I am thinking about buying CoD World at War. I played the Beta and it seemed great, but some people say that Treyarch made another horrible game. Can someone tell me what are the bad game features that made people say that it is not a good game?
This topic is locked from further discussion.
I am thinking about buying CoD World at War. I played the Beta and it seemed great, but some people say that Treyarch made another horrible game. Can someone tell me what are the bad game features that made people say that it is not a good game?
It's not bad. Because its just a reskined version of CoD4. It's just not fresh. I have played CoD4 for so long it got old, same with WW2 put that together and you have one really bland game. I'll just wait for six. By then I am sure I'll want another cod.chaoz-kingSo for someone that hasn't played Cod4 would Cod5 be really good?
[QUOTE="AnotherMulligan"]i've got to be honest, i played cod4 to my 6th prestige, and i like World at War better multiplayer wise. single player really depends on preference, but as for multiplayer, it's more balanced with weapons and classes. there no longer are super weapons like the M16 or AK that can kill everything in an instant, the perks are more balanced so if you get read of stopping power for slight of hand, your power reduction is noticible. if you didn't like cod4, don't bother getting it, but honestly i think it's superior.VuurkThis is nice to hear as I'm planning on getting CoD 5 for xmas and am looking forward to it! it takes a bit of time to get used to the new stuff, but man, is it fun. don't give up on it too quickly!
It's not bad. Because its just a reskined version of CoD4. It's just not fresh. I have played CoD4 for so long it got old, same with WW2 put that together and you have one really bland game. I'll just wait for six. By then I am sure I'll want another cod.chaoz-kingit is not a reskined version it has co op and that alone makes it worth the price there are many small things they did but the coop is what really pushes it out front buy the game you will not regret it
[QUOTE="Vuurk"][QUOTE="AnotherMulligan"]i've got to be honest, i played cod4 to my 6th prestige, and i like World at War better multiplayer wise. single player really depends on preference, but as for multiplayer, it's more balanced with weapons and classes. there no longer are super weapons like the M16 or AK that can kill everything in an instant, the perks are more balanced so if you get read of stopping power for slight of hand, your power reduction is noticible. if you didn't like cod4, don't bother getting it, but honestly i think it's superior.AnotherMulliganThis is nice to hear as I'm planning on getting CoD 5 for xmas and am looking forward to it! it takes a bit of time to get used to the new stuff, but man, is it fun. don't give up on it too quickly! i totally agreed now imagine if these mechanics only in a non WWII setting that would be the perfect game for me
I am thinking about buying CoD World at War. I played the Beta and it seemed great, but some people say that Treyarch made another horrible game. Can someone tell me what are the bad game features that made people say that it is not a good game?
hobo154ever
they said that because it's their opinion....some people like it, others don't
I don't think it's worth buying because the buildings don't blow up and stuff, otherwise it's descent, but not worth the 70 bucks after tax, I mean that's like time and a half, So In Conclusion, It would be worth 30 bucksJimi_13this is call of duty not mercenaries
Please Log In to post.
Log in to comment