@davillain-: he deleted it
This topic is locked from further discussion.
Why -God- is the worst
1. He doesn't even own a pc
I need to frame this , it speaks the truth so much , it hurts.
If its so true why can't anyone prove it?
Also PC is #1 factually.
Oh , so other people need to proove it?
Ok , i'll check......................................................nope , you don't have a PC.
Oh , so other people need to proove it?
Yeah.
When you are the one starting off the topic and making the original claim you have to prove it.
The burden of proof is often associated with the Latin maximsemper necessitas probandi incumbit ei qui agit, the best translation of which in this context is: "the necessity of proof always lies with the person who lays charges."[1]
Learn to human logic.
Why -God- is the worst
1. He doesn't even own a pc
I need to frame this , it speaks the truth so much , it hurts.
If its so true why can't anyone prove it?
Also PC is #1 factually.
Oh , so other people need to proove it?
Ok , i'll check......................................................nope , you don't have a PC.
Why -God- is the worst
1. He doesn't even own a pc
I need to frame this , it speaks the truth so much , it hurts.
If its so true why can't anyone prove it?
Also PC is #1 factually.
Oh , so other people need to proove it?
Ok , i'll check......................................................nope , you don't have a PC.
The burden of proof is often associated with the Latin maximsemper necessitas probandi incumbit ei qui agit, the best translation of which in this context is: "the necessity of proof always lies with the person who lays charges."[1]
Oh , so other people need to proove it?
Yeah.
When you make the original claim you have to prove it.
The burden of proof is often associated with the Latin maximsemper necessitas probandi incumbit ei qui agit, the best translation of which in this context is: "the necessity of proof always lies with the person who lays charges."[1]
Learn to human logic.
Well , since you don't present couter evidence , we are left with the fact that you don't own one.
You don't even have proof that you're a real person , for all we know , you're a virus - poluting GS.
Well , since you don't present couter evidence ,
The burden of proof is often associated with the Latin maximsemper necessitas probandi incumbit ei qui agit, the best translation of which in this context is: "the necessity of proof always lies with the person who lays charges."[1]
Well , since you don't present couter evidence ,
The burden of proof is often associated with the Latin maximsemper necessitas probandi incumbit ei qui agit, the best translation of which in this context is: "the necessity of proof always lies with the person who lays charges."[1]
My proof is:You can't proove you have a PC , because you don"t have a PC.
I'm waiting for your counter arguement.
Well , since you don't present couter evidence ,
The burden of proof is often associated with the Latin maximsemper necessitas probandi incumbit ei qui agit, the best translation of which in this context is: "the necessity of proof always lies with the person who lays charges."[1]
My proof is:You can't proove you have a PC ,
You're acting like a dumb creationist.
MY proof god exists: You can't prove he doesn't!
That isn't how logic works. Burden of proof bro. Prove I don't have a PC or forever rest your piece. REKT.
Why -God- is the worst
1. He doesn't even own a pc
I need to frame this , it speaks the truth so much , it hurts.
If its so true why can't anyone prove it?
Also PC is #1 factually.
Oh , so other people need to proove it?
Ok , i'll check......................................................nope , you don't have a PC.
How is that kickstarter going to buy -God- a pc? Maybe we should try an indiegogo campaign as well,.
Well , since you don't present couter evidence ,
The burden of proof is often associated with the Latin maximsemper necessitas probandi incumbit ei qui agit, the best translation of which in this context is: "the necessity of proof always lies with the person who lays charges."[1]
My proof is:You can't proove you have a PC ,
You're acting like a dumb creationist.
MY proof god exists: You can't prove he doesn't!
That isn't how logic works. Burden of proof bro. Prove I don't have a PC or forever rest your piece. REKT.
Yeah , i got so rekt you had to edit my post to hide your buthurt.
Don't care for you diversion , but you still don't have a PC.
@-God-: That applies both ways. If you say you have a gaming PC then you are making an assertion of fact and can be asked for proof.
