Ubisoft screws up with ridiculous Watch Dogs PC reqs

  • 175 results
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4

This topic is locked from further discussion.

Avatar image for IgGy621985
IgGy621985

5922

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#1  Edited By IgGy621985
Member since 2004 • 5922 Posts

Well, Ubisoft does it again. Look at the bold stuff:

Minimum:

OS: Windows Vista (SP2), Windows 7 (SP1) or Windows 8 (Please note that we only support 64 bit OSs.)

Processor: Intel Core 2 Quad Q8400 @ 2.66Ghz or AMD Phenom II X4 940 @ 3.0Ghz

Memory: 6 GB RAM

Graphics: DirectX 11 graphics card with 1 GB Video RAM - Nvidia Geforce GTX 460 or AMD Radeon HD 5770

DirectX: Version 11

Hard Drive: 25 GB available space

Sound Card: DirectX 9.0c Compatible Sound Card with Latest Drivers

Recommended:

OS: Windows Vista (SP2), Windows 7 (SP1) or Windows 8 (Please note that we only support 64 bit OSs.)

Processor: Eight core - Intel Core i7-3770 @3.5 GHz or AMD FX-8350 X8 @ 4 GHz

Memory: 8 GB RAM

Graphics: DirectX 11 graphics card with 2 GB Video RAM - Nvidia Geforce GTX 560 ti or AMD Radeon HD 7850

DirectX: Version 11

Hard Drive: 25 GB available space

Sound Card: DirectX 9.0c Compatible Sound Card with Latest Drivers

I'm okay with RAM requirements, but god damn, what the **** is up with this CPU requirement?!

What do you think?

Avatar image for clyde46
clyde46

49061

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#2  Edited By clyde46
Member since 2005 • 49061 Posts

An i7? Not surprising given that this is an open world game with (I hope) lots of AI calculations.

Avatar image for IgGy621985
IgGy621985

5922

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#3 IgGy621985
Member since 2004 • 5922 Posts
@clyde46 said:

An i7? Not surprising given that this is an open world game with (I hope) lots of AI calculations.

I disagree. It's a complete overkill. i5 could most definitely be up for the job.

Avatar image for with_teeth26
with_teeth26

11511

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 43

User Lists: 1

#4 with_teeth26
Member since 2007 • 11511 Posts

GPU requirement are modest enough but yea those are some steep CPU requirements. I'm not too worried though, I'm sure my OC'd 2500k can handle it.

Avatar image for jun_aka_pekto
jun_aka_pekto

25255

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#5 jun_aka_pekto
Member since 2010 • 25255 Posts

That's fine with me. He He. I'll also have a newer video card by the time I buy that game.

Avatar image for clyde46
clyde46

49061

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#6 clyde46
Member since 2005 • 49061 Posts

@IgGy621985 said:
@clyde46 said:

An i7? Not surprising given that this is an open world game with (I hope) lots of AI calculations.

I disagree. It's a complete overkill. i5 could most definitely be up for the job.

Also, these are "recommended" specs. How often are the recommended specs true to form?

Avatar image for IMAHAPYHIPPO
IMAHAPYHIPPO

4194

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 10

User Lists: 0

#7 IMAHAPYHIPPO
Member since 2004 • 4194 Posts

@IgGy621985 said:
@clyde46 said:

An i7? Not surprising given that this is an open world game with (I hope) lots of AI calculations.

I disagree. It's a complete overkill. i5 could most definitely be up for the job.

I wasn't aware you were programming Watch Dogs.

Avatar image for IgGy621985
IgGy621985

5922

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#8 IgGy621985
Member since 2004 • 5922 Posts

@IMAHAPYHIPPO said:

@IgGy621985 said:
@clyde46 said:

An i7? Not surprising given that this is an open world game with (I hope) lots of AI calculations.

I disagree. It's a complete overkill. i5 could most definitely be up for the job.

I wasn't aware you were programming Watch Dogs.

It's simple. i7 is an overkill.

Avatar image for silversix_
silversix_

26347

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#9 silversix_
Member since 2010 • 26347 Posts

"I'm okay with RAM requirements, but god damn, what the **** is up with this CPU requirement?!" exactly what i thought. You want to know the answer? The first word in your title is the answer. Ubimotherf*ckingsoft, the worst of the worst.

