AnxietyAttack's forum posts

Avatar image for AnxietyAttack
AnxietyAttack

471

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

1

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#1 AnxietyAttack
Member since 2011 • 471 Posts

[QUOTE="DerekLoffin"][QUOTE="KC_Hokie"]Again, graphics are purely subjective. And when a plurality of reviewers specifically state the Xbox 360 version of Crysis 2 is the best looking console game to date it carries weight. You're free to disagree with those reviewers but your opinion doesn't override those of numerous professional reviewers.BloodyFalcon007

And as I said, numerous reviewers also contradicted that, and they are professionals too. It useless to try and use this when you have stalemate like that. You can try all you like, but it is a he said she said situation. Like I said, it is in dispute, presenting it as anything else is disingenuous.

Why don't you name those "numerous" reviews that you have "seen"

Those reviews were posted in this thread, which I like to keep handy for people like you.

Avatar image for AnxietyAttack
AnxietyAttack

471

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

1

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#2 AnxietyAttack
Member since 2011 • 471 Posts

Nothing you say can make paying for LIVE a good thing. The only reason I do it is to play online and I could live without all the other stuff. If they really wanted to, hackers could do the same to LIVE that they did to PSN. PSN was only down for like 3-4 weeks right? That was the first time it happened in the whole time the PS3 has been available.

You know, if live was made free in exchange for major downtime every now and then, I would be fine with that.

cloudff7tm

Nice try but until XBL go's down for a monthlike PSN did, it will always be considered as more secure.

Avatar image for AnxietyAttack
AnxietyAttack

471

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

1

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#4 AnxietyAttack
Member since 2011 • 471 Posts

I say GeoW3, UC doesn't seem to be aging very well IMO. Besides better character models than the previous game and a little too much bloom from what I've seen so far, UC3 looks alot like UC2. At least GeoW3 looks better by leaps and bounds than it's predecessor.

Avatar image for AnxietyAttack
AnxietyAttack

471

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

1

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#6 AnxietyAttack
Member since 2011 • 471 Posts

[QUOTE="Ultra_Combo"]

[QUOTE="04dcarraher"]

Having only 512mb of memory and a slow gpu and cpu does limits its abilities. But also the fact that almost all games havent looked much better since 2007-2008 kinda prooves that the 360 has been at its limit for years.

04dcarraher

Gears 3 and Crysis 2 say hi, and yes they both look ALOT better then what was produced before them

Yet, Crysis 2 look alot like Unreal 3 engine in many cases and doesnot look that great, and Gears 3 still using the same engine as the 1st game. Dont confuse art style with graphics ie texture detail or tweaking. Because whn they when from gears 1 to 2, alot of things had to be downgraded to get certain effects.

You officially have no creditability.

Avatar image for AnxietyAttack
AnxietyAttack

471

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

1

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#7 AnxietyAttack
Member since 2011 • 471 Posts

XBL is better PSN sucks in comparison IMO.

Avatar image for AnxietyAttack
AnxietyAttack

471

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

1

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#8 AnxietyAttack
Member since 2011 • 471 Posts

[QUOTE="Baxhand"]

[QUOTE="_Cadbury_"]I love how no one was paying for XBL for security reasons before the PSN hack, yet suddenly now it's what everyone's been paying for all along._Cadbury_

Considering what happened to sony. It's nice to know it there. Amirite?

I would consider it a win for xbl. wouldn't you?

You have no idea whether the same could happen to XBL ;) Paying doesn't mean you're protected. PSN already had PS+ going when Sony got hacked. Did paying for the service protect those customers? No.

Stop the fud please, everyone with a rational mind knows that Sony had a gaping hole in their security. Nobody here knows how much money from subscription fee's gets funneled back into XBL or PS+ for improvements or what exactly the money gets used for, so why even talk about it?

Avatar image for AnxietyAttack
AnxietyAttack

471

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

1

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#9 AnxietyAttack
Member since 2011 • 471 Posts

[QUOTE="Baxhand"]

[QUOTE="_Cadbury_"]I love how no one was paying for XBL for security reasons before the PSN hack, yet suddenly now it's what everyone's been paying for all along._Cadbury_

Considering what happened to sony. It's nice to know it there. Amirite?

I would consider it a win for xbl. wouldn't you?

You have no idea whether the same could happen to XBL ;) Paying doesn't mean you're protected. PSNalready had PS+ going when Sony got hacked. Did paying for the service protect those customers? No.

How the hell do you know that our subscriptions to XBL aren't contributing to security in some way? Sony makes piddely squat from the PS+ service compared to what MS rakes in from XBL. Fact is, XBL hasn't been hacked like PSN as of yet, so until that actually happens people are going to view XBL as more secure by default that's just the way it is.