The differences are so mild anyone arguing which systems graphics are better is wasting their time. Besides, these graphics are aging. Just try comparing Fallout on either console to the PC version.

"Contrary to what some may think, PC gaming is far from dead. In addition to sharing a lot of blockbuster titles found on consoles, the PC has its fair share of exclusive games that can't be found on any console." QFT. Nothing new to me but thank you Gamespot, there are a lot of readers that for some reason think PC gaming is dead. There also are a lot of gamers that will spend $600-$800 on a modern computer (at least 2GB of RAM, at least a duo core CPU and a PCI-express slot on the mobo),and won't use their PC for games. When they are just 1 video card away from getting their modern PC to blow away their PS3 or 360.

Where is Oblivion?

No Rhino? Even if you tried that's like essential O_O. LoL, not a bad feature though.

GoW 1 is a somewhat outclassed by Chains of Olympus, and defiantly by GOW2. They all still look amazing though. Can't wait for GOW3, to push the PS3.

AMD is nice.. But their new stuff isn't outdoing Intel's old stuff. No thanks.

Wow... basically this game can run maxed and smoothly on a midranged system. And 8800GT's are so cheap :) Awesomness.

Meh I'm a Vista owner, but with Crysis I don't see this leap of DX10 over 9. Wanna see a leap? Take Half Life 2 in DX9 mode then force it to DX8 or even 7.

Holy wow, Halo 1 looks like a PS2 game. And Halo 2 looks soooo much better. Halo 3 obviously looks amazing for 360 (accept for when you compare it to Bioshock).

GeForce 8800 GTS 640MB ftw. Hoping while OC'd it runs UT3 maxed out at atleast 1024x640 rez w/o any hitches :)