Benny_Blakk's forum posts

Avatar image for Benny_Blakk
Benny_Blakk

910

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

55

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#1  Edited By Benny_Blakk
Member since 2007 • 910 Posts

@ronvalencia: @ronvalencia:

@Benny_Blakk said:

@ronvalencia: First off, in typical PC blower fashion, YOU OMIT INPUT DEVICES. Also, the X1 has something called Kinect 2.0 (I think you may have heard of it by now?) of which it's power and capabilities are undeniable. It just remains to be seen how it can effectively be implemented.

Another fail.

Another fail.

According to http://www.techradar.com/au/news/gaming/consoles/why-xbox-one-is-more-expensive-than-ps4-is-revealed-in-teardown-1202939

Xbox One's cost pressures

1. Xbox One's APU is more expensive than PS4's APU i.e. bigger chip due to large ESRAM. R9-270 avoids this cost pressure with external fast GDDR5 memory. As shown via benchmark gaming results, R9-270's 2GB GDDR5 with fast GPU is enough to beat PS4.

2GB GDDR5-5500 > 32 MB ESRAM.

R9-270's 2 GB GDDR5 (179GB/s) also avoids PS4's 8 GB GDDR5 (176 GB/s) cost pressures.

2. Kinect camera sensor, which is estimated to cost the company $75. For $499 budget, I could build a PC box with HD 7850 (~1.76 TFLOPS) for around $400 that would beat X1's GCN+32M ESRAM solution and still have another $80 for Kinect camera sensor.

------------

I would rather see 2GB GDDR5 (in place of 32 MB ESRAM**) + 8 GB DDR3-2133 (as with the current X1).

**Without the 32 MB ESRAM, X1's GPU allocation could have supported 30 CU equiped GCN.

If you add Kinect's $75 cost on to PS4's $399 cost, Sony's solution would be superior to X1.

Sony did a good job with PS4, but I'll exchange 8 GB GDDR5 cost with 2 GB GDDR5 and bigger GPU.

This is exactly how and why you're a butt of so many jokes and basically a laughing stock around these parts.

At what point did SONY or PS4 become a subject of my posts? The answer is none (unless one would consider your digression to be of any merit).

In addition to that, you haven't refuted the fact that you did omit any input devices, which is exactly what I pointed out.

Third, the cost of a PC censor counterpart would drive the cost up even further.

Avatar image for Benny_Blakk
Benny_Blakk

910

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

55

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#2  Edited By Benny_Blakk
Member since 2007 • 910 Posts

@naz99: A lie is when you don't tell the truth, imbecile. More reality and less PC dick sucking for you.

And no, you cannot suck my dick so stop hounding me, fagboy.

Avatar image for Benny_Blakk
Benny_Blakk

910

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

55

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#3 Benny_Blakk
Member since 2007 • 910 Posts

@naz99:

@naz99 said:

@Benny_Blakk said:

@NFJSupreme: You haven't said anything I don't already know, so I can't thank you for it.

You have to take into consideration that the purpose of PC is that it is a customization based unit, which you invest in for the long haul. Going cheap is a bad idea, period. As for cooling, I never said it has to be a major expensive solution that you aim for. But whichever route you choose, it's not free.

The biggest part people overlook, is that these "budget builds" typically use components that run hotter than most. Especially anything using AMD. Not to say by default the system will suffer meltdown, but temperature can be a real issue and not something that is smart to ignore.

In the end, any of these PC blowers adamant pitches are of zero merit because they are preaching vehemently one thing and practicing another. Just one of you guys show me your "$400" build or enjoy a well deserved glass of STFU.

I have helped about 4 of my mates build Pc's and they have all wanted to go cheap as they have not wanted to blow $1000 on something they do not understand...the second build of course is when they wanted to splash out as they felt more comfortable with the hardware ....how is that a hard concept to grasp??

Defensive butthurt mode in full effect. And you just proved my point: I specifically stated you PC blowers are not being honest because you personally don't own nor use these "budget builds" you borderline worship, yet are the staunch advocates. How much did these unita you helped your "mates" with eventually cost? TOTAL? Buy cheap, expect cheap results. That is common sense and far from a revalation.

