Matchmaking as well. It takes me usually over 10 minutes to get a party of 6 into a pub game, in CoD4 it usually puts me in a game seconds after I search.COD 4 for me. I like the single player better (cause it makes sense), and the Multiplayer is simply more balanced (no insane knifing or extremely strong guns) unlike MW2. Also, on a side note as this hopefully will be fixed, MW2 has horrible server issues. The glitches are endless, and now there are major problems just joining a game. I've moved on or back to Call of Duty 4.
red192837465
Duqi's forum posts
[QUOTE="Duqi"]Probably because it's new. I can assure you that you won't play MW2 as long as you played CoD4.DranzarTypeFI played COD 4 for 2 years man...it had it's fair share of campers and broken gameplay, hacks were minimal because it wasn't as popular as MW2, boosting still existed, so I fail to see a "noticeable" difference when comparing the two...people are overreacting because it's the nature of us, we follow. CoD4 was fresh, new, and innovative back in 2007, MW2 is not. The camping is enhanced because of the expanded killstreak reward system, and the bigger, more "nook-n-cranny" maps make it much easier to find an undisclosed locations. SMGs are underpowered, snipers are pretty lame, and things like the increased weapon damage make the game much more casual. A player who would do poorly on CoD4 could easily find success in MW2 with the host of ways to kill people. I've hated MW2 since day 1, and by the way, to 'follow' would to be one of the millions who complacently accept MW2 and declare it a gaming maserpiece.
Log in to comment