Sony Suicided !! ?? !!

This topic is locked from further discussion.

Avatar image for ChromeHydrolics
ChromeHydrolics

222

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#1 ChromeHydrolics
Member since 2007 • 222 Posts

Sony could make a console stronger and better than Xbox360 but it didnt WHY??????

Avatar image for Quack_Attack
Quack_Attack

2562

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#2 Quack_Attack
Member since 2005 • 2562 Posts
Do you have any understanding of "business"? Or tech specs, for that matter.
Avatar image for SmashBrosLegend
SmashBrosLegend

11344

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 4

User Lists: 0

#3 SmashBrosLegend
Member since 2006 • 11344 Posts
Because it would be even more expensive than it already is, and power is not the only thing that makes a good console.
Avatar image for jxditu
jxditu

718

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#4 jxditu
Member since 2005 • 718 Posts

Sony could make a console stronger and better than Xbox360 but it didnt WHY??????

ChromeHydrolics
cost i guess
Avatar image for gamerelite5
gamerelite5

346

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#5 gamerelite5
Member since 2007 • 346 Posts
yeah they just made it stronger too bad they decided to make it a shiny pos. even nintendo makes fun of them in loz:tp they sell magic armor for 598 rupees *it runs on them too* so once you buy it you don't get to use it since you have no money left, just like ps3.
Avatar image for Xeonz
Xeonz

1083

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#6 Xeonz
Member since 2006 • 1083 Posts

Sony could make a console stronger and better than Xbox360 but it didnt WHY??????

ChromeHydrolics
They spent too much time on Blu-Gay and The Celery processor, they were gonna develop the GPU like they did for PS2 but that was scratched off the list and they turned to nVIDIA the last moment and it costed them and came up with a mediocre GPU that doesn't even touch a 7800GTX in reality, since it's a downclocked version. They pretty much screwed up the most important part of a gaming system: the GPU.
Avatar image for MGS9150
MGS9150

2491

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#7 MGS9150
Member since 2004 • 2491 Posts
It is a more powerful machine, its just too damn expensive.
Avatar image for MGS9150
MGS9150

2491

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#8 MGS9150
Member since 2004 • 2491 Posts
[QUOTE="ChromeHydrolics"]

Sony could make a console stronger and better than Xbox360 but it didnt WHY??????

Xeonz
They spent too much time on Blu-Gay and The Celery processor, they were gonna develop the GPU like they did for PS2 but that was scratched off the list and they turned to nVIDIA the last moment and it costed them and came up with a mediocre GPU that doesn't even touch a 7800GTX in reality, since it's a downclocked version.



That is actually now true, the RSX is actually a better gpu than the xenos its just way harder to develop for because it doesnt use unified shaders. If devs spent alot of time with the RSX they could get it to pull out better graphics than the xenos.
Avatar image for -GeordiLaForge-
-GeordiLaForge-

7167

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#9 -GeordiLaForge-
Member since 2006 • 7167 Posts
It is a more powerful machine, its just too damn expensive.MGS9150
Yeah, it is more powerful. It's just much less efficient than the 360. And if you take the Cell into account, the PS3 may in fact have better graphics than the 360 one day. It'll just take a very long time.
Avatar image for ChromeHydrolics
ChromeHydrolics

222

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#10 ChromeHydrolics
Member since 2007 • 222 Posts

so wich system is more powerfull because I heard that Xbox360 is more powerfull.

Avatar image for -GeordiLaForge-
-GeordiLaForge-

7167

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#11 -GeordiLaForge-
Member since 2006 • 7167 Posts
[QUOTE="Xeonz"][QUOTE="ChromeHydrolics"]

Sony could make a console stronger and better than Xbox360 but it didnt WHY??????

MGS9150
They spent too much time on Blu-Gay and The Celery processor, they were gonna develop the GPU like they did for PS2 but that was scratched off the list and they turned to nVIDIA the last moment and it costed them and came up with a mediocre GPU that doesn't even touch a 7800GTX in reality, since it's a downclocked version.



That is actually now true, the RSX is actually a better gpu than the xenos its just way harder to develop for because it doesnt use unified shaders. If devs spent alot of time with the RSX they could get it to pull out better graphics than the xenos.

The RSX is definitely not as efficient or advanced as the Xenos. The Xenos is definitely the better GPU, in a lot of ways...
Avatar image for -GeordiLaForge-
-GeordiLaForge-

7167

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#12 -GeordiLaForge-
Member since 2006 • 7167 Posts

so wich system is more powerfull because I heard that Xbox360 is more powerfull.