Ant is a truley an scumbag. No proof stop making the claim.
Now I can show proof PS4 is worse than PC.
Holy shit , i broke God.
That's no God, it's just Jankar.
Ant is a truley an scumbag. No proof stop making the claim.
Now I can show proof PS4 is worse than PC.
Here's some tissue dude.....I think you need it.
Okay mods, there's no discussion here since OP deleted his post and I see no reason why this thread needs to be open.
Watching melt downs is always entertaining......
Ant is a truley an scumbag. No proof stop making the claim.
Now I can show proof PS4 is worse than PC.
Holy shit , i broke God.
Ant is a truley an scumbag. No proof stop making the claim.
Now I can show proof PS4 is worse than PC.
Holy shit , i broke God.
That's no God, it's just Jankar.
There is no God, only Zuul
So we retaliate to dumbass fanboys who bash the Xbox needlessly because they are envious of features they lack with their preferred console... or are too stupid to pick one up to see for themselves they are full of shit...
...by making a thread and doing the exact same thing with the PlayStation brand??
"Sony fanboys are the absolute worst." Yeah, but unbeknownst to you, it has nothing to do with the brand they follow, and everything with the fact that all fanboys act the same way.
But I do admit, there is obviously way more PS fanboys here in SW and it is quite annoying. But that is simply because of the numbers. Most "gamers" are fanboys these days. And most people have a PS4 than any other console. Add the two together and you have an tiresome and unbalanced ecosystem. Xbox fanboys have all but vacated the internet forums. All is left are true gamers to suffer through their shit.
Trend threads are not allowed. ..
I laughed at the first 2 sentences and stopped reading. EVERY faction does this, its SYSTEM WARS for a reason.
So no, no fanboys are worse than any others.
But peasantry just have it worse, end of.
It's funny how you knowledge all fanboys are equally bad, when you contribute to the rabble just the same with you PC fanboyism in every post. Or... do you think the urban definition of the "PC elitist" somehow sets you apart form the rest of the "peasant" fanboys?
Congratulations, you identified a double standard that I made no effort to mask. have a gold star... you are one of the smart ones.
Okay mods, there's no discussion here since OP deleted his post and I see no reason why this thread needs to be open.
Watching melt downs is always entertaining......
That's also true. It does helps burn the time lol.
Lol, lemmings are more relaxed only this gen because ps4's kicking xone's butt... But boy you should've seen how obnoxious and annoying lemmings was early last gen,
I need to frame this , it speaks the truth so much , it hurts.
If its so true why can't anyone prove it?
Also PC is #1 factually.
Oh , so other people need to proove it?
Ok , i'll check......................................................nope , you don't have a PC.
The burden of proof is often associated with the Latin maximsemper necessitas probandi incumbit ei qui agit, the best translation of which in this context is: "the necessity of proof always lies with the person who lays charges."[1]
@lostrib can verify this too.
If its so true why can't anyone prove it?
Also PC is #1 factually.
Oh , so other people need to proove it?
Ok , i'll check......................................................nope , you don't have a PC.
The burden of proof is often associated with the Latin maximsemper necessitas probandi incumbit ei qui agit, the best translation of which in this context is: "the necessity of proof always lies with the person who lays charges."[1]
@lostrib can verify this too.
Better make new alt account Jankar.
@-God-: That applies both ways. If you say you have a gaming PC then you are making an assertion of fact and can be asked for proof.
Actually I'm not entirely sure I have ever seen him claim that he does have a gaming PC, I've only ever seen him ask people to prove that he doesn't
Oh , so other people need to proove it?
Ok , i'll check......................................................nope , you don't have a PC.
The burden of proof is often associated with the Latin maximsemper necessitas probandi incumbit ei qui agit, the best translation of which in this context is: "the necessity of proof always lies with the person who lays charges."[1]
@lostrib can verify this too.
Better make new alt account Jankar.
I don't recall saying that. It seems edited.
Please Log In to post.
Log in to comment