[QUOTE="Arbiterisl33t69"]Yet the cutscenes are all in-game..skrat_01Re rendered in realtime. Like Starcraft 2. There is a difference folks. in starcraft 2 the cutscenes are in the size of my room, you never see a openworld cutscenes maby one or 2 and all of them have 2D backround its like a quest games with good graphics but all is fake. in halo the cutsense are render huge world and also they are realy real time like mass effect, you will see your armor and your own spartan. so yes this is very diffrent from SC2
Nisim19's forum posts
[QUOTE="Nisim19"]
[QUOTE="FriendlyGaimz"]Fact Halo looks bland and generic and has average graphics. Fact lems claim oh 50 AI whatever amazing! Fact lems bashed cows for hyping things like MAG out of tech features alone. Fact lems are doing the exact same thing with a bad looking game. toast_burner
how you can call this bad looking?
This is gameplay
and it doesnt look that good
real time and the gameplay looks amzing also (the scale and view is amzing)Fact Halo looks bland and generic and has average graphics. Fact lems claim oh 50 AI whatever amazing! Fact lems bashed cows for hyping things like MAG out of tech features alone. Fact lems are doing the exact same thing with a bad looking game. FriendlyGaimz
how you can call this bad looking?
too bad that the game looks like **** and the texture looks like HALO 2 textures and evrey one that played R2 know that (read reviews)Why should Halo reach be impressive to anyone? what's all this BS about "tech"?
60 AI? Huge Scale? and still limited to only 16 players online with less than standard HD resolution graphics for output...were supposed to be impressed?
You lemmings just think it's something impressive because there's never been anything like that on the 360. So xbox360 is just now accomplishing what aPS3 gameswere doing in 2008, good going lemmings you should be proud?
hard_body79
Log in to comment