Textures and AA in PS3 Oblivion are laughable !!!

  • 152 results
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4

This topic is locked from further discussion.

Avatar image for avenger_dot
avenger_dot

804

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#1 avenger_dot
Member since 2007 • 804 Posts

The load times would be slower, if they did not duplicate the game on the BR disk !!! They said themselves, plus they had a whole year to optimize loading times anyway

The patch is coming to 360, so no big deal here

And the DL content still does not fit in PS3 ram !!!

Plus the game has less AA, and FAR worst textures, notice the lower res grass that looks blurry, nothing like 360 version ? The lower res textures on rocks and the fallen tree ? Just a huge downgrade here

Avatar image for Thug_Pikachu
Thug_Pikachu

4725

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#2 Thug_Pikachu
Member since 2006 • 4725 Posts
WTF . is that real ? if so WTF that looks horrible.
Avatar image for mish55
mish55

6995

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 64

User Lists: 0

#3 mish55
Member since 2005 • 6995 Posts
thats how oblivion looks on an sdtv...............not ps3
Avatar image for Kahuna_1
Kahuna_1

7948

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#4 Kahuna_1
Member since 2006 • 7948 Posts
lol ign and gs said the ps3 version looks better, runs smoother, and loads faster
Avatar image for Wasdie
Wasdie

53622

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 23

User Lists: 0

#6 Wasdie  Moderator
Member since 2003 • 53622 Posts
Both IGN and Gamespot said themselves that the game looked better. You cannot argue with people who have actually sat down and played the game for themselves.
Avatar image for EarthShakeNews
EarthShakeNews

87

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#7 EarthShakeNews
Member since 2007 • 87 Posts
http://qarl.betteroblivion.com/ba03.gif


Avatar image for TekkenMaster606
TekkenMaster606

10980

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 4

User Lists: 0

#8 TekkenMaster606
Member since 2006 • 10980 Posts
This thread defines the term 'graphics w....'


Avatar image for EarthShakeNews
EarthShakeNews

87

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#9 EarthShakeNews
Member since 2007 • 87 Posts
Both IGN and Gamespot said themselves that the game looked better. You cannot argue with people who have actually sat down and played the game for themselves.Wasdie
well not surprised it should look better. 1 year longer in development.
Avatar image for Thug_Pikachu
Thug_Pikachu

4725

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#10 Thug_Pikachu
Member since 2006 • 4725 Posts
thats how oblivion looks on an sdtv...............not ps3mish55
no it isnt . I've seen it on a SDTV
Avatar image for jacjase
jacjase

210

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#11 jacjase
Member since 2006 • 210 Posts

umm the ps3s version has better textures and data can be cached to the hard drive unlike the 360 version so 256mb RAM is enough for ps3...512mb total if you count it all ah then theres the hard drive that each ps3 comes with standard allowing for devs to cache data to it unlike the 360

Avatar image for avenger_dot
avenger_dot

804

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#12 avenger_dot
Member since 2007 • 804 Posts

lol ign and gs said the ps3 version looks better, runs smoother, and loads fasterKahuna_1

Then they prove it, with those horrible pics ??? Check the textures, and blury grass, just looks bad

Avatar image for Felous1
Felous1

4557

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#13 Felous1
Member since 2006 • 4557 Posts
http://qarl.betteroblivion.com/ba03.gif


EarthShakeNews
What the hell is that ?
Avatar image for EarthShakeNews
EarthShakeNews

87

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#14 EarthShakeNews
Member since 2007 • 87 Posts

[QUOTE="Kahuna_1"]lol ign and gs said the ps3 version looks better, runs smoother, and loads fasteravenger_dot

Then they prove it, with those horrible pics ??? Check the textures, and blury grass, just looks bad

http://ps3media.ign.com/ps3/image/article/761/761902/the-elder-scrolls-iv-oblivion-20070206022220234.jpg why did you not post this picture? there is better detail in distance textures
Avatar image for Shirley_Temple
Shirley_Temple

5927

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#15 Shirley_Temple
Member since 2006 • 5927 Posts
Wow, that looks like someone put the PC version on minimum settings
Avatar image for Felous1
Felous1

