@lundy86_4 said:
I saw that earlier. I can't really blame Sony, as i'll bet they've got things lined up for custom plates, as well as the fact that their initial name encroached on Sony's IP quite heavily. Definitely sucks, but I can't really fault Sony.
If this were Ninty just throwing lawyers at everyone, it may be different.
Doesn't really matter, unlicensed 3rd party modifications have been sold for a long time for electronics and machines. Including the faceplates for the Xbox 360. Maybe Sony want to monopolise the market, but it doesn't really hold much weight. Sony would have the harder job to prove their case.
Since when has the law been able to stop 3rd party alternatives of non invasive modifications? You could make a case against internal or external modifications which bypass anti piracy security. This is just a heavy weight corperate threat.
And they haven't really got much of a case with the name either. It could be argued either way.
"Sony's lawyers also stated that their PS5 trademark extended to the plates, which is probably correct."
They could claim the trademark extends to the electrical plug, doesn't mean it'll hold up.
Log in to comment