Hackerwacker's forum posts
the graphics suck on a technical level. it's the art direction that saves it.
but one still has to wonder how a game that looks liek a bad PS2 game could still get such choppy framerates on a wii : /
[QUOTE="Hackerwacker"]no. if anything this just makes nintendo look even more kid oriented than beofre. the **** at nintendo forced them to add that retarded blur filter ontop of the color distortions that were already there. STUPID.
Arkthemaniac
That wasn't Nintendo. That was the ESRB. Nintendo didn't want an AO game on their console, but they may have been able to come to a compromise.
wrong. there is even more filtering on the wiiversion than the PS2 verson. it's even morecolor distorted,plus it has an addition blur filter on top of that that isnt on the ps2
no. if anything this just makes nintendo look even more kid oriented than beofre. the **** at nintendo forced them to add that retarded blur filter ontop of the color distortions that were already there. STUPID.
Guys, we OWE it to nintendo to go out and buy this game when it is released. We need to show third parties that if they take time to make a decent gameon the wii, it WILL sell. If the wii fanbase simply ignores this game and runs out to eat up Mario Party 34, then third parties are simply going to stop making games just like on the game cube.
Log in to comment