Sony-Good for Gamers or Good for Themselves?

     This generation the differences between the graphical capabilities of the 360 and PS3 are negligible. So my question is why don't people realize that instead of putting a trojen horse into peoples homes in the form of the Blue Ray format, Sony could have used the extra 200-300 dollers that the Blue Ray drive costs to make on better graphical components that would have blown the 360 out of the water? Imo that would have made the PS3 actually worth 600.

     This generation the differences between the graphical capabilities of the 360 and PS3 are negligible. So my question is why don't people realize that instead of putting a trojen horse into peoples homes in the form of the Blue Ray format, Sony could have used the extra 200-300 dollers that the Blue Ray drive costs to make on better graphical components that would have blown the 360 out of the water? Imo that would have made the PS3 actually worth 600.

nosedive7

its not the terms of Graphical sony has planned this smartly not buy the price thou but if u can think 4 a second 360 has up nrly gone to the limits without the bottleneck of the Cpu now with the Cell they can actually push there gpu without bottleneckin the Cpu but the only way they can do it if the Developers would push it and find away Ram is nothing they can fiqure that out even a monkey canWhiteknight19

the ps3 was not intended as a game machine as it's paramount consideration, per Kuturagi...

it's not meant to be good for anyone but sony.....