I Really liked 40th day for my PSP. Very cool top down arcade stye shooter. I don't remember it being super short.
This topic is locked from further discussion.
Halo 3 ODLC: 3 hours. maybe more if playing on the highesst difficulty, but only if you are playing solo. also, weren't critics saying that homefront was incredibly short?antifanboyftwAre you quoting Angry Joe with your Halo ODLC.
Nice thread. I got Kane n Lynch 2 for 5 bucks on steam so it wasn't too much of a loss. But it's really surprising that even in only 4 hours the game gets repetitive. And no one seems to go online anymore.
It's really sad to see so many games from this generation on there. It really says a lot about this current gen. majadamusWhat it says is that the author of the list was only bothering with newer games. SMB in 5 minutes. SMB3 in 11 minutes. Contra 3 in 16 minutes. Fallout in 9 minutes. Morrowind in 6 or 7 minutes... Sure, those are speed runs, but the fact is games aren't any shorter than they ever were. Action games (such as shooters) may only average 6-10 hours for a single playthrough... but action games have ALWAYS averaged a few hours. RPGs now can be pretty short if you power straight through and ignore all the sidequests and stuff... but they have ALWAYS been like that. The whole "games this gen are too short" thing is one of the most inane recurring arguments ever. That and "Games cost too much this gen."
Star Fox 64 is only a 45 min. game.
Luckily it was fun to play over and over and over again.
Heck if you want to take into account of being able to take an alt. route, then double it.
It's still only an hour and a half.
[QUOTE="rzepak"]fear 2 took me plenty of time, by the looks of it, you play games way too fast.The list fails. FEAR 2 is 5h long, BO is 4h long, MW2 is 4h long, Mirrors Edge is 3h long. There are a ton of games like. Quite frankly most games are around 5 hours now.
dakan45
I dont rush through games if thats what you mean. Maybe Im just awesome.
I wonder how many games the write has played. Way of the Samurai was a strictly single player game, and it was 40 minutes long.
I know for a fact that Pokemon Snap lasted me much, much longer than hour back when I played it. Awesome game. Fable as well, I would have easily clocked 30 hours+ into it.
Where's Black Ops, my friend beated in 1.5 hour on veteran. But he's a Cod freak that accumulated over 2400 on Cod4.
Should speed runs even be considered? It sounds pointless to use those since a heck of alot of games can be done this way. Playing it normally as the dev intended should be what it is when talking about length if you ask me, though SRs are pretty neat in general.
of thecurrent gen id agree with that list, overall that list isnt correct though, in particular i remember there is a ps2 game that if you make a certain choice you can beat the game in like 10 minutes, i think it was the way of the samurai or warrior or something like that?
Where's every Call of Duty starting from 4?
Also, I don't want to sound like a douche, but I think this should've been a blog. Just saying.
This list should make it to the "Top 10 most stupid list ever made" because I can find 10 games shorter than any of those.
I think all of uscan.
Why isn't MGS4 on there? which can be beat in a little over an hour if you ignore all the cutscenes?
Please Log In to post.
Log in to comment