Avatar image for clyde46
clyde46

49061

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#10 clyde46
Member since 2005 • 49061 Posts

@IgGy621985 said:

@IMAHAPYHIPPO said:

@IgGy621985 said:
@clyde46 said:

An i7? Not surprising given that this is an open world game with (I hope) lots of AI calculations.

I disagree. It's a complete overkill. i5 could most definitely be up for the job.

I wasn't aware you were programming Watch Dogs.

It's simple. i7 is an overkill.

What makes you say that? More threads = better.

Avatar image for IMAHAPYHIPPO
IMAHAPYHIPPO

4194

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 10

User Lists: 0

#11 IMAHAPYHIPPO
Member since 2004 • 4194 Posts

@IgGy621985: Not if the game does something impressive with it. People's constant bitching about how much worse the ps4 version looks than the PC demonstration at e3 seems to suggest it will.

Avatar image for battlespectre
BattleSpectre

7989

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#12  Edited By BattleSpectre
Member since 2009 • 7989 Posts

Lol, that's why I went with 16GB ram and people thought it was overkill, yeah look at me now. Anyways for those system requirements I'd hope it looks like the E3 2012 footage when played on PC.

Regardless of that though, I'm still buying this on the PS4 as I don't have another choice. A decent GPU upgrade would cost me $300-$400 Australian, and even than my CPU doesn't fall under the recommended requirements.

I could get it on my Xbox One, but I'm pretty sure Ubisoft confirmed the systems of choice for the game are PC and PS4.

Avatar image for IgGy621985
IgGy621985

5922

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#13  Edited By IgGy621985
Member since 2004 • 5922 Posts

@clyde46 said:

@IgGy621985 said:

@IMAHAPYHIPPO said:

@IgGy621985 said:
@clyde46 said:

An i7? Not surprising given that this is an open world game with (I hope) lots of AI calculations.

I disagree. It's a complete overkill. i5 could most definitely be up for the job.

I wasn't aware you were programming Watch Dogs.

It's simple. i7 is an overkill.

What makes you say that? More threads = better.

When a game asks for an i7 it tells a story about a terrible porting job. i5 Haswell quad core lineup is most definitely capable of running any "next-gen" title.

Avatar image for FoxbatAlpha
FoxbatAlpha

10669

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#14 FoxbatAlpha
Member since 2009 • 10669 Posts

Every new big game pushes the requirements a little further. If the game is good I can justify an upgrade. I just meet recommended.

Avatar image for IgGy621985
IgGy621985

5922

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#15 IgGy621985
Member since 2004 • 5922 Posts

@IMAHAPYHIPPO said:

@IgGy621985: Not if the game does something impressive with it.

I agree, but so far Ubisoft failed to demonstrate it.

I mean, let's just be realistic. If AMD's Jaguar APU can run Watch Dogs, why the hell would you have to own i7? Running at 3.5/4 GHz? Bullshit.

Avatar image for ReadingRainbow4
ReadingRainbow4

18733

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#16  Edited By ReadingRainbow4
Member since 2012 • 18733 Posts

It's gotta be that Wind simulation that's requiring an i7, lol. Aka ubisoft blowing hot air out their ass.

Avatar image for tonitorsi
tonitorsi

8692

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 10

User Lists: 0

#17  Edited By tonitorsi
Member since 2006 • 8692 Posts

i7?

Avatar image for deactivated-5cd08b1605da1
deactivated-5cd08b1605da1

9317

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 27

User Lists: 0

#18 deactivated-5cd08b1605da1
Member since 2012 • 9317 Posts

@IMAHAPYHIPPO said:

@IgGy621985: Not if the game does something impressive with it. People's constant bitching about how much worse the ps4 version looks than the PC demonstration at e3 seems to suggest it will.

Again, theres no way to know that was actually a PC demo and not a pre-rendered video. Alien: CM anyone?

Avatar image for Krelian-co
Krelian-co

13274

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#19 Krelian-co
Member since 2006 • 13274 Posts

i can bet they will then blame it on piracy

Avatar image for jman1553
jman1553

1332

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#20 jman1553
Member since 2009 • 1332 Posts

@IgGy621985: An i7? What sort of game would require an i7?

