[QUOTE="CubeJL"][QUOTE="avenger_dot"][QUOTE="CubeJL"]It's all so insignificant really...to me, it looks the same. The thing is, after E3 2005, no one thought we'd be having this discussion about the "possibility" of PS3 games looking better than 360 games at some point. The fact that we are should say something...avenger_dot
You do understand PS3 run no AA like 360 does, that would bring its frame rate down to 1fps !!!
Perhaps..but my point still stands--not only are we debating about an almost indistinguishable difference in graphics quality in this particular game, we have seen counltess other ports which look better on the 360. Who would have thought...
I agree, not only that but it had a whole more year to tailor for PS3, and they came up with only some better textures in the far away lands, that 360 gets too, but failed to even have AA as 360 has !!! or all DL content at once
PS3 is really laughable as a 600$ machine, it is barely a 300$ one comparing to 360
Yeah, I hate to say it (actually I don't), but the PS3 in terms of a gaming machine aught to be less expensive than the 360 at this point.
Log in to comment