I enjoyed the demo, but it took a bit. I was bored with it at the beginning but I figured what the hey I will try and go through the whole thing. After I learn alot about the combat system, and how I can customize each of my teams skills and about tension attack, I really enjoy the mechnices behind the game, but I can understand how people would get bored with it.
[QUOTE="Hidden-kazama"]The game looks like it can be really good. I have alot of high hopes for it. Oh and I am 18 and I am secure about want I like and want I dislike.ohnoez
'Want' does not equal 'What'.
Sorry, I made a typo and didn't proofread my post. I apologize for such a horrific atrocity. However, I believe my point was made.
I would love a PS3 but it is expensive. It cost about $600 for the system plus one game since the sell tax for a ps3 is kinda of high. I really haveother things I would like to spend $600 on, but here is hoping to getting a roommate with a PS3 that isn't a hog.
I have actually spent a fair bit of time on the Wii, I did get it a chance, and the general focus of the system is simply wrong *for me*. Are there going to be a few gems in the garbage heap of titles that don't appeal to me? Yes. Does that change that their focus is on the "non-gamer"? No.
My complaint is with "non-gamer" games, no necissarily with casual titles. Halo 3 is a casual title, I don't think that automatically makes it bad. However, when your *showcase games* are titles like Wii Fitness, then that raises serious questions about the direction your company is going in. When we look to Mario Kart as a "hardcore" title on a brand that used to boast Chrono Trigger, I have grave concerns.
Crystal Chronicles is not an acceptable substitute for numbered Final Fantasy titles, Wii Play is not a substitute for Mother. It's ultimately as much about what we're getting as what we're not getting.
Also of grave concern is this press conference was the confirmation that Nintendo is doing what they have said they're going to do. That means a host of other comments, such as "TP is the last Zelda game of its kind" are slated to come true. What Nintendo means by this, I can only shudder to imagnine. subrosian
Like I said before then how do you know that the "non-gamer" games will not be fun?Don't get me wrong If I had tochoose between Chrono Trigger andthe past Mario Kart games I would pick Chrono Triggereasily, but then I look at my friend who hated Chrono Trigger (still confused of how that is possible), but yet constantly wanting to race me in Mario Kart DS.
I am Kinda of confuse as to why you are stating one game is superior to anothersince that is truly opinion based. I would take Crystal Chronoicles over Final Fantasy III (the real one FFIII, not FFIV) but I would choose FFII overCrystal Chronoicles, because the what really matters is how fun the game is to the individual. I can tell you right now I would take HIIT over WiiFit for working out anyday of the week, but I may not enjoy it HIIT as much as WiiFit. Just becasue it is different doesn't mean it is bad it just means it is different.
We may not know what the next Zelda will be but that doesn't mean we should already shun it.
I have a question, actually I have a few. Why can't you enjoy "casual" gamesalong with hardcore games? Also why isNintendo not allow to target a different audience if itallows them to not only "stay alive" but also allows them tokeep making quality games? Just because a game isn't target at you doesn't mean it will be horrible to all non "hardcore" gamers outtheir. So they played a different strategy then their competition. That doesn't mean Nintendois attacking the already installed hardcore gaming base, it just means they are trying a new wayof doing thing, a way that they try and satisfy the hardcore, while bring more people in to gaming.I concedeI would prefer if they had more games that I felt was more aimed at me, but Iam only one personand they have to think about everyone. Honestly, they still have games I want coming my way, but their also have games I don't know if I want to play. Sure I can take it at face value and say looking from the trailers and the audience aim I will never like this game, but that doesn't hold true. I can't make judgement without experiening it. Sure, sometimes you have to go off of what you like and what you dislike without trying it, but that doesn't mean it is a fair opinion, it just means me has a person has other things to do than trying to create a fair opinion of everything.
I feel sony had the strongest conference, however I felt all of the conferences were lacking. All coming need to focus on the future. Sony did that the most, but they why they presented it wasn't the smoothest way either. You need to talk about why should we look forward to the future as well has this is want we are offering the future. It like a comedian will tell you. You must sell you're joke and have the attitude that this is funny, and you are going to enjoy it regardless. Microsoft and Nintendo gave a joke so to speak, but it wasn't funny, nor was their anyattitude in it. Sonygave a joke, and it was funny, but they did not have the attitude to sell it toits full potential.
I understand what you are staying, but in all fairness the only games that have proven themselves are the games that have already came out. I mean look at Halo 3, Halo 1 & 2 are considered to be some of the best experience gaming has to offer, but that doesn't mean Halo 3 will be like that. Halo 3 could very well end up sucking, but all wereally have that we can judge the game off of is the beta, and what others tell us. Hell, it evenworks for Brawl too,since we can't make a judgement until it is release, unfortunately, even then we can't say a game has proven itself, since it is all opinion based. I mean to me Shadowrun is an amazing game, it easilyis funner that Gears of War, but to other the opposite holds true.
Just because something was bad in the past doesn't mean it will automatically be horrible (Sure it doesn't mean it will be good). That is a Chanticleer Fallacy. I am not blown away by Killzone 2 trailer, but i see the that it can be very good, as long as they work out the problems they had with killzone 1.
Log in to comment