheit.

I think halo 3 does that as well.

yeah but its halo

Mirrors Edge really looks at some moments like real life thx to the great textures, physx and also great animations (with crysis its the only game that shows the feet of the character this gen), i just miss motion blur.

Heavy Rain looks better.

hakanakumono

no are you joking? And its a movie game like fahrenheit.

[QUOTE="Nonstop-Madness"]

[QUOTE="cowgriller"]

actually, early report and test indicate that the 480 is weaker than the 5970 and that it consumes 300 Watts, is very large and generates an excessive amount of heat, meaning no dual gpu cards like a 495 ever. currently, the card is priced at $700 on preorder at CDW. furthermore, the gtx 480 is said to be at most, only 5% faster than the 5870.

the RSX is also weaker than the Xenos. as another poster mention, it is a verfiable fact. well, if your not an nvidia fanboy whose avatar is "SLI is a own systen".

cowgriller

NVIDIA will release a 495 in the near future, I can guarantee you. The GTX 480 is much better than the 5870 at tessellation and thats the main reason to get a DX11 graphics card.

no. the gtx is only 5% better at actual gameplay than the 5870 according to demo given by nvidia themselves. and that's under the best situations, for the most part, it matched the 5870. as for tessellation, nvidia, in the same demo showed that i performed twice as well as the 5870. that's great. unfortunately they left out the part that the program they used only benchmarks tessellation. nothing else. not even realworld gaming. that test was pure bs because the gtx 470 and 480 both use their shader processors to perform tessellation whereas the 5870, hell all ati cards since the x1000 series have dedicated tessellators. this means that when you play a game that has tons of shaders and tessellation, you see performance issues on the gtx 480 or performance equal to the 5870 rather than "twice the performance of the competitor" bs that nvidia is selling. to make things worse, nvidia has incredibly low yields and are selling the card for $600 (down from the original $700). for that price, one can purchase the 5970 and have theoretically twice the performance of the 5870 with a lower power consumption and better cooling.

link

NO

i have no problems playing as females, but imo are tomb raider and metrious prime how ever boring. Also bayonetta looks crappy this freaking main dont appeal to me. Other games like Sh3 or Mirrors Edge work really well with females.

resolution doesnt matter, get a 120 Hertz Monitor its so much faster for gaming.

[QUOTE="SLIisaownsystem"]

[QUOTE="SparkyProtocol"]RSX is factually weaker than Xenos. :lol: Keep your Nvidia fanboyism out of it.Bus-A-Bus

Dude did you ever played Uncharted 2 it smashes everything to dust that Xbox has to offer

Xenos is more then 30% better,there i said it.Especially when fully optimized(EDRAm framebuffer,memexport)

no it doesnt, Xenos laggs on memory it has only 10 mb even my PSone memory card has more. RSX is just a strong as 2 6800 Ultras in SLI.

RSX is factually weaker than Xenos. :lol: Keep your Nvidia fanboyism out of it.SparkyProtocol

Dude did you ever played Uncharted 2 it smashes everything to dust that Xbox has to offer