Ubisoft has been bad with this sort of thing for quite a while. Look at AC IV

Avatar image for IMAHAPYHIPPO
IMAHAPYHIPPO

4194

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 10

User Lists: 0

#21 IMAHAPYHIPPO
Member since 2004 • 4194 Posts
@IgGy621985 said:

@IMAHAPYHIPPO said:

@IgGy621985: Not if the game does something impressive with it.

I agree, but so far Ubisoft failed to demonstrate it.

I mean, let's just be realistic. If AMD's Jaguar APU can run Watch Dogs, why the hell would you have to own i7? Running at 3.5/4 GHz? Bullshit.

You don't need an i7, it's recommended you have an i7. Until the game comes out, we won't know what that means. It's stated you can run the game with something less than an i7, so who's to say a game of this scale isn't going to have a crazy amount of customization options that would really test your PC with everything cranked up?

Avatar image for killatwill15
killatwill15

855

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 5

#22 killatwill15
Member since 2013 • 855 Posts

un-optimised game is un-optimised,

ubisoft have been known to shit onto computers and pass it off as pc ports.

I bet that not even the gta 5 pc port will be this bad.

Avatar image for IMAHAPYHIPPO
IMAHAPYHIPPO

4194

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 10

User Lists: 0

#23 IMAHAPYHIPPO
Member since 2004 • 4194 Posts

@Vatusus said:

@IMAHAPYHIPPO said:

@IgGy621985: Not if the game does something impressive with it. People's constant bitching about how much worse the ps4 version looks than the PC demonstration at e3 seems to suggest it will.

Again, theres no way to know that was actually a PC demo and not a pre-rendered video. Alien: CM anyone?

It very well could be, but we don't know for sure, which is why we shouldn't talk about anything like it's a definite and claim there's absolutely no reason a game should require a high end CPU other than a poor porting job. The only thing we know right now is Ubisoft recommends we have an i7, and graphics have been all over the place in demonstrations. We know nothing further.

Avatar image for glez13
glez13

10309

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#24  Edited By glez13
Member since 2006 • 10309 Posts

I'm expecting a sloppy port job like Rockstar did with GTA4. Consoles have eight cores thus your PC needs eight cores.

Avatar image for IgGy621985
IgGy621985

5922

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#25 IgGy621985
Member since 2004 • 5922 Posts

@IMAHAPYHIPPO said:
@IgGy621985 said:

@IMAHAPYHIPPO said:

@IgGy621985: Not if the game does something impressive with it.

I agree, but so far Ubisoft failed to demonstrate it.

I mean, let's just be realistic. If AMD's Jaguar APU can run Watch Dogs, why the hell would you have to own i7? Running at 3.5/4 GHz? Bullshit.

You don't need an i7, it's recommended you have an i7. Until the game comes out, we won't know what that means. It's stated you can run the game with something less than an i7, so who's to say a game of this scale isn't going to have a crazy amount of customization options that would really test your PC with everything cranked up?

Regardless, it's still a big indication of how "well" Ubisoft did the optimization job for the PC version.

Also, what do you think how will people react when they see system requirements on the backside of the box? I'm talking about people that don't usually visit gaming forums like this one. They won't buy the game, or they'll simply purchase a console version.

And of course, Ubisoft will drop the classic "IT WAS TEH 95% PIRACY" argument when the PC version sells like shit.

Avatar image for p3anut
p3anut

6609

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#26 p3anut
Member since 2005 • 6609 Posts

I meet all the recommended requirements but still not getting the game day one. Will wait until it gets cheap in a couple of months.

Avatar image for Cranler
Cranler

8809

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#27 Cranler
Member since 2005 • 8809 Posts

@IgGy621985 said:

@IMAHAPYHIPPO said:

@IgGy621985: Not if the game does something impressive with it.

I agree, but so far Ubisoft failed to demonstrate it.

I mean, let's just be realistic. If AMD's Jaguar APU can run Watch Dogs, why the hell would you have to own i7? Running at 3.5/4 GHz? Bullshit.

You don't have to own an i7 because it's the recommended not the minimum. Recommended is obviously for settings beyond the console versions.

