[QUOTE="Technoweirdo"]It'd save me $10 plus tax if my PC could run it. :DJade_Monkey

I dont know how good your PC is but I don't see a FF game stressing out too many systems.

Final Fantasy games tend to look very good when they come out. That and the fact that most japanese companies have insane system requirements for pc.

But it'd end up taking 30 GB though. So it's definately a console game for me even if it comes to the pc. (and besides, ff should be played on a tv). Don't get me wrong, I have 100s of GBs, but 30 GB for a game is rediculous.

yes, definitely they should release it on pc (final fantasy 7 on pc was way better than the ps1 version)delta3074

:| not even close. It got a 8.0 on pc for the record and a 9.5 on the ps1. FF8 was even worse. 9.5 on the pc and 6.7 on the pc.

Jees, I wish I could just get a reduced rate from mine and just do downloads. It's the same thing as actually getting the dvd.

the guide look awesome

[QUOTE="Gamerman12362"]I get what you're saying, it's not like it's okay to say that your preferred gaming platform is consoles when talking about a library of games. Then again though, there's like 2 mac full retail games and then what Bungie made a while back, and is there even a linux game?0gh3r

There are many Mac games, most of em' came out in the 90s though. That doesn't matter since Macs aren't made for gaming anyway, they're for those who like to code and use it's superior applications. ;)

And games are constantly being made compatible for linux like Neverwinter Nights and Baldur's Gate 2.

was that a joke or? The app. part too. Maybe if you mean what comes on it, but you can download things way better than it.

But the truth is that NWN and BG2 are very old. They're not worth mentioning.

I think the game looks crap, they really are stuck back last gen when making RPGs something needs to change, **** needs to stop being so static or something in jrpgs

bigLLL

are you serious?

Honestly, World in Conflict Soviet Assault looks much better than this. This is multiplat too and I don't understand on why this is being overlooked.

http://www.gamespot.com/xbox360/strategy/worldinconflict/index.html?tag=result;title;1

mo0ksi

Maybe I'm just a weirdo here, but to me, theme is extremely important in an RTS. Reason I like BFME2 and C&C3 over CoH.
World in Conflict, while it is unique, I just find the whole theme boring.

[QUOTE="Slick_Rican"]

How do you "undiscover" something?

bearbones

That's how.

or amnesia.

Remember how there's two guys who are twins?
The main character didn't know it. Obviously he forgot something.

Edited version sounds fine:

And during the rant it just plays the guitar

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Oz7X7cM5_mU

yes. Very good and underrated also.

Niche I guess?

Truth is though that if I get it for pc it'll probably look worse than the console versions -the gameplay vids show that, at least the the xbox version (but id imagine ps3 version as well) look up to par with the pc version. I doubt my pc can handle that max as it's going to be in the ballpark of crysis's requirements.

What am I saying? I'll just rent it. lulz. I was almost thinking about buying a cool but not ******* awesome shooter. Silly me.