Areola54's forum posts

Avatar image for Areola54
Areola54

1827

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

1

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#1 Areola54
Member since 2006 • 1827 Posts
it is the power of the cell. it's having a timeshift effect on the games.
Avatar image for Areola54
Areola54

1827

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

1

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#2 Areola54
Member since 2006 • 1827 Posts
[QUOTE="Areola54"][QUOTE="inertk"][QUOTE="Areola54"]

the mear fact that you GT5 people canot prove that it looks better says a lot. if the game looked like the photomode shots whey had, no one will argue. but it doesn't. GT5 is just another average looking racer that cannot even solidly outperform several month old games like Forza 2 and PGR4

face the facts. downgrade confirmed. you people were fooled by bull shots

inertk

It's funny you say that, considering people in this thread are posting bullshots to prove the supposed superiority of PGR4/Forza2 over GT5 using bullshots. ;/

Personally, I don't see a point in doing it because I know that simply posting screenshots isn't enough to prove someone "wrong" or "right". Especially with something as subjective as this.

even the hardcore fanboys would not be able to deny if in game looked like the bull shots. if that was the case this thread would not have been created. lemmings would have kept away.

But PGR4/Forza 2 looked nothing like the bullshots or photomode shots, PGR4 being the biggest culprit out of all 3 games here.

So what's the problem? For some perspective however;

About the closest I could get, first shot was from PD. Other two are Gamersyde captures. Hmm. ;/ I'm sure it's more noticeable during actual gameplay because of things like AA/AF.

well, the hype GT5 fans created doesn't match up in game. Forza 2 doesn't look bad. it runs at rock solid 60fps with full damage and physics.

PGR4 was a rushed game they put out there before Activison bought that studio. it was never meant to come out this year.

compared to that GT5 doesn't meassure up. only thing it is trying to do is look good. physics and damage are not at the same level as Forza 2. no does it have all the other options like painting, etc...

Avatar image for Areola54
Areola54

1827

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

1

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#3 Areola54
Member since 2006 • 1827 Posts

[QUOTE="Always-Honest"]the demo is not very next gen imo... the graphics are, but the rest is... well, not special in any way.. it's... boring even.syfaizahmed

WHAT!!! i loved the demo... i guess u have to like racing sims to like this game

well you guys haven't been playing many good game lately. standards for you are lower than for the people playing on 360.

Avatar image for Areola54
Areola54

1827

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

1

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#4 Areola54
Member since 2006 • 1827 Posts
news on a Wii forum. we should all get news like this.
Avatar image for Areola54
Areola54

1827

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

1

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#5 Areola54
Member since 2006 • 1827 Posts

:lol: PS3 is the joke that never stops.

wonder what happened to all the cell power. maybe it's needed for folding at home number crunching

Avatar image for Areola54
Areola54

1827

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

1

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#6 Areola54
Member since 2006 • 1827 Posts
[QUOTE="Areola54"]

the mear fact that you GT5 people canot prove that it looks better says a lot. if the game looked like the photomode shots whey had, no one will argue. but it doesn't. GT5 is just another average looking racer that cannot even solidly outperform several month old games like Forza 2 and PGR4

face the facts. downgrade confirmed. you people were fooled by bull shots

inertk

It's funny you say that, considering people in this thread are posting bullshots to prove the supposed superiority of PGR4/Forza2 over GT5 using bullshots. ;/

Personally, I don't see a point in doing it because I know that simply posting screenshots isn't enough to prove someone "wrong" or "right". Especially with something as subjective as this.

even the hardcore fanboys would not be able to deny if in game looked like the bull shots. if that was the case this thread would not have been created. lemmings would have kept away.

Avatar image for Areola54
Areola54

1827

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

1

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#7 Areola54
Member since 2006 • 1827 Posts

those are really bad signs. sings of a desperate people doing desperate stuff.

they have no clue how to turn this around so they try introducing multiple skus, removing features, bringing back features, baseless hype that never comes true it just keeps going

Avatar image for Areola54
Areola54

1827

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

1

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#8 Areola54
Member since 2006 • 1827 Posts

the mear fact that you GT5 people canot prove that it looks better says a lot. if the game looked like the photomode shots whey had, no one will argue. but it doesn't. GT5 is just another average looking racer that cannot even solidly outperform several month old games like Forza 2 and PGR4

face the facts. downgrade confirmed. you people were fooled by bull shots

Avatar image for Areola54
Areola54

1827

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

1

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#9 Areola54
Member since 2006 • 1827 Posts

graphics are touch above Forza 2. thats at the expense of damage and physics.

thats sad. I always said all those photmode shots were just bull shots. in game is not even close. infact PGR4 looks better ingame.

Avatar image for Areola54
Areola54

1827

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

1

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#10 Areola54
Member since 2006 • 1827 Posts

nope.....

in game still doesn't look nice. all the HDR gone when it comes to ingame. only look good in photo mode