Niner_Empire's forum posts

Avatar image for Niner_Empire
Niner_Empire

43

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

1

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#1 Niner_Empire
Member since 2008 • 43 Posts

[QUOTE="Niner_Empire"][QUOTE="allnamestaken"]The point is, money needs to start moving again. Government redistribution will get it moving again. Creating money out of thin air, not a good idea, but when the top economic advisers in the country, both on the Republican side and on the Democratic side, believe a stimulus package is what is best for the economy. I'll take there advice. If you want to go the other way with this argument though, and base it on ideological terms I still believe that government intervention is important to stabilize and correct an economy.allnamestaken

if people have more of their own money, then it will move since it wont be so tight. No it wont get it moving again, because its never worked before. Jimmy Carter failed miserably and thats why he never got re-elected. I wont take their advice, because I realize how inept they are. why do you believe that? Do you simply believe it justs because, or is there a particular reason, and are you open to the idea that you may be wrong?

You should be the one having to prove expert economists are wrong on this issue not I, proving why they're right. And ofcourse I'm open to the idea that I may be wrong, I don't know every fact on the U.S. economy, so I trust experts. Maybe your analysis may be incorrect?

Ideologically though, I don't believe either of us is right, it's all about who spends the money, and is a matter of opinion. Personally, I like having the government there as a safety net.

I dont need anything other than to point out our current situation to prove theyre wrong. Theres no human being, or group of human beings smart enough to plan an econonomy. It just dosent work, many nations fell or stagnate because of it. I do think I am right. I believe that if you want a safety net, then you should be entitled to one but you shouldnt be allowed to vote away MY property (in this case, money) Free markets can provide many different types of insurance policies, but in a truly free market it wouldnt necesarrily be needed.
Avatar image for Niner_Empire
Niner_Empire

43

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

1

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#2 Niner_Empire
Member since 2008 • 43 Posts
The point is, money needs to start moving again. Government redistribution will get it moving again. Creating money out of thin air, not a good idea, but when the top economic advisers in the country, both on the Republican side and on the Democratic side, believe a stimulus package is what is best for the economy. I'll take there advice. If you want to go the other way with this argument though, and base it on ideological terms I still believe that government intervention is important to stabilize and correct an economy.allnamestaken
if people have more of their own money, then it will move since it wont be so tight. No it wont get it moving again, because its never worked before. Jimmy Carter failed miserably and thats why he never got re-elected. I wont take their advice, because I realize how inept they are. why do you believe that? Do you simply believe it justs because, or is there a particular reason, and are you open to the idea that you may be wrong?
Avatar image for Niner_Empire
Niner_Empire

43

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

1

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

Avatar image for Niner_Empire
Niner_Empire

43

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

1

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#4 Niner_Empire
Member since 2008 • 43 Posts
gotta respect the 'foil
Avatar image for Niner_Empire
Niner_Empire

43

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

1

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#5 Niner_Empire
Member since 2008 • 43 Posts
that's BS, he's been a top 3 quarterback all season......but then again, its the pro bowl. Rivers should be glad that he wasn't invited to participate in that garbagesilky_smooth8
i agree. the pro bowl is a joke
Avatar image for Niner_Empire
Niner_Empire

43

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

1

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#6 Niner_Empire
Member since 2008 • 43 Posts
i hope you guys realize that nothing obama can do matters as much as bernanke's decisions. monetary policy is what we should be scared of right now, not fiscal.lilburtonboy748
this is very true.
Avatar image for Niner_Empire
Niner_Empire

43

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

1

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#7 Niner_Empire
Member since 2008 • 43 Posts
[QUOTE="Niner_Empire"]

[QUOTE="allnamestaken"] So.. you post... a ... link ... to ... You...tube... as .... proof...allnamestaken

Would you rather text, possibly from the mises institute? Honestly though, the video is good. If you can discredit it, then id love to hear your argument. But I seriously doubt you have any interest in watching it, but rather try to prove me wrong in anyway that you can concieve. That isnt intellectual.

Also, the video is meant to explain Keynesian economics. I know most people arent interested in reading especially since it hurts your eyes when doing so on the computer.

No, I'd prefer a link to a reputable source. However, of course running never ending deficits is bad, is that what you're trying to prove? but this is about economic stimulus, you're missing the point and trying to shoehorn in different political ideas.

Actually everything ive posted so far was completely relevant, and if you cant see that then im sorry. I dont really have the time, nor the will to sit down and explain how the economy works to you. I suggest you do some reading. That is a fine source, if you think its bad then you should be able to disprove it. All it does is explain our current economic system and why it dosent work. So, if you know everything like you imply, disproving it should be relatively easy for you. But youd rather try and make this about the source rather than the material which makes it pretty clear of your intentions (trying to win the argument, not necessarily advance your own ideas)
Avatar image for Niner_Empire
Niner_Empire

43

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

1

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#8 Niner_Empire
Member since 2008 • 43 Posts
[QUOTE="Niner_Empire"]

[QUOTE="allnamestaken"] I'm really not trying to be offensive, my brain isn't working at full capacity for some reason tonight, But if I recall, all you've said in this thread is that we should cut taxes and that it's sad how the people who complained about Bush's spending have now voted Obama into office. First off, can you show me proof or evidence that cutting taxes would benefit the economy in any significant way? Maybe people would just hoard the money instead of spending it like we would need to get the economy moving again. I have not looked over Obama's economic plan thoroughly, but from what I hear alot of spending will be put into things like infrastructure and schools, this spending will not only improve communities, but is sure to be spent, unlike the extra money people may save on tax cuts. Secondly, I think you'd find Democrats disliked Bush not necessarily because he spent money, but in the ways he spent it. Like the war for instance.allnamestaken

