Battlefield 3 or modern warfare 3?

Which one do you prefer?

This is a joke right. again with this mw3 is going to be such a flop. same multiplayer for years to come. same 1 hour storyline i mean come on you and your horrible ideas make me vomit

Battlefield, no contest.

Chances are I won't purchase either. But if I were to buy one, it would be Battlefield 3. I can't stand Call of Duty (other than COD4).Alex3796

Battlefield 3. I'm pretty sure most people here will choose BF3.

I have to question how all of you are so 100% sure that BF3 is going to be this flawless, once a generation game. Sure from what we've seen it looks amazing buthow much actual gameplay have you seen? About 10-15 minutes or so right? How much of that was multiplayer? ZERO! That's right..NOTTA!!! So how is it that because of some trailers you guys are so sure that BF3 will be so head and shoulders above MW3? I think that in all honesty it all boils down to gameplay preference. These games are both modern military shooters. But they take entirely different approaches to how they play.

I have to question how all of you are so 100% sure that BF3 is going to be this flawless, once a generation game. Sure from what we've seen it looks amazing buthow much actual gameplay have you seen? About 10-15 minutes or so right? How much of that was multiplayer? ZERO! That's right..NOTTA!!! So how is it that because of some trailers you guys are so sure that BF3 will be so head and shoulders above MW3? I think that in all honesty it all boils down to gameplay preference. These games are both modern military shooters. But they take entirely different approaches to how they play.

kungfuchaos

[QUOTE="kungfuchaos"]

I have to question how all of you are so 100% sure that BF3 is going to be this flawless, once a generation game. Sure from what we've seen it looks amazing buthow much actual gameplay have you seen? About 10-15 minutes or so right? How much of that was multiplayer? ZERO! That's right..NOTTA!!! So how is it that because of some trailers you guys are so sure that BF3 will be so head and shoulders above MW3? I think that in all honesty it all boils down to gameplay preference. These games are both modern military shooters. But they take entirely different approaches to how they play.

HilbillyRokstar

[QUOTE="HilbillyRokstar"]

[QUOTE="kungfuchaos"]

I have to question how all of you are so 100% sure that BF3 is going to be this flawless, once a generation game. Sure from what we've seen it looks amazing buthow much actual gameplay have you seen? About 10-15 minutes or so right? How much of that was multiplayer? ZERO! That's right..NOTTA!!! So how is it that because of some trailers you guys are so sure that BF3 will be so head and shoulders above MW3? I think that in all honesty it all boils down to gameplay preference. These games are both modern military shooters. But they take entirely different approaches to how they play.

javafriek

Screw both. I'm getting Gears 3.vashkey

If i could give you all high end computers for the PCbf3 experience i woulddarkfox101

I'm getting BF3 for x-mas and get MW3 for my b-day or whenever. 8)

BF3 without a doubt.

Battlefield 3, Now can we have no more of these threads EVERY DAY!sharkbiscuit79

Thank you man.

No doubt about it...Battlefield 3. I'm no longer purchasing COD games...every year feels like a rehash of the previous years' title....just different time and setting.

Since I like both BF and COD, the answer is simple: BF3 first. Why? Because its multiplayer is bound to die out faster than COD, if the past years are any indication. Then I can get COD cheaper and there'll still be lots of people on, guaranteed. It'll also stay at high trade-in value for longer at Gamestop, hell I got 25 for COD4 a month ago.TentacleMayor

Battlefield 3 has significantly better graphics, but I've always been more of a Call of Duty kind of guy. I honestly think I'll have more fun with Modern Warfare 3, but Battlefield 3 is definitely going to be much prettier.

I'll be buying both games though i'll be buying Modern Warfare 3 mainly just to play the single player campaign and cant see myself playing the multiplayer too much unless they make some big changes just to refresh the MP as its become very boring now

[QUOTE="kungfuchaos"]

I have to question how all of you are so 100% sure that BF3 is going to be this flawless, once a generation game. Sure from what we've seen it looks amazing buthow much actual gameplay have you seen? About 10-15 minutes or so right? How much of that was multiplayer? ZERO! That's right..NOTTA!!! So how is it that because of some trailers you guys are so sure that BF3 will be so head and shoulders above MW3? I think that in all honesty it all boils down to gameplay preference. These games are both modern military shooters. But they take entirely different approaches to how they play.

HilbillyRokstar

EA= new FROST engine

Infinity Ward= One of my favorite devopers and how they drove one of the biggest game franchises in history. Call of Duty UO still a timeless favorite.

But with the loss of two of the big names in that division. This MW is going to lack a bit of the muscle that IW seems to add each installment.

I think BF will be a better game than MW. But MW is still going to outsell BF as it is the household name.

OO

/2 Cents

I have to question how all of you are so 100% sure that BF3 is going to be this flawless, once a generation game. Sure from what we've seen it looks amazing buthow much actual gameplay have you seen? About 10-15 minutes or so right? How much of that was multiplayer? ZERO! That's right..NOTTA!!! So how is it that because of some trailers you guys are so sure that BF3 will be so head and shoulders above MW3? I think that in all honesty it all boils down to gameplay preference. These games are both modern military shooters. But they take entirely different approaches to how they play.

kungfuchaos

I'm not going to say that BF3 is going to be flawless but I'll tell you why I'm all for BF3 instead of another COD.

Essentially because the Call of Duty formula has NOTchanged since the original Modern Warfare...basically the same 5 to 6 hour campaign with essentially the same multiplayer experience.

Whereas with Battlefield, every BF title this console generation has been significantly better than the other. The difference? One developer tries to improve and innovate whereas the COD devs (Infinity Ward or Treyarch) essentially deliver the same experience over and over again....

Additionally, for those who bought BF Bad Company 2 NEW at the stores, they were able to get free downloadable maps without dishing a penny. The only payable DLC maps was the Vietnam release and that was a different experience altogether. Does anyone remember how much the new COD maps cost?

Case closed....

Infinity Ward= One of my favorite devopers and how they drove one of the biggest game franchises in history. Call of Duty UO still a timeless favorite.hotplayer220

You do know that UO wasn't made by IW, right? It was made by Grey Matter who essentially merged with Treyarch in 2005.

I hope those poll results reflect actual game sales oterwise im going search and destory the cod servers