[QUOTE="Jaysonguy"][QUOTE="alphamale1989"]

READ THIS:

For those of you who are mad about the 3 for graphics:

What your saying is that a developer can spend alot of time making good graphics and perhaps earn a 9, or a developer can make an 'old school' game, forget the graphics and also earn a 9.

IGN made the right call on this one - thats a FACT.

Rocky32189

Wrong

It's about going for the look they want.

So with your rule cell shaded games cannot get higher then a 4 or 5.

You're obviously missing the point. Whether the graphical style is intentionally bad or not, it's still bad. Your point makes no sense. Give me one good reason why they should give bad graphics a high score.

There judging the graphics unfairly maybe they should go back in time 10 years back and they'll think it looks amazing. They should be juding it like a retro title there not MM2 has a better rating. Ive said ign cant review games for there life have u ever looked at there vc reviews. There dumb i dont take there opinion in what i think of the game.

IGN once again shows that they have no business reviewing games

They give the graphics a 3 while Capcom was GOING for that look. They didn't try to do HD graphics and fail, they tried for top notch 8 bit design and nailed it.

These people are fools.

Jaysonguy

Yea i agree i hate ign they suck at reviewing games.

none:P