Actually, I was talking about how Obama wants to give people all this money in a stimulus package, and I was saying that it would be easier to just cut the same amount of money out of taxes. This way it saves money on paper and such. I was also talking about how people complained about Bush's spending, even though Obama isnt going to change anything, and for all we know he might end up spending more. If youre going to cut taxes, then people with more money are more likely to spend. If they hoard the money thats fine too, because they usually use banks, which benefits the economy. Unfortunately, most of what Obama wants is just government funded things, which never really brings about good results. I mean, our education system is bad because of the fact that its all government run. We spend more money per kid than any nation in the world too, so I dont expect the typical "theres not enough money" argument. Most other socialized schools in the world at least have the ability to close down, ours on the other hand dont for the most part. In short, government is rarely, if ever the solution to the economic woes of a society. If anything, the government is the problem. Democrats hated Bush because he was a republican. the same could be said for the opposite. Democrats just found reasons to vocalize.

Edit:

I forgot to point out that if one believes that this stimulus package would work, then obviously a tax relief would as well. Giving people back their money is... well giving back their money. Its just a matter of finding the right way to do it.

From the article:

"Obama is promoting a recovery plan that would feature spending on roads and other infrastructure projects, energy-efficient government buildings, new and renovated schools and environmentally friendly technologies.

There would also be some form of tax relief, according to the Obama team, which is well aware of the political difficulty of pushing such a large package through Congress, even in a time of recession. Any tax cuts would be aimed at middle- and lower-income taxpayers, and aides have said there would be no tax increases for wealthy Americans."

It sounds alot like he will be spending money on infrastructure as well as giving people a tax break. It's pretty clear you're arguing off of nothing, but blind ideological belief.

like i said, its easier to cut the taxes in the first place. We dont need the federal government to deal with roads, we have the states to take care of that. We dont need renovated schools, we need teachers who arent part of a union that will actually teach. If hes going to spend money, he needs to get it from somewhere, especially if he wants to start new government programs that dont curently exist, such as universal healthcare. If hes renovating buildings such as schools and government buildings, then he needs to get the money from somewhere. Like you said though, your brain isnt working right now.
Avatar image for Niner_Empire
Niner_Empire

43

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

1

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#9 Niner_Empire
Member since 2008 • 43 Posts

[QUOTE="Niner_Empire"][QUOTE="THE_BRUTALIZER"] haha no.....we dont. we borrow and dont return. we are screwed. its called deficit spending.allnamestaken
its actually called keynesian economics. its a completely failed system. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VoxDyC7y7PM

So.. you post... a ... link ... to ... You...tube... as .... proof...

Would you rather text, possibly from the mises institute? Honestly though, the video is good. If you can discredit it, then id love to hear your argument. But I seriously doubt you have any interest in watching it, but rather try to prove me wrong in anyway that you can concieve. That isnt intellectual.

Also, the video is meant to explain Keynesian economics. I know most people arent interested in reading especially since it hurts your eyes when doing so on the computer.

Avatar image for Niner_Empire
Niner_Empire

43

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

1

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#10 Niner_Empire
Member since 2008 • 43 Posts

[QUOTE="Niner_Empire"][QUOTE="allnamestaken"] "its pretty sad that the same people who complained about bush spending elected this guy" Sorry, I got you confused with Brutalizer. Still, no offence, but you don't know what you're talking about.allnamestaken
Of course I do. I do think that you dont have any idea what im talking about though.

I'm really not trying to be offensive, my brain isn't working at full capacity for some reason tonight, But if I recall, all you've said in this thread is that we should cut taxes and that it's sad how the people who complained about Bush's spending have now voted Obama into office. First off, can you show me proof or evidence that cutting taxes would benefit the economy in any significant way? Maybe people would just hoard the money instead of spending it like we would need to get the economy moving again. I have not looked over Obama's economic plan thoroughly, but from what I hear alot of spending will be put into things like infrastructure and schools, this spending will not only improve communities, but is sure to be spent, unlike the extra money people may save on tax cuts. Secondly, I think you'd find Democrats disliked Bush not necessarily because he spent money, but in the ways he spent it. Like the war for instance.

Actually, I was talking about how Obama wants to give people all this money in a stimulus package, and I was saying that it would be easier to just cut the same amount of money out of taxes. This way it saves money on paper and such. I was also talking about how people complained about Bush's spending, even though Obama isnt going to change anything, and for all we know he might end up spending more. If youre going to cut taxes, then people with more money are more likely to spend. If they hoard the money thats fine too, because they usually use banks, which benefits the economy. Unfortunately, most of what Obama wants is just government funded things, which never really brings about good results. I mean, our education system is bad because of the fact that its all government run. We spend more money per kid than any nation in the world too, so I dont expect the typical "theres not enough money" argument. Most other socialized schools in the world at least have the ability to close down, ours on the other hand dont for the most part. In short, government is rarely, if ever the solution to the economic woes of a society. If anything, the government is the problem. Democrats hated Bush because he was a republican. the same could be said for the opposite. Democrats just found reasons to vocalize.

Edit:

I forgot to point out that if one believes that this stimulus package would work, then obviously a tax relief would as well. Giving people back their money is... well giving back their money. Its just a matter of finding the right way to do it.