Did they really need a Hardware Performance Guide for WoW? Come on, now, my grandma's old dinosaur PC can probably run that game with no problems.

Must...buy...all...of...Blizzard's...games... Well, except for Wrath of the Lich King. I vowed not to ever touch WoW again (not that it was bad, just cause it was sucking waaaay to many hours out of my life).

Wow, a videocard that can actually run Crysis. I never thought I'd see the day... :-D In any case, I'm satisfied with my 8800GT, but it's nice to see what Nvidia is capable of. Just imagine: in about 6-12 months, they'll cut the power consumption/heat emission, halve the price tag, and call it the GTX 285. THAT'll be some impressive tech right there.

I wonder what happens if I upload Homer Simpson's picture into the system...

I'm a fan of the 320mb 8800 GTSs. It's fast and cheap. What more do we need? :-D

Pretty textures. But, like many others have said, it's not worth getting Vista for just this game alone.

Is it just me, or did they release the performance guide BEFORE the review?

It wasn't mentioned because none of the editors are stinking, filthy fanboys.

I'm glad that the GS crew didn't put any blockbuster games in the list. After all, how much coverage is already allocated to hyped-up, big name titles like MGS4, GTA5, and Crysis? It would have been a boring read if they talked about nothing but those games.

Wow...these budget cards perform a lot better than I thought.