ILikeCatFoodMan's forum posts
[QUOTE="-Renegade"]Yea, man it would be like shilling a ton of money for a demo ... oh wait ...[QUOTE="blue_hazy_basic"][QUOTE="-Renegade"]milkage after already paying $60 bucks for a medicore experience? not my idea of money well spent.blue_hazy_basic
At least I am enjoying it. And this demo is better then 95% of racing games out there now.
so if someone enjoys GTA how is that different Mr Renegade? oops ... :lol: owned, the fact he called it a medicore experience when we know nothing about it tells me hes just a fanboy but i`m sure everybody knew this.Why are lemmings hyping Fable 2? I mean the first one really wasn't that great at all.Ragnarok1051Check out the score on Gamerankings, then check out Flopzones score, fable was great.
[QUOTE="StringGuard"][QUOTE="kingkui"]Gameplay > Graphics
Always has always will.
CreepyBacon
Which is why MArio fo today looks just as boxy and pixelated as the mario on NES. That's why all of these console makers and developers over the past 30 years, or whatever, have improved on graphics every step of the way. That's why handhelds now have color instead of the original gameboy with black and yellow.
I hate this argument with a passion. I hate the "teh gameplay>graphics" crap. Because that's all it is. Game is a merger of vision, hearing, and interaction. They all must be there to create a satisfying experience.
Don't twist it.
What are you going on about? If a game has crappy graphics but amazing gameplay it's *still* a good game. If a game has amazing graphics but the gameplay is crap it's known as "broken". It's not fun, it's frustrating, rubbish, boring.
Gameplay>Graphics
Everytime. I've never understood why graphisc where the end all of a game, if there not good it's gotta be rubbish, it's stupid. Ninja Gaidens gameplay is what you buy a Ninja gaiden game for, no one EVER buys it for graphics.
I agree, his arguement is full of fail. Graphics to me is important but its not a lie that gameplay is in fact >>> then graphics. Besides this game has beautiful graphics, this thread is full of fail.[QUOTE="ILikeCatFoodMan"]RTS and MMOs are boring anyways.skrat_01So are fighters, jrpgs and 3D platformers :roll:
yay for opinions?
I`m not a lemming though and MGS4 does have horrible textures, never said the gameplay would be bad, the graphics of this game is fine, i dont see whats the boost about, gameplay does matter anyways. Imagine playing Gears of war equvelent to big rigs gameplay, and that guy who said Windows 95 doesnt have better graphics, im talking about as a gaming pc, doesnt disapprove the fact that pc graphics > console graphics.Funny, when MGS4 screenshots gets showed all lemmings say, "But they look terrible!" and NG2 gets posted and they all say "Gameplay first... it looks better than MGS4!"
Both games will look great, but it's funny the irony of it all.
carljohnson3456
MGS4 is not a launch game and as someone pointed out gameplay >> graphics, Wii proves this.[QUOTE="ILikeCatFoodMan"][QUOTE="Rhys555"]looks like i'll have to clear some of you...I'm not saying Sigma is better looking than NG2, the difference though is VERY small, and condiering sigma has been out over a year (probably :P) and is a near launch game compared to NG2...the graphics are very poor. MGS4 is going to overshadow this game so much on launch.Rhys555
I never said MGS4 was a launcg game and i'm not talking about gameplay. it makes me laugh though how graphics no longer become important when there inferior :lol:
In that case pc >>>>> consoles, because console graphics are inferior compared to it and you kinda did with the mgs4 launch line.
Log in to comment