LucLongleyMVP's forum posts

Avatar image for LucLongleyMVP
LucLongleyMVP

84

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#1 LucLongleyMVP
Member since 2010 • 84 Posts

[QUOTE="LucLongleyMVP"]

Crysis sold 2.5 million or more with zero advertising.

Its not nearly as black and white as you'd like to believe.

TheMISCMan48

The PC gaming industry is also MUCH more hardcore of a market. For instance, PC gamers are almost ALL fully aware of everything on their platform alot more than anyone else. Most people who take the time to build an expensive ass rig, will also take the time and effort into finding out the best games. Not saying that they are "nerds" or anything, but most of them spend alot of time on the internet, and are a very hardcore and vocal community. Console users hare different. A small majority of them belong to the hardcore gaming community, and would ever post on a forum like this. They are MUCH less aware of what their console has to offer. Most of them are parents who buy their console for their children, and most of them just buys the games that pop culture tells them to, I.E. Modern Warfare 2, Halo....... When Halo 3 came out, a buddy of mine just around the corner who is very loose with his money ran out and bought it at midnight launch. Never played a halo game in his life, and didnt even really game like that. months later, he tells me he barely even playes it, never even played the campaign more than like 30 mintues, and thought it was overhyped trash. Not saying that the quality isnt there, I fully acknowlege the game's quality, but he bought the game blindly just because friggin MTV and mountain dew told him he should.

Hardcore gamers know about every game. Hence the hardcore part. Advertising is for the casuals and KZ2 is not marketed towards casuals.

Avatar image for LucLongleyMVP
LucLongleyMVP

84

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#2 LucLongleyMVP
Member since 2010 • 84 Posts

Crysis sold 2.5 million or more with zero advertising.

Its not nearly as black and white as you'd like to believe.

Avatar image for LucLongleyMVP
LucLongleyMVP

84

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#3 LucLongleyMVP
Member since 2010 • 84 Posts

[QUOTE="millerlight89"][QUOTE="dontshackzmii"]

better graphics i guess. with move its like the mouse

dontshackzmii

No it is not like the mouse. The mouse is not a motion controller, and the mouse is more precise.

not really you point right at people with move

Move and Wiimotes are not even remotely comparable the precision of the mouse.
Avatar image for LucLongleyMVP
LucLongleyMVP

84

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#4 LucLongleyMVP
Member since 2010 • 84 Posts
All shooters that are on consoles should have a PC port.
Avatar image for LucLongleyMVP
LucLongleyMVP

84

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#5 LucLongleyMVP
Member since 2010 • 84 Posts
Trolls are the fuel that keeps SW going.
Avatar image for LucLongleyMVP
LucLongleyMVP

84

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#6 LucLongleyMVP
Member since 2010 • 84 Posts
Ryan Grant is above average and as for the Packers hype they are a legitimate playoff team at this point, but a healthy Vikings team vs a Healthy Packers id go with the Vikes every time. With Favre of course (without they don't even make the playoffs)
Avatar image for LucLongleyMVP
LucLongleyMVP

84

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#7 LucLongleyMVP
Member since 2010 • 84 Posts
Fable III has a good shot at AAA. Last game was god awful and got an 8.5 so if Fable III can fix most of the flaws from the second one its very likely.
Avatar image for LucLongleyMVP
LucLongleyMVP

84

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#8 LucLongleyMVP
Member since 2010 • 84 Posts

[QUOTE="LucLongleyMVP"][QUOTE="AtheistPreacher"]

Did you notice the Bulls' record only dropped two games the year after Jordan first retired? But then when Horace Grant left, they dropped 10 games? You think maybe, just maybe, not having an all-star power forward affected their performance?

Nooooooo. Couldn't be.

I'd also like you to explain to me why Jordan's numbers were BETTER in the playoffs in 94-95 (more points, better fg%, more rebounds, more assists) than they were the next year when they won the championship. If they only lost because Jordan was sub-par, and not because they had no star power forward, why would his stats be BETTER? Fascinating...

Dang facts! They keep getting in the way of your mindless Jordan worship!