Avatar image for Mozelleple112
Mozelleple112

11001

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 5

User Lists: 0

#28 Mozelleple112
Member since 2011 • 11001 Posts

I feel sorry for the people who spent a couple grand or more on Alienware/Asus/MSI laptops that only come with quad core CPUs :p

Avatar image for lostrib
lostrib

49999

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#29 lostrib
Member since 2009 • 49999 Posts

Reminds of the "requirements" IW put out for COD Ghosts

Avatar image for IMAHAPYHIPPO
IMAHAPYHIPPO

4194

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 10

User Lists: 0

#30 IMAHAPYHIPPO
Member since 2004 • 4194 Posts

@IgGy621985 said:

@IMAHAPYHIPPO said:
@IgGy621985 said:

@IMAHAPYHIPPO said:

@IgGy621985: Not if the game does something impressive with it.

I agree, but so far Ubisoft failed to demonstrate it.

I mean, let's just be realistic. If AMD's Jaguar APU can run Watch Dogs, why the hell would you have to own i7? Running at 3.5/4 GHz? Bullshit.

You don't need an i7, it's recommended you have an i7. Until the game comes out, we won't know what that means. It's stated you can run the game with something less than an i7, so who's to say a game of this scale isn't going to have a crazy amount of customization options that would really test your PC with everything cranked up?

Regardless, it's still a big indication of how "well" Ubisoft did the optimization job for the PC version.

Also, what do you think how will people react when they see system requirements on the backside of the box? I'm talking about people that don't usually visit gaming forums like this one. They won't buy the game, or they'll simply purchase a console version.

And of course, Ubisoft will drop the classic "IT WAS TEH 95% PIRACY" argument when the PC version sells like shit.

It could be an indication, but we won't know until May. There's still a chance those recommended settings are in place because the game offers a ridiculous amount of customization. Only the people directly working on the game know for sure, and I for one have never had any problems with Ubisoft games on PC before. I remember how much better Far Cry 3 looked on PC at max settings.

It's such a bummer how much negative press this game has gotten since it got delayed. This was probably the most hyped title last fall.

Avatar image for jhonMalcovich
jhonMalcovich

7090

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#31  Edited By jhonMalcovich
Member since 2010 • 7090 Posts

Since when a CPU ever played a major role in game´s requirements ? Never. Plain and simple.

An quad-core and an i5 will be enough. You´d better focus on having a good GPU.

An i5 with 4-core plus 2-processes per core acts as AMD´s 8-core processors and even better.

AMD 8-core processor is not actually a true 8-core as those 8 cores can not work simultaneously, but they need to synchronize themselves, as they share some common resources. Those cores are mostly used to schedule tasks, not to execute them at the same time.

In real life, Intel´s 4-core, 8 processes >= AMD´s 8-cores

/thread

Avatar image for DealRogers
DealRogers

4589

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#32 DealRogers
Member since 2005 • 4589 Posts

Recommended is always halfway to Ultra requirements, so it means you need an i7 4960x for top quality? BS.

Avatar image for commander
commander

16217

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 11

User Lists: 0

#33 commander
Member since 2010 • 16217 Posts

Could this be because the consoles have 8 threads.

If that's the case, i better hurry up and sell my i5

Avatar image for Sharp-Shooter89
Sharp-Shooter89

128

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#34 Sharp-Shooter89
Member since 2012 • 128 Posts

guys do not take system requirements seriously, ever, just make sure you have a decent machine and you should have a decent experience, i seen pc's below recommended max games, and i also seen pc's past recommended struggle with games "GTA4"

Avatar image for uninspiredcup
uninspiredcup

58266

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 86

User Lists: 2

#35 uninspiredcup
Member since 2013 • 58266 Posts

4gb of that is for Uplay.

Avatar image for FinalFighters
FinalFighters

3410

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#36 FinalFighters
Member since 2013 • 3410 Posts

Oh crap..well, looks like i gotta get the console version now -__-

Avatar image for I_can_haz
I_can_haz

6511

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#38 I_can_haz
Member since 2013 • 6511 Posts

My PC can handle it. Too bad I just don't care for this game at all.

Avatar image for uninspiredcup
uninspiredcup

58266

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 86

User Lists: 2

#39 uninspiredcup
Member since 2013 • 58266 Posts

@I_can_haz said:

My PC can handle it. Too bad I just don't care for this game at all.

