Obvious Title for SW, more fun to fuel the fire:D
http://au.ign.com/articles/2012/10/15/the-unfinished-swan-review
Don"t really care about the title but nice PSN has another what looks to be pretty decent game.
This topic is locked from further discussion.
Ever since the whole pokemon thing i have now decided that ign reviews are the only reviews that should be counted here.
[QUOTE="Meeeper282"]Go to the IGN forums then.Ever since the whole pokemon thing i have now decided that ign reviews are the only reviews that should be counted here.
GhoX
More chance of half life 3 coming out then me doing that
"Only reviews I agree with should be counted."Ever since the whole pokemon thing i have now decided that ign reviews are the only reviews that should be counted here.
Meeeper282
So if they give the next Pokemon a 3/10 should they still be the only ones that count?
I thought PS3 fanboys insisted that arcade/PSN titles didn't count? Cause they would get destroyed.
immortality20
Indeed, Dust Elysian Tale is a bigger game than 99% of PS3 retail exclusives (and a more deep and amazing one too)
That game alone would render PS3 useless
"Only reviews I agree with should be counted."[QUOTE="Meeeper282"]
Ever since the whole pokemon thing i have now decided that ign reviews are the only reviews that should be counted here.
Vaasman
So if they give the next Pokemon a 3/10 should they still be the only ones that count?
Doubt they will, ign has a history of rating pokemon highly
Pokemon Conquest 9.0
Pokemon Conquest 6.5 (here)
Pokemon black 9.0
Pokemon black 7.5 (here)
Pokemon Black 2 9.6
Pokemon Black 2 6.5 (here)
Gamespot trolling as usual
"Only reviews I agree with should be counted."[QUOTE="Vaasman"]
[QUOTE="Meeeper282"]
Ever since the whole pokemon thing i have now decided that ign reviews are the only reviews that should be counted here.
Meeeper282
So if they give the next Pokemon a 3/10 should they still be the only ones that count?
Doubt they will, ign has a history of rating pokemon highly
Pokemon Conquest 9.0
Pokemon Conquest 6.5 (here)
Pokemon black 9.0
Pokemon black 7.5 (here)
Pokemon Black 2 9.6
Pokemon Black 2 6.5 (here)
Gamespot trolling as usual
It's purely a hypothetical situation. If they score it poorly, would you still count their reviews?[QUOTE="charizard1605"]Let's wait for the GS score...GiancarThis. And come on, people are using Fable: Journey only to make fun of PS3 fanboys with the metagame. I really doubt people are genuinely hyped for it. While I do not own a Kinect and have no desire for the game but there are clearly many people that do enjoy Kinect. I am sure many will enjoy Fable.
[QUOTE="Giancar"][QUOTE="charizard1605"]Let's wait for the GS score...CanYouDigltThis. And come on, people are using Fable: Journey only to make fun of PS3 fanboys with the metagame. I really doubt people are genuinely hyped for it. While I do not own a Kinect and have no desire for the game but there are clearly many people that do enjoy Kinect. I am sure many will enjoy Fable. many people? here? Not at all. The only one that hyped was loosingENDS
Fable is on 360.Great, more movie games with simple gameplay. Doesn't the PS3 have enough of these?
GD1551
Looks interesting, glad to see another solid title on PSN.
I find it funny how Lems praise Trials: Evolution and Mark of the Ninja to no end, but as soon as PSN gets a good title they write it off cause it's a downloadable game. It's really double standards from both Cows and Lems, I'm sure there were Cows trashing those XBLA games even though they got good scores.
If I want a story book, I'll pick one up off my childrens' shelf and read it to them.
I'll pass thanks.... and to be as deuchey as possible here's a SW appropriate comment....
"GEEE... dem cows sure do likes deir stories"
most cows here have always claimed that downloadable games dont count. then they get a good one and suddenly it matters.Looks interesting, glad to see another solid title on PSN.
I find it funny how Lems praise Trials: Evolution and Mark of the Ninja to no end, but as soon as PSN gets a good title they write it off cause it's a downloadable game. It's really double standards from both Cows and Lems, I'm sure there were Cows trashing those XBLA games even though they got good scores.
-Patrick_92-
[QUOTE="-Patrick_92-"]most cows here have always claimed that downloadable games dont count. then they get a good one and suddenly it matters.Looks interesting, glad to see another solid title on PSN.
