NuclearFlower's forum posts

Avatar image for NuclearFlower
NuclearFlower

575

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

2

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#1 NuclearFlower
Member since 2010 • 575 Posts

i don't really get the "no one cares" comments.this is really interesting.you guys suck.

VaguelyTagged
It's just a bunch of immature teenagers trying to be 'edgy'. Just ignore them.
Avatar image for NuclearFlower
NuclearFlower

575

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

2

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#2 NuclearFlower
Member since 2010 • 575 Posts
Pleasantly surprised with this game. It's everything Far Cry 2 should have been. I played it all night and didn't do one main mission; there's so many distractions that make the game ridiculously addicting. And on top of that, there's actually a FOV slider...in a Ubisoft game. Hell has frozen over.
Avatar image for NuclearFlower
NuclearFlower

575

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

2

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#3 NuclearFlower
Member since 2010 • 575 Posts

Far Cry 3 on PC blows away the console versions.

.RyviusARC

NO WAI!!

In other news: WATER IS WET! :o

Who woulda thought?

Avatar image for NuclearFlower
NuclearFlower

575

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

2

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#4 NuclearFlower
Member since 2010 • 575 Posts

[QUOTE="II_Seraphim_II"][QUOTE="casualU"]far cry just feels super cheesey without crytek making it.Ballroompirate

Ummm...FarCry 1 is the cheesiest of all the Farcrys lol.

How dare you....

It really was. I uninstalled it after a couple of hours. I don't get what the hype was all about. It was boring as sh*t, and Jack Carver's voice over is the most laughably embarrassing thing I've ever heard in a game. I thought it was a joke.

Far Cry Instincts is the only Far Cry I've ever enjoyed.

Avatar image for NuclearFlower
NuclearFlower

575

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

2

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#5 NuclearFlower
Member since 2010 • 575 Posts
F*ck. Max Payne 3 is 15 bucks. I said to myself I'd buy it if it goes under 20, but now I'm still having doubts. I'm afraid it's like 6 hours long and I'll never play it again. I'm cheap as f*ck.
Avatar image for NuclearFlower
NuclearFlower

575

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

2

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#6 NuclearFlower
Member since 2010 • 575 Posts
The IGN 'review' is one of the worst reviews I've ever seen.
Avatar image for NuclearFlower
NuclearFlower

575

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

2

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#7 NuclearFlower
Member since 2010 • 575 Posts

[QUOTE="NuclearFlower"]

[QUOTE="DarkLink77"]

Gamearena's review

It's harsh, but it's really hard to disagree with anything that he's said based on what we've seen. Dude makes some good point (though I disagree that the series didn't evolve under Bungie, especially in terms of multiplayer. That's kind of a silly thing to say).

Still, worth a read.

The most interesting critique to me was about the fact that Halo 4 is trying to introduce aspects of the extended fiction (Cortana's Rampancy, the increased focus on the Forerunners) into the game, and that, because this is the first time it's ever been mentioned in the games, it feels incredibly forced. This isn't the first time I'd heard this.

343 keeps saying that you won't need to understand the expanded fiction to enjoy Halo 4's story, but it doesn't seem to be true, given the fact that more than a few reviewers have said that they're basically forcing it down your throat.

DarkLink77

"...for reasons I can't fathom. In a match of Infinity Slayer (Team Deathmatch) - where the goal sees each team race to 600 points, the points earned by each player on each team at the end of the game added up to 980 to 900. Obviously the game was only adding points for kills - but why? Why have us race to a point total when we're really counting kills?"

Stopped reading right there. How can anyone be that clueless? It's Slayer, why would anything other than kills count?

Because the scoring system is based on points now, and not kills, AKA Call of Duty?

Since when do assist points, extra points for headshots and the like count towards your team's overall score in CoD Team deathmatch? DEATHMATCH, the score is soley off kills. That's basic common sense.

Avatar image for NuclearFlower
NuclearFlower

575

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

2

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#8 NuclearFlower
Member since 2010 • 575 Posts

Gamearena's review

It's harsh, but it's really hard to disagree with anything that he's said based on what we've seen. Dude makes some good point (though I disagree that the series didn't evolve under Bungie, especially in terms of multiplayer. That's kind of a silly thing to say).

Still, worth a read.

The most interesting critique to me was about the fact that Halo 4 is trying to introduce aspects of the extended fiction (Cortana's Rampancy, the increased focus on the Forerunners) into the game, and that, because this is the first time it's ever been mentioned in the games, it feels incredibly forced. This isn't the first time I'd heard this.

343 keeps saying that you won't need to understand the expanded fiction to enjoy Halo 4's story, but it doesn't seem to be true, given the fact that more than a few reviewers have said that they're basically forcing it down your throat.

DarkLink77

"...for reasons I can't fathom. In a match of Infinity Slayer (Team Deathmatch) - where the goal sees each team race to 600 points, the points earned by each player on each team at the end of the game added up to 980 to 900. Obviously the game was only adding points for kills - but why? Why have us race to a point total when we're really counting kills?"

Stopped reading right there. How can anyone be that clueless? It's Slayer, why would anything other than kills count?

Avatar image for NuclearFlower
NuclearFlower

575

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

2

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#10 NuclearFlower
Member since 2010 • 575 Posts
[QUOTE="kuraimen"] What if it turns out to be true??

I'll continue playing multiplayer. Who plays Halo for the campaign anyways? The only really good one was Halo 2. CE was fun, but mindless with no story and repetitive level design. ODST was actually not bad, just short. 3 and Reach were downright atrocious and laughable.