if people have more of their own money, then it will move since it wont be so tight. No it wont get it moving again, because its never worked before. Jimmy Carter failed miserably and thats why he never got re-elected. I wont take their advice, because I realize how inept they are. why do you believe that? Do you simply believe it justs because, or is there a particular reason, and are you open to the idea that you may be wrong?[QUOTE="Niner_Empire"][QUOTE="allnamestaken"]The point is, money needs to start moving again. Government redistribution will get it moving again. Creating money out of thin air, not a good idea, but when the top economic advisers in the country, both on the Republican side and on the Democratic side, believe a stimulus package is what is best for the economy. I'll take there advice. If you want to go the other way with this argument though, and base it on ideological terms I still believe that government intervention is important to stabilize and correct an economy.allnamestaken
You should be the one having to prove expert economists are wrong on this issue not I, proving why they're right. And ofcourse I'm open to the idea that I may be wrong, I don't know every fact on the U.S. economy, so I trust experts. Maybe your analysis may be incorrect?
Ideologically though, I don't believe either of us is right, it's all about who spends the money, and is a matter of opinion. Personally, I like having the government there as a safety net.
I dont need anything other than to point out our current situation to prove theyre wrong. Theres no human being, or group of human beings smart enough to plan an econonomy. It just dosent work, many nations fell or stagnate because of it. I do think I am right. I believe that if you want a safety net, then you should be entitled to one but you shouldnt be allowed to vote away MY property (in this case, money) Free markets can provide many different types of insurance policies, but in a truly free market it wouldnt necesarrily be needed.
Log in to comment