Joel McHale treated the awards show with the proper amount of disdain it was due.

@J_Dangerously "There were a couple of key issues that we wanted to address, namely that it's near impossible to write a single review that caters to everyone"

Here's the first part of the sentence, which you apparently didn't read. Multiple reviews exist to showcase multiple opinions and to deal with the fact that some games change over time. It's not just for the second.

@J_Dangerously "There were a couple of key issues that we wanted to address, namely that it's near impossible to write a single review that caters to everyone"

Here's the first part of the sentence, which you apparently didn't read. Multiple reviews exist to showcase multiple opinions and to deal with the fact that some games change over time. It's not just for the second.

I'd agree that it's not particularly big news.

On the other hand, if the One starts failing on a scale similar to the 360 at launch, we might just see if this type of thing is actually enforceable.

" We are also designing it so you can play games"

And that's the gist of the this whole reveal, wasn't it?

A politician should never criticize someone for acting in their own self-interest.

@blueinheaven @rasputin177

You can't review a game in a vacuum. So the fact that Baldur's Gate was a great game for the time doesn't mean that a supposedly enhanced version of Baldur's Gate is exempt from the progress made in Baldur's Gate 2 or any later RPGs. That, combined with a massive load of unnecessary bugs, leads to a understandably lower score than the original.

@FPS1337

The Indoctrination Theory is based entirely on wishing that the ending wasn't real. Everything else is confirmation bias.