I find it funny how Lems praise Trials: Evolution and Mark of the Ninja to no end, but as soon as PSN gets a good title they write it off cause it's a downloadable game. It's really double standards from both Cows and Lems, I'm sure there were Cows trashing those XBLA games even though they got good scores.
mems_1224
Same for Lems, but yeah funny how it suddenly changes up so quickly. Will PSN and Arcade ever be included?
most cows here have always claimed that downloadable games dont count. then they get a good one and suddenly it matters.[QUOTE="mems_1224"][QUOTE="-Patrick_92-"]
Looks interesting, glad to see another solid title on PSN.
I find it funny how Lems praise Trials: Evolution and Mark of the Ninja to no end, but as soon as PSN gets a good title they write it off cause it's a downloadable game. It's really double standards from both Cows and Lems, I'm sure there were Cows trashing those XBLA games even though they got good scores.
Blake135
Same for Lems, but yeah funny how it suddenly changes up so quickly. Will PSN and Arcade ever be included?
I do feel that PSN and Arcade games are judged differently then $60 titles, seems like scores seem to be on the higher side for downloadable games. I wouldn't care either way if they counted or not, I don't get wrapped up in these metagames in SW.[QUOTE="immortality20"]
I thought PS3 fanboys insisted that arcade/PSN titles didn't count? Cause they would get destroyed.
loosingENDS
Indeed, Dust Elysian Tale is a bigger game than 99% of PS3 retail exclusives (and a more deep and amazing one too)
That game alone would render PS3 useless
Trash game made for furries. Couldn't even crack AA at a $15 price point. A true joke.[QUOTE="Blake135"][QUOTE="mems_1224"] most cows here have always claimed that downloadable games dont count. then they get a good one and suddenly it matters. -Patrick_92-
Same for Lems, but yeah funny how it suddenly changes up so quickly. Will PSN and Arcade ever be included?
I do feel that PSN and Arcade games are judged differently then $60 titles, seems like scores seem to be on the higher side for downloadable games. I wouldn't care either way if they counted or not, I don't get wrapped up in these metagames in SW. i agree its just fun to poke fun at cows when they completely ignore awesome games like mark of the ninja, trials and fez and then blow their load when a good psn game comes out.[QUOTE="-Patrick_92-"][QUOTE="Blake135"]I do feel that PSN and Arcade games are judged differently then $60 titles, seems like scores seem to be on the higher side for downloadable games. I wouldn't care either way if they counted or not, I don't get wrapped up in these metagames in SW. i agree its just fun to poke fun at cows when they completely ignore awesome games like mark of the ninja, trials and fez and then blow their load when a good psn game comes out.It goes both ways really, Lems are just as bad as Cows. Both factions are dumb, spending more time talking about the who has the better games instead of just playing them.Same for Lems, but yeah funny how it suddenly changes up so quickly. Will PSN and Arcade ever be included?
mems_1224
Dude.. Lemmings would LOVE to use Arcade games.. show me a lemming that would say otherwise .. its every other faction (including Hermits for some reason.. though they love their steam :roll: ) that don't want to count them.Looks interesting, glad to see another solid title on PSN.
I find it funny how Lems praise Trials: Evolution and Mark of the Ninja to no end, but as soon as PSN gets a good title they write it off cause it's a downloadable game. It's really double standards from both Cows and Lems, I'm sure there were Cows trashing those XBLA games even though they got good scores.
-Patrick_92-
[QUOTE="-Patrick_92-"]Dude.. Lemmings would LOVE to use Arcade games.. show me a lemming that would say otherwise .. its every other faction (including Hermits for some reason.. though they love their steam :roll: ) that don't want to count them. I don't care about the metagame, I'm just talking about people in this thread bashing it for being downloadable, and saying it's not a real game or "just another movie game". A good game is good, and people shouldn't just write it off when they will turn around and praise XBLA titles, and same goes to Cows when the situation is reversed.Looks interesting, glad to see another solid title on PSN.
I find it funny how Lems praise Trials: Evolution and Mark of the Ninja to no end, but as soon as PSN gets a good title they write it off cause it's a downloadable game. It's really double standards from both Cows and Lems, I'm sure there were Cows trashing those XBLA games even though they got good scores.
OhSnapitz
So a downloadable game, Wonderbook, and AC3 DLC are PS3s big exclusives this year. Karma and irony if I've ever seen it.JohnnyCageMK
far cry dlc and little big planet karting :lol:
Please Log In to post.
Log in to comment