4557

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#16 Felous1
Member since 2006 • 4557 Posts
why did you not post this picture? there is better detail in distance texturesEarthShakeNews
That is also being updated for the 360.
Avatar image for EarthShakeNews
EarthShakeNews

87

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#17 EarthShakeNews
Member since 2007 • 87 Posts
[QUOTE="EarthShakeNews"]http://qarl.betteroblivion.com/ba03.gif


Felous1
What the hell is that ?

it's an PC oblivion mod to improve every texture in the game. and my it god it makes the PS3 and Xbox 360 version look like horse ****

http://devnull.devakm.googlepages.com/totoworld

then agian you can't run the PS3 or the xbox 360 version with 32x AA, 16x AF,

at 2069x1600 and with 4096p textures.
Avatar image for EarthShakeNews
EarthShakeNews

87

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#18 EarthShakeNews
Member since 2007 • 87 Posts
[QUOTE="EarthShakeNews"]why did you not post this picture? there is better detail in distance texturesFelous1
That is also being updated for the 360.

That is good news ^_^
Avatar image for tonyleo01
tonyleo01

2255

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#19 tonyleo01
Member since 2004 • 2255 Posts
[QUOTE="avenger_dot"]

[QUOTE="Kahuna_1"]lol ign and gs said the ps3 version looks better, runs smoother, and loads fasterEarthShakeNews

Then they prove it, with those horrible pics ??? Check the textures, and blury grass, just looks bad

http://ps3media.ign.com/ps3/image/article/761/761902/the-elder-scrolls-iv-oblivion-20070206022220234.jpg why did you not post this picture? there is better detail in distance textures

maybe there're more trees, but don't see that much difference from the 360 ver.
Avatar image for Kahuna_1
Kahuna_1

7948

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#20 Kahuna_1
Member since 2006 • 7948 Posts

[QUOTE="Felous1"][QUOTE="EarthShakeNews"]http://qarl.betteroblivion.com/ba03.gif


EarthShakeNews
What the hell is that ?

it's an PC oblivion mod to improve every texture in the game. and my it god it makes the PS3 and Xbox 360 version look like horse ****

http://devnull.devakm.googlepages.com/totoworld

then agian you can't run the PS3 or the xbox 360 version with 32x AA, 16x AF,

at 2069x1600 and with 4096p textures.

jeez...one hell of a setup

Avatar image for MrGrimFandango
MrGrimFandango

5286

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#21 MrGrimFandango
Member since 2005 • 5286 Posts

[QUOTE="Felous1"][QUOTE="EarthShakeNews"]http://qarl.betteroblivion.com/ba03.gif


EarthShakeNews
What the hell is that ?

it's an PC oblivion mod to improve every texture in the game. and my it god it makes the PS3 and Xbox 360 version look like horse ****

http://devnull.devakm.googlepages.com/totoworld

then agian you can't run the PS3 or the xbox 360 version with 32x AA, 16x AF,

at 2069x1600 and with 4096p textures.

Whats exact name of that mod and does it require a lot more powerful computer than standard oblivion? or is it better optimized.

Avatar image for aar0n90
aar0n90

25

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#22 aar0n90
Member since 2007 • 25 Posts
seriously that screenshot sucks. ive seen screenshots on gamespot that look far worse then in-game. its the way there taken. i know for a fact that ps3 oblivion looks far better than that. far far better.
Avatar image for craigx42
craigx42

108

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#23 craigx42
Member since 2004 • 108 Posts

ign already said the ps3 version will look better than 360s and load faster.

you fanboys fail at logic

Avatar image for EarthShakeNews
EarthShakeNews

87

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#24 EarthShakeNews
Member since 2007 • 87 Posts

[QUOTE="EarthShakeNews"][QUOTE="Felous1"][QUOTE="EarthShakeNews"]http://qarl.betteroblivion.com/ba03.gif


MrGrimFandango

What the hell is that ?

it's an PC oblivion mod to improve every texture in the game. and my it god it makes the PS3 and Xbox 360 version look like horse ****

http://devnull.devakm.googlepages.com/totoworld

then agian you can't run the PS3 or the xbox 360 version with 32x AA, 16x AF,

at 2069x1600 and with 4096p textures.