Furthermore, it is fact that components degrade over time if exceeding recommended temperatures. We cannot assume that the conditions in which the owners keep their unit are identical to those recommended by the manufacturer.

Avatar image for Benny_Blakk
Benny_Blakk

910

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

55

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#4  Edited By Benny_Blakk
Member since 2007 • 910 Posts

@NFJSupreme: You haven't said anything I don't already know, so I can't thank you for it.

You have to take into consideration that the purpose of PC is that it is a customization based unit, which you invest in for the long haul. Going cheap is a bad idea, period. As for cooling, I never said it has to be a major expensive solution that you aim for. But whichever route you choose, it's not free.

The biggest part people overlook, is that these "budget builds" typically use components that run hotter than most. Especially anything using AMD. Not to say by default the system will suffer meltdown, but temperature can be a real issue and not something that is smart to ignore.

In the end, any of these PC blowers adamant pitches are of zero merit because they are preaching vehemently one thing and practicing another. Just one of you guys show me your "$400" build or enjoy a well deserved glass of STFU.

Avatar image for Benny_Blakk
Benny_Blakk

910

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

55

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#5  Edited By Benny_Blakk
Member since 2007 • 910 Posts

@StrongDeadlift said:

I.E. a very average game unremarkable by its own merits, with its magor selling point being the fake industry love it gets due to paid off review scores/gaming press shoving the game down our throats.

Guarantee it will sweep up every GOTY award, and the people hyping the game wont be able to tell you a single thing about it that it does that other games dont do better, outside of the massive list of GOTYs Lems will spam. They'll be pllastered all over the box as well.

Its Uncharted 2 all over again (which, lettuce be real tea here, prior to the second game, was an unremarkable franchise that was once in the same conversation as Resistance and Motorstorm. Cows didn't give a shit about uncharted until Uncharted 2 and the GOTYs came out, and even then, only because Sony needed to trojan horse Nathan Drake into Playstation's new mascot after losing Metal Gear and Final Fantasy exclusivity)

Enjoy it, Lems.

You're just begging for someone to throw a ton of "butthurt" claims at you.

Your own reasoning is flawed because the whole point is that Uncharted 2 is a very good game and huge improvement over the first. Of course it would gain more recognition that its predecessor.

Avatar image for Benny_Blakk
Benny_Blakk

910

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

55

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#6 Benny_Blakk
Member since 2007 • 910 Posts

@IgGy621985: They are a bunch of miserable, pathetic liars. Not only do the PC gamers who frequent this site have rigs that far exceed that price, but they don't even take into consideration cooling the internal environment which by default adds more to the price tag. These prices they keep pushing is a joke and a lie. You don't go with a "cheap premium". That is an oxymoron and impractical.

Avatar image for Benny_Blakk
Benny_Blakk

910

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

55

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#7 Benny_Blakk
Member since 2007 • 910 Posts

@ronvalencia: First off, in typical PC blower fashion, YOU OMIT INPUT DEVICES. Also, the X1 has something called Kinect 2.0 (I think you may have heard of it by now?) of which it's power and capabilities are undeniable. It just remains to be seen how it can effectively be implemented.

Another fail.

Avatar image for Benny_Blakk
Benny_Blakk

910

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

55

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#8 Benny_Blakk
Member since 2007 • 910 Posts

@ronvalencia: No, it can't handle the "all in one" of the XB1. It doesn't even have an optical drive! You're also comparing a product that is already on the market to something that doesn't even have a release date.

Avatar image for Benny_Blakk
Benny_Blakk

910

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

55

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#9 Benny_Blakk
Member since 2007 • 910 Posts

@BattlefieldFan3: To be honest, they are selling units and the "casual device" theme seems to be working. That may be all that matters in the end. Let's not forget games.

Avatar image for Benny_Blakk
Benny_Blakk

910

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

55

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#10 Benny_Blakk
Member since 2007 • 910 Posts

@lostrib: Gamespot buttplugger status cofirmed.

"One" is slang for "peace", stupid.