Awakening124's forum posts

Avatar image for Awakening124
Awakening124

379

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

7

Followers

Reviews: 18

User Lists: 0

#1 Awakening124
Member since 2004 • 379 Posts
"They just need to find people with creative ideas in how to use it." That's what I mean with the second answer in the poll.
Avatar image for Awakening124
Awakening124

379

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

7

Followers

Reviews: 18

User Lists: 0

#2 Awakening124
Member since 2004 • 379 Posts
Personally, I say the second choice is the most realistic, and pretty likely.
Avatar image for Awakening124
Awakening124

379

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

7

Followers

Reviews: 18

User Lists: 0

#3 Awakening124
Member since 2004 • 379 Posts
Hopefully we can all agree that, when it comes to games, we prefer quality over quantity (generally, I'm not saying that having only one awesome game would be alright...you know what I mean).
Avatar image for Awakening124
Awakening124

379

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

7

Followers

Reviews: 18

User Lists: 0

#4 Awakening124
Member since 2004 • 379 Posts
I said 'major' not 'quality.' I'm not a fangirl, I made an observation and obviously all observations are subject to change upon hearing new info.
Avatar image for Awakening124
Awakening124

379

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

7

Followers

Reviews: 18

User Lists: 0

#5 Awakening124
Member since 2004 • 379 Posts
Gamerankings.com has no more weight than any other site where you can rate games. I don't get why people use it as the end-all be-all game rating site.
Avatar image for Awakening124
Awakening124

379

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

7

Followers

Reviews: 18

User Lists: 0

#6 Awakening124
Member since 2004 • 379 Posts

I'd argue that none of the systems have a decent library of games at the moment, but then again I don't like playing sports, racing or (most) shooters.

As far as games that are coming, anything that comes out for both the PS3 and the 360 I'll get on the PS3 simply because it's a better machine. For the GameInformer readers out there: Remember how GI would compare the PS2 version to the XBOX version and if they weren't the same, the XBOX version would be better (shorter load times, tighter graphics, etc)? It's gonna be the same situation, only it'll be the Sony product that runs better instead of the Microsoft one. That's not to say one should buy a PS3 over a 360, someone who loves gaming should really have both, but this generation of gaming is shaping to be just like the last one, except with Microsoft on top and Sony just behind it. Why? The company with the best product goes on the biggest ego trip, thinking that their strong console will somehow sell itself. Microsoft did it with the XBOX, and now Sony is doing it with the PS3.

That got a little off track...but it's still a bit relevant.

Avatar image for Awakening124
Awakening124

379

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

7

Followers

Reviews: 18

User Lists: 0

#7 Awakening124
Member since 2004 • 379 Posts
I tried using the quick turn, but I found it to be disorienting more than anything else. They wouldn't need that feature to begin with if they just made his turning speed faster than glacial. I'm not saying it should be super rapid, but making him turn faster seems easier to me than keeping it at a slow pace and adding another button to push. ::Shrug:: Maybe they just couldn't think of what to use the top shoulder buttons for... I'm not saying that LP is the worst game ever, but it's definitely way more flawed than it should be.
Avatar image for Awakening124
Awakening124

379

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

7

Followers

Reviews: 18

User Lists: 0

#8 Awakening124
Member since 2004 • 379 Posts

In the 360's first year it had three major titles: Gears of War, Oblivion, and Dead Rising (none of which were launch titles and one of them was released right at the end of year one).

Am I missing something, or was the point of releasing the console a year ahead to put out as many quality games so that they'd be way ahead of the PS3 by the time it was released.

If Microsoft had released the 360 around the same time as Sony released the PS3 with Dead Rising, Oblivion, and Gears of war as launch titles, along with the cheaper price, they would have OBLITERATED the competition. Not to mention they would have had an extra to work out the kinks of the system that people have complained about.

The only positive thing I can see about the 360 being released a year earlier is that the public would be familiar with the system by the time the PS3 came out.

Your thoughts?

Avatar image for Awakening124
Awakening124

379

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

7

Followers

Reviews: 18

User Lists: 0

#9 Awakening124
Member since 2004 • 379 Posts

Hows about we wait more than four months before deeming something a flop, eh? Maybe? Or does that not fit into your reasoning of "If I prove that I own the best console, that somehow makes me the coolest person on the planet?"

Avatar image for Awakening124
Awakening124

379

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

7

Followers

Reviews: 18

User Lists: 0

#10 Awakening124
Member since 2004 • 379 Posts
My sig says it all. :D