ChromeHydrolics
The 360 has the better gpu and architecture, and the PS3 has the better CPU. They're actually going to be pretty equal in the graphics dept. when all is said and done. It's just going to take a long time for the PS3 to catch up.
Avatar image for ChocolatePimp
ChocolatePimp

476

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#13 ChocolatePimp
Member since 2005 • 476 Posts

Sony could make a console stronger and better than Xbox360 but it didnt WHY??????

ChromeHydrolics

I guess because, they (SONY)wanted to make  it more like a DVD player, that happens to play games , ..you know a,blu-ray player.....i guess , because thats what they are use to .....(DVD PLAYERS).........

Avatar image for Sgt_Hale
Sgt_Hale

2257

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#14 Sgt_Hale
Member since 2007 • 2257 Posts
[QUOTE="MGS9150"][QUOTE="Xeonz"][QUOTE="ChromeHydrolics"]

Sony could make a console stronger and better than Xbox360 but it didnt WHY??????

-GeordiLaForge-

They spent too much time on Blu-Gay and The Celery processor, they were gonna develop the GPU like they did for PS2 but that was scratched off the list and they turned to nVIDIA the last moment and it costed them and came up with a mediocre GPU that doesn't even touch a 7800GTX in reality, since it's a downclocked version.



That is actually now true, the RSX is actually a better gpu than the xenos its just way harder to develop for because it doesnt use unified shaders. If devs spent alot of time with the RSX they could get it to pull out better graphics than the xenos.

The RSX is definitely not as efficient or advanced as the Xenos. The Xenos is definitely the better GPU, in a lot of ways...

Actually, the RSX is more powerful, the Xenos just has unified shaders. That's really the difference b/w the two consoles this gen... the PS3 is more powerful but the 360 is easier to program for.

Avatar image for MGS9150
MGS9150

2491

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#15 MGS9150
Member since 2004 • 2491 Posts
[QUOTE="MGS9150"][QUOTE="Xeonz"][QUOTE="ChromeHydrolics"]

Sony could make a console stronger and better than Xbox360 but it didnt WHY??????

-GeordiLaForge-
They spent too much time on Blu-Gay and The Celery processor, they were gonna develop the GPU like they did for PS2 but that was scratched off the list and they turned to nVIDIA the last moment and it costed them and came up with a mediocre GPU that doesn't even touch a 7800GTX in reality, since it's a downclocked version.



That is actually now true, the RSX is actually a better gpu than the xenos its just way harder to develop for because it doesnt use unified shaders. If devs spent alot of time with the RSX they could get it to pull out better graphics than the xenos.

The RSX is definitely not as efficient or advanced as the Xenos. The Xenos is definitely the better GPU, in a lot of ways...



I'm sorry but I dont find your posts credible anymore you have been proven a lemming and a huge fanboy.
Avatar image for Sgt_Hale
Sgt_Hale

2257

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#16 Sgt_Hale
Member since 2007 • 2257 Posts
[QUOTE="ChromeHydrolics"]

so wich system is more powerfull because I heard that Xbox360 is more powerfull.

-GeordiLaForge-

The 360 has the better gpu and architecture, and the PS3 has the better CPU. They're actually going to be pretty equal in the graphics dept. when all is said and done. It's just going to take a long time for the PS3 to catch up.

lol, the PS3 has already caught up. The only 360 game out now that is better than most out on the PS3 is GeOW.

Avatar image for Xeonz
Xeonz

1083

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#17 Xeonz
Member since 2006 • 1083 Posts
[QUOTE="-GeordiLaForge-"][QUOTE="MGS9150"][QUOTE="Xeonz"][QUOTE="ChromeHydrolics"]

Sony could make a console stronger and better than Xbox360 but it didnt WHY??????

Sgt_Hale

They spent too much time on Blu-Gay and The Celery processor, they were gonna develop the GPU like they did for PS2 but that was scratched off the list and they turned to nVIDIA the last moment and it costed them and came up with a mediocre GPU that doesn't even touch a 7800GTX in reality, since it's a downclocked version.



That is actually now true, the RSX is actually a better gpu than the xenos its just way harder to develop for because it doesnt use unified shaders. If devs spent alot of time with the RSX they could get it to pull out better graphics than the xenos.

The RSX is definitely not as efficient or advanced as the Xenos. The Xenos is definitely the better GPU, in a lot of ways...

Actually, the RSX is more powerful, the Xenos just has unified shaders. That's really the difference b/w the two consoles this gen... the PS3 is more powerful but the 360 is easier to program for.

