Do you think Xbox live gold should be free?

This topic is locked from further discussion.

Avatar image for harjyotbanwait
harjyotbanwait

398

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#1 harjyotbanwait
Member since 2008 • 398 Posts

In my opinion, yes. I had gold for a year but ultimately it was just paying 60 bucks for p2p online. I mean when services like Steam can serve almost the same functionality at no additional cost and with dedicated servers, what good reason can there be for Xbox live gold costing money.

Avatar image for UT_Wrestler
UT_Wrestler

16426

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 27

User Lists: 0

#2 UT_Wrestler
Member since 2004 • 16426 Posts
It's a simple economic principle. Demand is high, so that's why it's there. Enough people are willing to pay for it, therefore it costs money. If people refused to pay for it, then it would be free.
Avatar image for Jaysonguy
Jaysonguy

39454

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 7

User Lists: 0

#3 Jaysonguy
Member since 2006 • 39454 Posts

Not a all

Honestly I wish they'd raise it to 200 or 300 dollars a year and weed out people.

I understand that gaming costs money and the best console experience online is probably going to cost someone to provide

I'm perfectly content with paying for the best console service available

Avatar image for chaoz-king
chaoz-king

5956

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#4 chaoz-king
Member since 2005 • 5956 Posts
Yes, but I'm not going to whine if it's not free.
Avatar image for gatsbythepig
gatsbythepig

11938

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#5 gatsbythepig
Member since 2003 • 11938 Posts
[QUOTE="Jaysonguy"]

Not a all

Honestly I wish they'd raise it to 200 or 300 dollars a year and weed out people.

I understand that gaming costs money and the best console experience online is probably going to cost someone to provide

I'm perfectly content with paying for the best console service available

I agree with payment but I think they should degrade the service first.
Avatar image for archvile_78
archvile_78

8438

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#6 archvile_78
Member since 2007 • 8438 Posts

Heh, its technically 4$ a month so i don't mind paying for it.

Avatar image for Javieralijandro
Javieralijandro

2667

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#7 Javieralijandro
Member since 2009 • 2667 Posts
It's a simple economic principle. Demand is high, so that's why it's there. Enough people are willing to pay for it, therefore it costs money. If people refused to pay for it, then it would be free.UT_Wrestler
this, this is why computer gamers no longer have to pay the xbl gold subscription.
Avatar image for STARXWOLF
STARXWOLF

758

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#8 STARXWOLF
Member since 2009 • 758 Posts

no but silver should be

Avatar image for doughb0y
doughb0y

57

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#9 doughb0y
Member since 2009 • 57 Posts
I think Online Play should be free, it's pretty ridiculous that PC, PS3. Wii are free yet you get charged on the 360. Sure 60$ a year aint much but that's a hole 60$ you could be using to buy a game. Whenever i buy a gold membership every year i feel like i just threw money in the garbage because it realy offers nothing else for me other then online play.... I dont realy care about these exclusive demos or exclusive content i just wanna game.
Avatar image for NeonNinja
NeonNinja

17318

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 115

User Lists: 0

#11 NeonNinja
Member since 2005 • 17318 Posts

I've been an Xbox owner since November 15, 2001 and an Xbox 360 owners since like July 2006. I don't enjoy paying for Gold so I'm almost always Silver. Every now and then I'll pick up a month card or a 3 month card or something to play a game I really want to play online. Otherwise I'm not a fan of paying.

Avatar image for PoisoN_Facecam0
PoisoN_Facecam0

3734

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#12 PoisoN_Facecam0
Member since 2009 • 3734 Posts
yes it should be free.. PSN offers almost everything that XBL does and its completely free... which reminds me.. i gotta cancel my live subscription before it renews again..
Avatar image for vp22
vp22

1443

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#13 vp22
Member since 2008 • 1443 Posts
yes it should be free
Avatar image for krunkfu2
krunkfu2

4218

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#15 krunkfu2
Member since 2007 • 4218 Posts

it should be and after this year runs out i'm done

all you get is the same experience everywhere else

shet is a rip off

Avatar image for def_mode
def_mode

4237

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#16 def_mode
Member since 2005 • 4237 Posts

Online play used to be free then Xbox360 came...

We pay for Live not because its worth it, its so we could play our games online.

Avatar image for def_mode
def_mode

4237

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#17 def_mode
Member since 2005 • 4237 Posts
[QUOTE="Wrecked69"]No, if it was free it would be as terrible as PS3's online. 50 bucks is a joke too

PSN is not terrible.
Avatar image for chaoscougar1
chaoscougar1

37603

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 12

User Lists: 0

#18 chaoscougar1
Member since 2005 • 37603 Posts
god i hate this argument, cause people think sony are actually offering a service for free, NO THEY ARE NOT! Instead the devs are paying for the service instead of the consumer, so when the devs dont feel like paying for it anymore, say goodye to that game online and who can really complain about $50 a year, or less than a dollar a week. If you cant afford that then i wonder how you even have running water. Its a great service for a measly fee, stop whining
Avatar image for LegitN
LegitN

88

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 5

User Lists: 0

#19 LegitN
Member since 2009 • 88 Posts

Not a all

Honestly I wish they'd raise it to 200 or 300 dollars a year and weed out people.

