I'm gonna be honest, I stole this from a poster on a previous article about the new COD.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8d4DHgVBSL8

"Friends and family say the gunman spent an unusual amount of time playing violent video games at rest stops."

If it sounds stupid, it probably is.

Is misleading the right word? Maybe cryptic is. I am not sure what good a "misleading" trailer would do.

Looks more like a sequel to battlefield 3 than a sequel to the battlefield series. There is a difference. The ONLY thing the single player looks like it might have going for it is the vehicle use and fire directing, like there is no ONE way to finish a mission. Like most people though I wish they waited a few years before making this game, because I doubt it is going to be a huge leap. And if there are no mods, I will be in no rush for this.

So the only detail that is not "buy it now and..." or some marketing crap, is.......related to single player? smh

Perhaps someone can explain to me what is so lucrative about always online games?

but unfortunately we can expect bugs.

I NEVER understood all the Helghast sympathy. They were a colony that went all but rogue and tried to bully trade in their favor. When the ISA reacts, they play victim and reveal their hand: they are no longer only scheemy outlanders, but draconian, barbarian, imprealists.

Someone explain to me why this is acceptable.