By the way, they spent all of this time building Umaga, so, why, he could put over the likes of John Cena? Why? John Cena, whether or not is good thing will remain to be seen, already has all of the status and credibility he needs...and their plenty, well, you know what I mean, other wrestlers that could have taken Umaga's place. I mean...if that is not waste of time, I am not sure what is...
Granted, Umaga is somebody I could due without, and obviously, person most certainly did not, and do not, what to see with the title around his waist. However, with that said, if Vince McMahon is right, and we the IWC our wrong, why is that defines his own logic? From my perspective, these our very questions, if nothing else, our signs of why that kind of logic has some errors in regards to its thought process...
Link256
heh, you love putting granted in most of your rants..:P
But back to the subject, logic doesn't come to mind whenever creative are involved. I think I remember you or the Dude saying a while back, that John Cena was in a Tag Team match with Carlito on RAW..that it defied all logic because why would 'one guy who got the other guy stabbed a few years back, suddenly become allies in a Tag Team match?'
Well the fact of the matter is, is that Mc Mahon doesn't care mostly about the logic, just what he can draw mostly from the situation of where the storylines are going. If he has a good guy and a bad guy in a PPV title match, then WWE automaticaly have this idea that having the good guy look like he is going to win will draw more..
Someone may counter that by saying that well, if McMahon and creative want to draw more, then wouldn't agreeing with the IWC draw more? I think creative feel that the IWC is only a small cut of the demographic of America, the World who watch WWE and don't want to lose out on the other saps, and cetards and WWE marks..(even though you and I and loads of other people know that they won't anyway)
Log in to comment