AtheistPreacher

Jordan played 17 games in the regular season after a year long hiatus from the game. Any sane individual that being away for that long and being thrust into the playoffs will result in not being 100% (hell even Nick Anderson after stealing the ball from Jordan in game 1? Joked that MJ was playing like a 45 year old his jersey number) Ughh how are MJ's numbers better in 1994-1995.......umm less games played so the numbers are easier to inflate..........Next year he played a full playoff schedule which nearly doubled the games played. The Bulls played different teams except for the Magic both of those years. The Bulls played the Magic in the 2nd round of the playoffs and then they played them in the ECF the next year. Also no one cares about regular season stats. Using the W/L during the regular season as some kind of proof is absurd. The Magic team that beat the Bulls was virtually identical from the year before and got absolutely demolished. The year the Magic beat the Bulls the games were relatively close and then the next year 2 of the 4 games were absolute blowouts. Sorry, but Rodman is not going to turn close losses from last year to 20 point blowouts the next year. (even without the STUD ALL STAR FORWARD WHICH THE BULLS DESPERATELY NEEDED which you claim the Bulls did very well against the Magic) Its unanimously agreed by most basketball experts (not you) that the year MJ returned he was not 100%.

Hahaha. You're hilarious.

What "basketball experts?" ESPN? ESPN also says Jordan "led his team to the NCAA championship." He didn't. James Worthy did. Jordan was an also-ran on that team. Some "basketball experts." Clearly I should put my trust in what they say, not my own two eyes, which tell me the Bulls were never beating anyone without a top-tier big man.

Top Tier big man..............lol I was waiting for you to say that, lets have a look at Chicago's top tier big men. Luc Longley..............beast......im joking Bill Wennington........ The actual best big man the Bulls had who actually played defense and grabbed boards was Dennis Rodman who was a staggring 6feet 7inches tall. The Triangle system never required a big man for the team to succeed. The Bulls never had an elite big man EVER and they won 6 ships. The return year where the Bulls did not win was merely an anomaly because of M.J. not playing for over a year. I have come to the conclusion that you are either A. A Lakers fan who worships Kobe Bryant and wants him to be recognized as the GOAT B. Jazz Fan who has an unhealthy hatred for M.J. C. A Shaq fan D. Or just a Bulls hater As for that NCAA nonsense, MJ played a huge role in winning the game HE HIT THE GAME WINNER and he played great too. Jordan was a Freshmen and Worthy was a junior..............so think about it for a second Worthy got his props when he got the MVP award........honestly you make zero sense
Avatar image for LucLongleyMVP
LucLongleyMVP

84

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#9 LucLongleyMVP
Member since 2010 • 84 Posts

[QUOTE="LucLongleyMVP"][QUOTE="AtheistPreacher"]

Hahaha... hilarious excuses you make for him.

The Bulls lost because Horace Grant had left, and they didn't yet have Rodman. Not because Jordan was rusty.

AtheistPreacher

yeah............no Its pretty obvious Jordan was not 100% that season. When you sweep the team that beat you the year before its a pretty big statement.

Did you notice the Bulls' record only dropped two games the year after Jordan first retired? But then when Horace Grant left, they dropped 10 games? You think maybe, just maybe, not having an all-star power forward affected their performance?

Nooooooo. Couldn't be.

I'd also like you to explain to me why Jordan's numbers were BETTER in the playoffs in 94-95 (more points, better fg%, more rebounds, more assists) than they were the next year when they won the championship. If they only lost because Jordan was sub-par, and not because they had no star power forward, why would his stats be BETTER? Fascinating...

Dang facts! They keep getting in the way of your mindless Jordan worship!

Jordan played 17 games in the regular season after a year long hiatus from the game. Any sane individual that being away for that long and being thrust into the playoffs will result in not being 100% (hell even Nick Anderson after stealing the ball from Jordan in game 1? Joked that MJ was playing like a 45 year old his jersey number) Ughh how are MJ's numbers better in 1994-1995.......umm less games played so the numbers are easier to inflate..........Next year he played a full playoff schedule which nearly doubled the games played. The Bulls played different teams except for the Magic both of those years. The Bulls played the Magic in the 2nd round of the playoffs and then they played them in the ECF the next year. Also no one cares about regular season stats. Using the W/L during the regular season as some kind of proof is absurd. The Magic team that beat the Bulls was virtually identical from the year before and got absolutely demolished. The year the Magic beat the Bulls the games were relatively close and then the next year 2 of the 4 games were absolute blowouts. Sorry, but Rodman is not going to turn close losses from last year to 20 point blowouts the next year. (even without the STUD ALL STAR FORWARD WHICH THE BULLS DESPERATELY NEEDED which you claim the Bulls did very well against the Magic) Its unanimously agreed by most basketball experts (not you) that the year MJ returned he was not 100%.
Avatar image for LucLongleyMVP
LucLongleyMVP

84

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#10 LucLongleyMVP
Member since 2010 • 84 Posts
Its just a typo on GS. They are both coming out in September.