Whats exact name of that mod and does it require a lot more powerful computer than standard oblivion? or is it better optimized.

http://devnull.devakm.googlepages.com/totoworld Link tells all.
Avatar image for the-very-best
the-very-best

14486

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 4

User Lists: 0

#25 the-very-best
Member since 2006 • 14486 Posts
I don't see how this is debatable if both GS and IGN have gone on record stating that the PS3 version of the game is superior.
Avatar image for vistamanV5
vistamanV5

957

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#26 vistamanV5
Member since 2005 • 957 Posts

umm the ps3s version has better textures and data can be cached to the hard drive unlike the 360 version so 256mb RAM is enough for ps3...512mb total if you count it all ah then theres the hard drive that each ps3 comes with standard allowing for devs to cache data to it unlike the 360

jacjase
Actually when the game sees there is hard drive no the 360, it does cache to it to help load times. Look it up.
Avatar image for craigx42
craigx42

108

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#27 craigx42
Member since 2004 • 108 Posts
I don't see how this is debatable if both GS and IGN have gone on record stating that the PS3 version of the game is superior.the-very-best
yes 360 fanboys just got owned
Avatar image for jnerd
jNerd

7598

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 8

User Lists: 0

#28 jNerd
Member since 2005 • 7598 Posts
He just found the worst pics he could, I think the PS3 is a peice of Goomba crap but I won't lie when it comes to it's ub3r superior graphix.
Avatar image for miss_kitt3n
miss_kitt3n

2717

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#29 miss_kitt3n
Member since 2006 • 2717 Posts
[QUOTE="Felous1"][QUOTE="EarthShakeNews"]http://qarl.betteroblivion.com/ba03.gif


EarthShakeNews
What the hell is that ?

it's an PC oblivion mod to improve every texture in the game. and my it god it makes the PS3 and Xbox 360 version look like horse ****

http://devnull.devakm.googlepages.com/totoworld

then agian you can't run the PS3 or the xbox 360 version with 32x AA, 16x AF,

at 2069x1600 and with 4096p textures.



Gamespot must have been on crack when they said 360 version>>> PC version
Avatar image for EarthShakeNews
EarthShakeNews

87

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#30 EarthShakeNews
Member since 2007 • 87 Posts
[QUOTE="EarthShakeNews"][QUOTE="Felous1"][QUOTE="EarthShakeNews"]http://qarl.betteroblivion.com/ba03.gif


miss_kitt3n
What the hell is that ?

it's an PC oblivion mod to improve every texture in the game. and my it god it makes the PS3 and Xbox 360 version look like horse ****

http://devnull.devakm.googlepages.com/totoworld

then agian you can't run the PS3 or the xbox 360 version with 32x AA, 16x AF,

at 2069x1600 and with 4096p textures.



Gamespot must have been on crack when they said 360 version>>> PC version

Well this the PC version with mods. They must have compared Xbox 360 version with a PC version with no mods whatsoever
Avatar image for avenger_dot
avenger_dot

804

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#31 avenger_dot
Member since 2007 • 804 Posts

ign already said the ps3 version will look better than 360s and load faster.

you fanboys fail at logic

craigx42

No, it will not look better, the new shader comes to 360 too, but it already looks worst in near textures by far, check the trees, grass, armor and rocks, nothing close to 360 detail tehre

Avatar image for Blinblingthing
Blinblingthing

6943

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#32 Blinblingthing
Member since 2005 • 6943 Posts

[QUOTE="Wasdie"]Both IGN and Gamespot said themselves that the game looked better. You cannot argue with people who have actually sat down and played the game for themselves.EarthShakeNews
well not surprised it should look better. 1 year longer in development.

So you know when Dev time started and ended then???? can I get some links

Avatar image for Blinblingthing
Blinblingthing

6943

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#33 Blinblingthing
Member since 2005 • 6943 Posts
[QUOTE="craigx42"]

ign already said the ps3 version will look better than 360s and load faster.

you fanboys fail at logic

avenger_dot

No, it will not look better, the new shader comes to 360 too, but it already looks worst in near textures by far, check the trees, grass, armor and rocks, nothing close to 360 detail tehre

Gs and IGN are pretty much usually credible sources to me.

You posted two pictures???? wats that suppose to prove???