It's not more powerful just because of it's unified shaders, the 48 pipelines, the embedded DRAM, and other little DX10 elements it supports.
Avatar image for afroTunder
afroTunder

91

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#18 afroTunder
Member since 2007 • 91 Posts
its is indeed a technology beast in all means, but the price might be a negative factor against it
Avatar image for -GeordiLaForge-
-GeordiLaForge-

7167

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#19 -GeordiLaForge-
Member since 2006 • 7167 Posts
[QUOTE="-GeordiLaForge-"][QUOTE="MGS9150"][QUOTE="Xeonz"][QUOTE="ChromeHydrolics"]

Sony could make a console stronger and better than Xbox360 but it didnt WHY??????

MGS9150
They spent too much time on Blu-Gay and The Celery processor, they were gonna develop the GPU like they did for PS2 but that was scratched off the list and they turned to nVIDIA the last moment and it costed them and came up with a mediocre GPU that doesn't even touch a 7800GTX in reality, since it's a downclocked version.



That is actually now true, the RSX is actually a better gpu than the xenos its just way harder to develop for because it doesnt use unified shaders. If devs spent alot of time with the RSX they could get it to pull out better graphics than the xenos.

The RSX is definitely not as efficient or advanced as the Xenos. The Xenos is definitely the better GPU, in a lot of ways...



I'm sorry but I dont find your posts credible anymore you have been proven a lemming and a huge fanboy.

Show me once where I have been proven wrong, Mr. MGS9150. You have some nerve calling me the fanboy with a name like MGS...
Avatar image for Xeonz
Xeonz

1083

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#20 Xeonz
Member since 2006 • 1083 Posts
[QUOTE="-GeordiLaForge-"][QUOTE="MGS9150"][QUOTE="Xeonz"][QUOTE="ChromeHydrolics"]

Sony could make a console stronger and better than Xbox360 but it didnt WHY??????

MGS9150
They spent too much time on Blu-Gay and The Celery processor, they were gonna develop the GPU like they did for PS2 but that was scratched off the list and they turned to nVIDIA the last moment and it costed them and came up with a mediocre GPU that doesn't even touch a 7800GTX in reality, since it's a downclocked version.



That is actually now true, the RSX is actually a better gpu than the xenos its just way harder to develop for because it doesnt use unified shaders. If devs spent alot of time with the RSX they could get it to pull out better graphics than the xenos.

The RSX is definitely not as efficient or advanced as the Xenos. The Xenos is definitely the better GPU, in a lot of ways...



I'm sorry but I dont find your posts credible anymore you have been proven a lemming and a huge fanboy.

I know the truth hurts after getting a more inferior system with a inferior GPU that has been outdated BEFORE the system even came out. Quite sad, really how Xenos had technology that wasn't available to PC's for almost a year like it's limited DX10 features which are now available with the G80's.
Avatar image for Nugtoka
Nugtoka

1812

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#21 Nugtoka
Member since 2003 • 1812 Posts

Sony could make a console stronger and better than Xbox360 but it didnt WHY??????

ChromeHydrolics
When are you cows going to learn this gen isn't about GAMES for Sony its about BlueRay movies thats what they want to sell
Avatar image for -GeordiLaForge-
-GeordiLaForge-

7167

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#22 -GeordiLaForge-
Member since 2006 • 7167 Posts
[QUOTE="-GeordiLaForge-"][QUOTE="MGS9150"][QUOTE="Xeonz"][QUOTE="ChromeHydrolics"]

Sony could make a console stronger and better than Xbox360 but it didnt WHY??????

Sgt_Hale

They spent too much time on Blu-Gay and The Celery processor, they were gonna develop the GPU like they did for PS2 but that was scratched off the list and they turned to nVIDIA the last moment and it costed them and came up with a mediocre GPU that doesn't even touch a 7800GTX in reality, since it's a downclocked version.



That is actually now true, the RSX is actually a better gpu than the xenos its just way harder to develop for because it doesnt use unified shaders. If devs spent alot of time with the RSX they could get it to pull out better graphics than the xenos.

The RSX is definitely not as efficient or advanced as the Xenos. The Xenos is definitely the better GPU, in a lot of ways...

Actually, the RSX is more powerful, the Xenos just has unified shaders. That's really the difference b/w the two consoles this gen... the PS3 is more powerful but the 360 is easier to program for.

I never said that it didn't have more peak shader power, because it does. But it's inefficiency will make this a moot point. I said that the Xenos is more advanced and efficient, which it is. The RSX will never be maxed out because so many cycles get wasted through unused pipelines. And the floating point processors in the EDRAM in the Xenos can perform MSAA and HDR. The RSX will take a hit performing either. And it's hardware limits it from performing AA and HDR at the same, atleast for quite a while. Developers developed a new integer based HDR that the RSX can do at the same time as FSAA, but it uses the shader pipelines, which decreases it's shader power even further. The RSX is stripped down technology from 2005. The Xenos includes technology that wasn't seen anywhere else until the release of the 8800gtx. And some of the tech has yet to be seen in other products...