@RobDev hahahaha... Classic "You just don't understand", I fully understand that you think having more than one review is pointless, but you don't understand that that's retarded, having different opinions on one thing is always a good thing, because nobody agree 100%, you basically want games to be reviewed by only one person in the whole world, because who needs more than one review right? Tom and Kevin are 2 persons with different opinions, 2 reviews make sense.
The only reason you don't like that there is a new review is that you like the game and Tom gave it a 4, you literally mentioned Metacritic like you're scared that the metacritic score will go down, you're pathetic. And you can't say you don't care when you've been complaining for like an hour... I'm not the one who should be moving on.
So basically, your point is that 2 reviews is stupid, mine is that different point of views is always good, you can't refute that, so I win, good night.
@RobDev It's a new thing with the new site, they're now allowing more than one review for each game. I assume someone is going to be assigned to do the main review... Then if other reviewers on the site played the game and want to review it they can do it. I have no idea why you're so upset about it, more point of views is always good.
@Rooten I got my PC for 1000$ 3 years and I can still play everything on high settings... You seem to think games get more and more demanding each year, Crysis came out 6 years ago and it's still one of the best looking game ever, there will be a jump in quality with the new generation of consoles, but that it's. I'll probably just get a new graphics card and I'll be fine, which will cost me less than a new console btw.
And if you seriously paid more than 2000$ for a new PC, you probably way overpaid for some alienware shit or something.
DepressiveMan's comments