@wolfyrabbit shouldn't you be thanking Sony for tonning down the graphics? last time I checked Sony owned PS3 not MS. so how can you blame MS if PS3 has less than anticipated graphics? also keep in mind that sony themselves said they purposely made it harder for developers to unlock the full potential of the PS3. It's entirely Sony's fault. link>> http://news.cnet.com/8301-13506_3-10173656-17.htm
"combining the MotionPlus' rotation sensing with the Wii Remote's other built-in sensors brings new gaming capabilities to Wii Sports Resort" YAY! now I can finally throw a frisbee! and twist to go forward on a jet ski. wow so exciting :S
hmmm well what gamers should learn is that. if you are expecting the best graphics then you are much better off with a PC. seriously my 3 and half year old PC does better! *sigh*
hahahahaa how ironic is that!! the X360 was constantly bashed because of PS3's apparent 4ghz processor. and they lied there and gave a 3.2 ghz. then it was how HDD and Blue-ray was needed for Next gen and now PS3 is behind X360. LMFAO!
guys this is a simple prediction for stock holders.its not the actual amount they have.but who know if Nintendo increses there production it mite be true. nice either way.
Ive always been pleased with graphics of halo. always!! I mean it may not be the best graphics at the time but its artistic style is very unique and pleasing.
Great_Ragnarok's comments