I played the closed alpha testing and I usually have about 30fps with all visuals to max excluding anti-aliasing and possibly v-sync. It's alpha testing, so the finished product with obviously run better, but it ran incredibly well for what it was. Ran on Core i5 2500k, GTX 680 and 16GBs RAM.
ZombieU is an excellent game if action/adventure/survival horror is a genre you enjoy. Don't pay attention to the "reviews" it's been given. The atmosphere is absolutely creepy and enveloping. It draws you into the game fairly well. Graphics are good too, probably 7.5-8/10, especially the rain. Game kind of took me back to some of my old Resident Evil days.
Even with my "argument" being waged below I have a Wii U Deluxe, and with the cheap hardware aside, it's a good console. The OS taking up the majority of memory on the Basic really isn't a problem. You can get a 32GB SDHC card on Newegg for around $20 right now with all the deals. Probably even less for some of the cheaper brands.
I'd say that investing a ton of money in development and manufacturing for a "top of the line" console not knowing how it will profit, be it short or long run, a hefty risk that Nintendo obviously isn't up to taking. The Xbox is a media hub and it has Kinect where PS has Move. Just some examples.
I'm not going to repeat the point that you missed so go ahead and read it again till you get it.
And no, my "argument" did not lose validity simply because I refuse to read some fanboys' dribble when what I said is nothing short of smack in the face obvious.
Funny reading the comments of people defending Nintendo's obviously subpar and poor design of the Wii U's hardware. Nintendo's primary concern is profit, so they put CHEAP hardware in the Wii U. Companies want to make money, that's why they're in business, but it's sad when they're painfully obvious about sacrificing quality just to turn a fast and easy profit, which smacks everybody who bought the Wii U right in the face.
I never by handhelds and now I wish I would of stuck to that. I bought this thinking they were going to keep it around and make games for it. This is why I never buy Nintendo products and I probably never will again.
Battlefield 3 is better, hands down and end of story. Campaign is pretty good, despite what people say. It isn't the best, but it isn't crap either. But the online... there is no comparing CoD to BF with online cause CoD lost that argument way before either game was released. Dice extensively updates and upgrades their engine and games fairly often, way more than CoD with it's engine created in 1999 and just modified a bit after every couple games that use it. Pretty much literally the SAME game over and over with different skins and such... and it's the best selling game in history... wow. What is that saying for CoD fanboys? It's saying you're clueless tools and money machines that Activision is taking full advantage of.
NorwegianWinter's comments