Avatar image for EarthShakeNews
EarthShakeNews

87

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#34 EarthShakeNews
Member since 2007 • 87 Posts
[QUOTE="avenger_dot"][QUOTE="craigx42"]

ign already said the ps3 version will look better than 360s and load faster.

you fanboys fail at logic

Blinblingthing

No, it will not look better, the new shader comes to 360 too, but it already looks worst in near textures by far, check the trees, grass, armor and rocks, nothing close to 360 detail tehre

Gs and IGN are pretty much usually credible sources to me.

You posted two pictures???? wats that suppose to prove???

Jeff Grustman smears Peanut butter on the Screen Captures.
Avatar image for MrGrimFandango
MrGrimFandango

5286

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#35 MrGrimFandango
Member since 2005 • 5286 Posts
[QUOTE="avenger_dot"][QUOTE="craigx42"]

ign already said the ps3 version will look better than 360s and load faster.

you fanboys fail at logic

Blinblingthing

No, it will not look better, the new shader comes to 360 too, but it already looks worst in near textures by far, check the trees, grass, armor and rocks, nothing close to 360 detail tehre

Gs and IGN are pretty much usually credible sources to me.

You posted two pictures???? wats that suppose to prove???

They are the ones you "credible sources" posted and bragged about.....

Avatar image for TheOrigin
TheOrigin

2006

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#36 TheOrigin
Member since 2004 • 2006 Posts
[QUOTE="craigx42"]

ign already said the ps3 version will look better than 360s and load faster.

you fanboys fail at logic

avenger_dot

No, it will not look better, the new shader comes to 360 too, but it already looks worst in near textures by far, check the trees, grass, armor and rocks, nothing close to 360 detail tehre

You can't argue with people who have seen the game. GS and IGN

Avatar image for Felous1
Felous1

4557

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#37 Felous1
Member since 2006 • 4557 Posts
Gs and IGN are pretty much usually credible sources to me.Blinblingthing

GameSpot had this to say, though:

"The game seemed to have a slightly smoother and more consistent frame rate than it did on the Xbox, though the difference wasn't enormous, and it seemed to us that the textures looked just a tad bit sharper."

We will see the real difference when they compare both side by side next month.
Avatar image for funnymario
funnymario

9122

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 5

User Lists: 0

#38 funnymario
Member since 2005 • 9122 Posts
[QUOTE="Wasdie"]Both IGN and Gamespot said themselves that the game looked better. You cannot argue with people who have actually sat down and played the game for themselves.EarthShakeNews
well not surprised it should look better. 1 year longer in development.

Just because they are releasing 1 year apart, doesn't mean that the ps3 had 1 year of extra dev time.
Avatar image for rahzel54
rahzel54

1732

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 11

User Lists: 0

#39 rahzel54
Member since 2004 • 1732 Posts
also, the ps3 needed the extra time simply because of the complexity of the hardware. it will get easier to develop games for the ps3 once the dev tools mature, though.
Avatar image for Blinblingthing
Blinblingthing

6943

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#40 Blinblingthing
Member since 2005 • 6943 Posts

[QUOTE="Blinblingthing"]Gs and IGN are pretty much usually credible sources to me.Felous1

GameSpot had this to say, though:

"The game seemed to have a slightly smoother and more consistent frame rate than it did on the Xbox, though the difference wasn't enormous, and it seemed to us that the textures looked just a tad bit sharper."

We will see the real difference when they compare both side by side next month.

you expect Oblivion progress to retrogress?????

i don't

Avatar image for avenger_dot
avenger_dot

804

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#41 avenger_dot
Member since 2007 • 804 Posts

[QUOTE="Blinblingthing"]Gs and IGN are pretty much usually credible sources to me.Felous1

GameSpot had this to say, though:

"The game seemed to have a slightly smoother and more consistent frame rate than it did on the Xbox, though the difference wasn't enormous, and it seemed to us that the textures looked just a tad bit sharper."

We will see the real difference when they compare both side by side next month.

See that grass, and the fallen tree, do these textures look ...sharper ...to you ?