I understand that gaming costs money and the best console experience online is probably going to cost someone to provide

I'm perfectly content with paying for the best console service available

Jaysonguy
are you insane?
Avatar image for LittleEnid
LittleEnid

552

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#20 LittleEnid
Member since 2009 • 552 Posts

The fee really isn't that bad. My brother has a PS3, and I agree that the service XBL provides is better. The online play on the Wii is a joke.

That being said, I think for the $50 we should receive more features (discounted and some free DLC), but all in all, I don't mind it. It's cheaper than WoW was.

Avatar image for jad206
jad206

1821

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#21 jad206
Member since 2009 • 1821 Posts

I do not think it should be free. I mean then we would get less updates then we are now, everygame would be laggy. Also all the ps3 kids would come to xbox(you know their there just becuase it's free). 5 dollers a month for gold. Cant really buy anything for 5 bucks, so sure why not?

Avatar image for AmarTheBosnian
AmarTheBosnian

25

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#22 AmarTheBosnian
Member since 2009 • 25 Posts
I find it pretty ridiculous that I payed $300+ for a console, and each game costs $60 each and if I want some extra features, it's going to cost even more money. Games are already expensive as it is, and seeing how PS3 online works probably just as well as 360 online, the fee is just asking for too much in my opinion.
Avatar image for ta11on
ta11on

784

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#23 ta11on
Member since 2007 • 784 Posts

I think online P2P should be free with Silver service, and then just add in extra features into Gold that you don't get for free.

Avatar image for doughb0y
doughb0y

57

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#24 doughb0y
Member since 2009 • 57 Posts

I think online P2P should be free with Silver service, and then just add in extra features into Gold that you don't get for free.

ta11on
Exactly. P2P Peer to Peer online gaming should be free because it costs nothing to microsoft.
Avatar image for mariokart64fan
mariokart64fan

20828

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 101

User Lists: 1

#25 mariokart64fan
Member since 2003 • 20828 Posts

yea if the dc ps2 ps3 wii psp ds all have free internet multiplayer 360 should to also i find it funny wii and ps3 have web browsers as does psp ds , but the 360 does not its wierd

Avatar image for Nemesis4747
Nemesis4747

1104

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#26 Nemesis4747
Member since 2004 • 1104 Posts

i know it will never be free, but cheaper i could go with, its $100 a year in aust and there are no dedicated servers for match making, coupled with my sub-standard connection i get alot of lag when playing people rom the U.S

Avatar image for BloodSeeker1337
BloodSeeker1337

1278

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#27 BloodSeeker1337
Member since 2009 • 1278 Posts
Yes! Xbox Live should be free. PSN has a free service and it has almost the features of Xbox Live .And PSN has some games that run on dedicated servers. XBL = Free FTW!
Avatar image for deactivated-61cf0c4baf12e
deactivated-61cf0c4baf12e

6013

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 5

User Lists: 0

#28 deactivated-61cf0c4baf12e
Member since 2006 • 6013 Posts

no but silver should be

STARXWOLF

Silver is free, and it gives you nothing!

Anyway, I don't mind paying 50$ a year if the service is as good as it is: little to no lag at all is a great thing in videogames!

Avatar image for DeadApeBladder
DeadApeBladder

692

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#29 DeadApeBladder
Member since 2009 • 692 Posts

C: It's simple. Don't buy it. No one forces you to.

Avatar image for The_Dowell
The_Dowell

353

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#30 The_Dowell
Member since 2009 • 353 Posts

oh look, it's this thread again.

Avatar image for jrhawk42
jrhawk42

12764

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 19

User Lists: 0

#31 jrhawk42
Member since 2003 • 12764 Posts

I don't like paying for gold, but I know XBL would suck w/out the subscription model.

I know this doesn' exactly make sense, but more people actually play on live w/ the subscription model than w/out it. When something is free people tend to not use it as much. W/ the subscription model players are like "if I'm paying $50 a year I'm going to get my money's worth."

Bascially if it was free most people wouldn't play.

Avatar image for souljagirl11
souljagirl11

45

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#32 souljagirl11
Member since 2009 • 45 Posts
i honestly think that all ps3 and xbox fanboys are morons, however having free online would give ps3 users nothing to complain about the xbox
Avatar image for OfficialBed
OfficialBed

17668

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#33 OfficialBed
Member since 2005 • 17668 Posts

No, I don't believe it should be free.