Agreed. Casual press X to win game. Most likely boring as 20 minutes.

Avatar image for foxhound_fox
foxhound_fox

98532

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 13

User Lists: 0

#40 foxhound_fox
Member since 2005 • 98532 Posts

@clyde46 said:

An i7? Not surprising given that this is an open world game with (I hope) lots of AI calculations.

i7 is essentially unnecessary even for the most demanding of games. You could run a copy of Crysis at max while rendering video in the background on an i7.

Avatar image for turtlethetaffer
turtlethetaffer

18973

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 144

User Lists: 0

#41 turtlethetaffer
Member since 2009 • 18973 Posts

Wait, so now a PC gamer is complaining that a PC game is too powerful?

Avatar image for nyzma23
nyzma23

1003

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#42  Edited By nyzma23
Member since 2013 • 1003 Posts

6 gb memmory and 64 bit only well good luck selling it ubisoft you just followed activision path with bloated cod ghost .after good ac4 port for pc now you make a fucking mess with watchdog and i'm not counting your buggy uplay mandatory

Avatar image for kalipekona
kalipekona

2492

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#43 kalipekona
Member since 2003 • 2492 Posts

@with_teeth26 said:

GPU requirement are modest enough but yea those are some steep CPU requirements. I'm not too worried though, I'm sure my OC'd 2500k can handle it.

I hope my i5 2500k can handle it. The graphics card requirements are surprisingly low. We'll see, though. Recommended specs are one thing, the way the game actually performs is another.

Avatar image for glez13
glez13

10309

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#44 glez13
Member since 2006 • 10309 Posts

@turtlethetaffer said:

Wait, so now a PC gamer is complaining that a PC game is too powerful?

Nope. They don't trust Ubi and are arguing that probably they will deliver an unoptimized POS.

Avatar image for Primordialous
Primordialous

1313

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#45 Primordialous
Member since 2012 • 1313 Posts

If you think that's ridiculous, just take a look at Star Citizen's current Dogfighting Module reqs (for 1080p, High settings, 40+ FPS):

New Haswell i7 arround the 4770k

16GB RAM @1600MHZ

GTX 680 or better

SSD hard drive

Source: https://forums.robertsspaceindustries.com/discussion/comment/2145055/#Comment_2145055

Avatar image for topgunmv
topgunmv

10880

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#46 topgunmv
Member since 2003 • 10880 Posts

@Primordialous said:

If you think that's ridiculous, just take a look at Star Citizen's current Dogfighting Module reqs (for 1080p, High settings, 40+ FPS):

New Haswell i7 arround the 4770k

16GB RAM @1600MHZ

GTX 680 or better

SSD hard drive

Source: https://forums.robertsspaceindustries.com/discussion/comment/2145055/#Comment_2145055

I wonder what you need for ultra.

Avatar image for CrownKingArthur
CrownKingArthur

5262

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#47 CrownKingArthur
Member since 2013 • 5262 Posts

i think those requirements are fine. a core i5 is just below recommended, but well above minimum.

core i5 vs intel core 2 q8400

although i think these requirements are fine, the recommended gpu seems low, the recommended cpu seems steep.

Avatar image for Spartan070
Spartan070

16497

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#48 Spartan070
Member since 2004 • 16497 Posts

PC Gamers are always harping about games not pushing the power of the PC, one truly does, gamers complain that reqs are too high?

Does not compute...

Avatar image for Mr-Kutaragi
Mr-Kutaragi

2466

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#49 Mr-Kutaragi
Member since 2013 • 2466 Posts

Wow. Maybe ubi DRM and bad optimization accounts for this lol.

Avatar image for napo_sp
napo_sp

649

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#50 napo_sp
Member since 2006 • 649 Posts

@Primordialous said:

If you think that's ridiculous, just take a look at Star Citizen's current Dogfighting Module reqs (for 1080p, High settings, 40+ FPS):

New Haswell i7 arround the 4770k

16GB RAM @1600MHZ

GTX 680 or better

SSD hard drive

Source: https://forums.robertsspaceindustries.com/discussion/comment/2145055/#Comment_2145055

this!