What was the best or your favorite wrestling promotion?

I am going with both the WWF and WWE.

They both have their pros' and cons' but for me they've both been compelling and earn my approval of being the best wrestling promotion of all time.

As much as I'd like to say TNA, well it is a fairly new fed and it hasn't evolved just yet to be as popular as the WWF/E. Who knows though? In 10 years time my opinion could change.

The WWF Attitude Era was great time to be a wrestling fan, some of the best feuds and matches ever took place during that time

I am going with both the WWF and WWE.

They both have their pros' and cons' but for me they've both been compelling and earn my approval of being the best wrestling promotion of all time.

As much as I'd like to say TNA, well it is a fairly new fed and it hasn't evolved just yet to be as popular as the WWF/E. Who knows though? In 10 years time my opinion could change.

hbk91

Yeah, that sums up my choice and feelings as well.

I'm gonna go with TNA. keiblerfan69

As of right now, Ring of Honor rocks everyone else's socks off (wow, that was overly cheesy).

All-Time Rankings:

1.  WWF
2.  ROH
3.  ECW
4.  WCW
5.  TNA
6.  WWE

I am going with both the WWF and WWE.

They both have their pros' and cons' but for me they've both been compelling and earn my approval of being the best wrestling promotion of all time.

As much as I'd like to say TNA, well it is a fairly new fed and it hasn't evolved just yet to be as popular as the WWF/E. Who knows though? In 10 years time my opinion could change.

hbk91

My List:

• TNA
• WWF
• ROH
• ECW
• WWE
• WCW

I do not understand why everyone trys to seperate WWF from the WWE?

• Vince McMahon Still owns
• A good number of the same superstars are still there, such as Triple H, Kane, Chris Benoit, Kurt Angle, Undertaker, Big Show Booker T, and etc.
• Same history
• Same championship belts
• Same PPVs
• Same Brands
• and etc.

I am sorry, but I simply do not understand how you could seperate the two, seeing how the WWF is the WWE. :? :|

I do not understand why everyone trys to seperate WWF from the WWE?

• Vince McMahon Still owns
• A good number of the same superstars are still there, such as Triple H, Kane, Chris Benoit, Kurt Angle, Undertaker, Big Show Booker T, and etc.
• Same history
• Same championship belts
• Same PPVs
• Same Brands
• and etc.

I am sorry, but I simply do not understand how you could seperate the two, seeing how the WWF is the WWE. :? :|

Link256

I am sorry, but I simply do not understand how you could seperate the two, seeing how the WWF is the WWE. :? :|Link256

In the end, its all a matter perception.  It may be the same company, run by the same people, delivering the same product.  However, that is not the way I perceive.  When Vince and Co. "got the "F" out" and became World Wrestling Entertainment they became a new entity, in my mind, a divider was placed between the WWE and the WWF.  When I talk about the WWF, I don't mean the shows that appear on Monday and Friday, I mean the wrestling promotion that I loved from the 1980s-2002.  When I refer to WWE, I don't mean the company that I watched as a kid.  It may be the same company, but I don't associate them as the same company.

All right, its time for me to stop, as I'm getting dangerously close to a philosophical rant.  Bottom line:  I think I can speak for everyone, we seperate the WWF from WWE because we can.  We associate those names with entirely different products, which is why we seperate them.

I seperate them because the WWE has allowed me to seperate them.  They may be the same company, but the type of product I associate with the World Wrestling Federation is vastly different than the type of product I associate with World Wrestling Entertainmet.

In the end, its all a matter perception.  It may be the same company, run by the same people, delivering the same product.  However, that is not the way I perceive.  When Vince and Co. "got the "F" out" and became World Wrestling Entertainment they became a new entity, in my mind, a divider was placed between the WWE and the WWF.  When I talk about the WWF, I don't mean the shows that appear on Monday and Friday, I mean the wrestling promotion that I loved from the 1980s-2002.  When I refer to WWE, I don't mean the company that I watched as a kid.  It may be the same company, but I don't associate them as the same company.

All right, its time for me to stop, as I'm getting dangerously close to a philosophical rant.  Bottom line:  I think I can speak for everyone, we seperate the WWF from WWE because we can.  We associate those names with entirely different products, which is why we seperate them.

The_Dude14

IMHO, the reason everyone tries to seperate WWF from the WWE simply because the quality of the product is lower. If the quality of the product were same or better, I think more wrestling fans would associate WWF and WWE as being the same company. If most everybody on here wants to think of WWF and WWE as being two different companies, well... more power to you. 8)