Avatar image for orb_03_2006
orb_03_2006

8494

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 75

User Lists: 0

#34 orb_03_2006
Member since 2006 • 8494 Posts
sure, we all wish it was free. but since the service is so good, I don't mind paying for it.
Avatar image for Totalgym9000
Totalgym9000

1456

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#35 Totalgym9000
Member since 2009 • 1456 Posts
No, if it was free it would be as terrible as PS3's online. 50 bucks is a joke tooWrecked69
PSN is not terrible at all, some games even have deticated servers, now Wii's online is terrible but ps3s online is just as good as xbox live if your just playing a match the only thing is doesnt have really is cross game chat which is a nice feature on xbox live, But when it comes to playing games PSN=xboxlive
Avatar image for Totalgym9000
Totalgym9000

1456

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#36 Totalgym9000
Member since 2009 • 1456 Posts
i honestly think that all ps3 and xbox fanboys are morons, however having free online would give ps3 users nothing to complain about the xboxsouljagirl11
Actually for me it would mean id actually Think about purchasing multiplats on 360 over my ps3, But for now if a buy a xbox 360 game that has multiplayer I only get half a game because I dont have gold, So I just end up getting it on the ps3 and get the Whole game A silver only account on the 360 = half a game, which is totally unfair.
Avatar image for Urban_Flow
Urban_Flow

721

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#37 Urban_Flow
Member since 2009 • 721 Posts

The fee really isn't that bad. My brother has a PS3, and I agree that the service XBL provides is better. The online play on the Wii is a joke.

That being said, I think for the $50 we should receive more features (discounted and some free DLC), but all in all, I don't mind it. It's cheaper than WoW was.

LittleEnid

Agreed.

Avatar image for Wrecked69
Wrecked69

869

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 84

User Lists: 0

#39 Wrecked69
Member since 2008 • 869 Posts
[QUOTE="Wrecked69"]No, if it was free it would be as terrible as PS3's online. 50 bucks is a joke tooTotalgym9000
PSN is not terrible at all, some games even have deticated servers, now Wii's online is terrible but ps3s online is just as good as xbox live if your just playing a match the only thing is doesnt have really is cross game chat which is a nice feature on xbox live, But when it comes to playing games PSN=xboxlive

You still admit XBL is better. How can 50$ a YEAR be an issue? Pretty sure a homeless dude could afford an XBL gold subscription by getting change on the street everyday.
Avatar image for Hickamie14
Hickamie14

1652

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 11

User Lists: 0

#40 Hickamie14
Member since 2007 • 1652 Posts

No, or else I wouldn't currently have Xbox LIVE.

Avatar image for DarthKalo
DarthKalo

902

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#41 DarthKalo
Member since 2006 • 902 Posts

I think the new Camaro's shouldbe free, because I want them to be! WTF

Avatar image for TOC48
TOC48

637

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 5

User Lists: 0

#42 TOC48
Member since 2008 • 637 Posts
I think that it should be free but 50 for a year is not much at all. It will never be free also seeing as how much money it makes microsoft.
Avatar image for rattleheadxyz
rattleheadxyz

677

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#43 rattleheadxyz
Member since 2008 • 677 Posts

These threads are getting really old...

Live Gold isn't free.

It never will be free.

If you want free online play get a PS3 or a PC.

Quit complaining, really, if you can't afford $4 a month then you need a new hobby. Maybe catching butterflies or something...

Avatar image for Coldzboy
Coldzboy

1959

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#44 Coldzboy
Member since 2004 • 1959 Posts

4 dollars a month for good serviceand noi whiney ps3 free online kids isworth it, end thread.

Avatar image for craigalan23
craigalan23

15879

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#45 craigalan23
Member since 2006 • 15879 Posts

Doesn't matter to me as I only buy it during sales. If you would do the same I doubt you would complain as much. I'll gladly pay $30 for a 12 month subscription again.

Avatar image for joke_man
joke_man

1177

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#46 joke_man
Member since 2005 • 1177 Posts

It's a simple economic principle. Demand is high, so that's why it's there. Enough people are willing to pay for it, therefore it costs money. If people refused to pay for it, then it would be free.UT_Wrestler

Wow, your correlative theory is completely out of whack.........

Avatar image for RockYourPhone
RockYourPhone

25

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#47 RockYourPhone
Member since 2009 • 25 Posts
Yes of course Microsoft makes enough money anyways.
Avatar image for lil_d_mack_314
lil_d_mack_314

13969

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#48 lil_d_mack_314
Member since 2006 • 13969 Posts
[QUOTE="chaoscougar1"]god i hate this argument, cause people think sony are actually offering a service for free, NO THEY ARE NOT! Instead the devs are paying for the service instead of the consumer, so when the devs dont feel like paying for it anymore, say goodye to that game online and who can really complain about $50 a year, or less than a dollar a week. If you cant afford that then i wonder how you even have running water. Its a great service for a measly fee, stop whining

hum, i didnt know that. in any case do i wish it were free? yeh sure, multiplayer any way. but i do i mind paying? no, its like 7$ a Mo. seriously?