Avatar image for Blinblingthing
Blinblingthing

6943

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#42 Blinblingthing
Member since 2005 • 6943 Posts

[QUOTE="EarthShakeNews"][QUOTE="Wasdie"]Both IGN and Gamespot said themselves that the game looked better. You cannot argue with people who have actually sat down and played the game for themselves.funnymario
well not surprised it should look better. 1 year longer in development.

Just because they are releasing 1 year apart, doesn't mean that the ps3 had 1 year of extra dev time.

can't tell you how long i've been saying this????

Avatar image for Felous1
Felous1

4557

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#43 Felous1
Member since 2006 • 4557 Posts
you expect Oblivion progress to retrogress?Blinblingthing
You can read what they said. "and it seemed to us that the textures looked just a tad bit sharper." Once they do a comparison side by side we will know for sure which one looks better. Like they did before by the end of last year. The 360 is also getting the shaders update.
Avatar image for Blinblingthing
Blinblingthing

6943

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#44 Blinblingthing
Member since 2005 • 6943 Posts

[QUOTE="Felous1"][QUOTE="Blinblingthing"]Gs and IGN are pretty much usually credible sources to me.avenger_dot


GameSpot had this to say, though:

"The game seemed to have a slightly smoother and more consistent frame rate than it did on the Xbox, though the difference wasn't enormous, and it seemed to us that the textures looked just a tad bit sharper."

We will see the real difference when they compare both side by side next month.

See that grass, and the fallen tree, do these textures look ...sharper ...to you ?

i assume you tried the game hands to be telling this?

pictures never give FULL justice

Avatar image for Felous1
Felous1

4557

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#45 Felous1
Member since 2006 • 4557 Posts
See that grass, and the fallen tree, do these textures look ...sharper ...to you ?avenger_dot
I don't see any difference on the grass but the enemy crab in one of the pictures seems a bit blurry. And there are some jaggies in some pictures as well. Just wait until next month and see if they will do a side by side comparison.
Avatar image for Kahuna_1
Kahuna_1

7948

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#46 Kahuna_1
Member since 2006 • 7948 Posts
wow everyone is arguing so much over this man...why cant 360 people say "yeah it looks nice, were gonna get an update and its gonna look nice too, so its all good" jeez people become friends
Avatar image for TheOrigin
TheOrigin

2006

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#47 TheOrigin
Member since 2004 • 2006 Posts

[QUOTE="avenger_dot"]See that grass, and the fallen tree, do these textures look ...sharper ...to you ?Felous1
I don't see any difference on the grass but the enemy crab in one of the pictures seems a bit blurry. And there are some jaggies in some pictures as well. Just wait until next month and see if they will do a side by side comparison.

To think how pointless that is.  If your first impression is " geez the PS3 version SEEMS a bit better"  then there is really no need to do a side by side seeing as no one will buy both versions.  I guess validation will help a fanboy sleep at night.

Avatar image for Felous1
Felous1

4557

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#48 Felous1
Member since 2006 • 4557 Posts
If your first impression is " geez the PS3 version SEEMS a bit better" then there is really no need to do a side by side seeing as no one will buy both versions. TheOrigin
If they were sure then there would be no need for a comparison. They used "seemed" a lot.

And by the way... GameSpot will have all the versions. :?
Avatar image for OpticalCanine
OpticalCanine

1938

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#49 OpticalCanine
Member since 2006 • 1938 Posts

umm the ps3s version has better textures and data can be cached to the hard drive unlike the 360 version so 256mb RAM is enough for ps3...512mb total if you count it all ah then theres the hard drive that each ps3 comes with standard allowing for devs to cache data to it unlike the 360

jacjase


ok but if those are PS3 screens, they are horrible compared to the 360/PC version.
Avatar image for TheOrigin
TheOrigin

2006

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#50 TheOrigin
Member since 2004 • 2006 Posts

[QUOTE="TheOrigin"] If your first impression is " geez the PS3 version SEEMS a bit better" then there is really no need to do a side by side seeing as no one will buy both versions. Felous1
If they were sure then there would be no need for a comparison. They used "seemed" a lot.

And by the way... GameSpot will have all the versions. :?

Thats why it's pointless.  Obviously the PS3 version leaves a better taste in thier mouth as far as impressions go.  But why should we argue about it.  Are PS3 owners really going to know the difference while playing? Â