No blood what a great reason to not like a game :./ odds are you just didn't play it enough, I mean did you get the impression in your play time that it was the fastest paced RTS ever made? Because it is, but you have to be good at the game to see it...thats not to say you can't play the game slowly, it's as fast or as slow as you can go. In all honesty Warhammer is pretty shallow in comparison....
The game isn't even that intensive though, this benchmark just runs the game at an absurd resolution most people aren't using! Whats next are they going to only benchmark Crysis at 2500 by 1600?????? Honestly I think Gamespot would have a hard time setting up the benchmarks for this game to make it look as bad as they already have! . . Give me a break 1600 by 1200! Anyone Remeber what the latest computers were doing on Oblivion at that res maxed out when it first came out? Ya it was negative 20 frames! . , Then they turn it down to medium and run the game with a bunch of cheap 120 or less budget cards that is just ridiculous, it's almost as if EA payed them to benchmark the game this way!
Honestly I think Gamespot would have a hard time setting up the benchmarks for this game to make it look as bad as they already have! . . Give me a break 1600 by 1200! Anyone Remeber what the latest computers were doing on Oblivion at that res maxed out when it first came out? Ya it was negative 20 frames! . , Then they turn it down to medium and run the game with a bunch of cheap 120 or less budget cards :( that is just ridiculous, it's almost as if EA payed them to benchmark the game this way!
The game isn't even that intensive though, this benchmark just runs the game at an absurd resolution most people aren't using! Whats next are they going to only benchmark Crysis at 2500 by 1600??????
Dam the Nvidia cards render the game all wrong in comparison to how ATI does it :P I would have liked to have seen some lower rez benchmarks on those higher end cards...
BeyondItAll's comments