I see a lot of pink and not much else.
This topic is locked from further discussion.
[QUOTE="Anastasia1997"][QUOTE="GeneralShowzer"] Looks seriously mediocre.GeneralShowzerwow....Gameplay was mindblowing, let alone its amazing graphical fidelity I'm not seeing what you're seeing. All i see is an uninteresting linear console shooter i have no interest whatsoever in playing. With a tacked on MP that will try to mimic COD and fail. The industry is getting too predictable. :?. Ya, keep telling yourself that :roll:. It doesnt resemble COD in any way...BTW, how is it tacked on? Its an amzing MP component that rivals the best easily
I'm not seeing what you're seeing. All i see is an uninteresting linear console shooter i have no interest whatsoever in playing. With a tacked on MP that will try to mimic COD and fail. The industry is getting too predictable. :?. Ya, keep telling yourself that :roll:. It doesnt resemble COD in any way...BTW, how is it tacked on? Its an amzing MP component that rivals the best easily The MP looks a lot like COD. KZ2 MP wasn't enough to keep people around, so they copy COD because it's popular. Killstreaks, fast paced gameplay, relying on camping and lone wolf gameplay instead of teamwork, it's all there.[QUOTE="GeneralShowzer"][QUOTE="Anastasia1997"] wow....Gameplay was mindblowing, let alone its amazing graphical fidelityAnastasia1997
[QUOTE="Anastasia1997"]:?. Ya, keep telling yourself that :roll:. It doesnt resemble COD in any way...BTW, how is it tacked on? Its an amzing MP component that rivals the best easily The MP looks a lot like COD. KZ2 MP wasn't enough to keep people around, so they copy COD because it's popular. Killstreaks, fast paced gameplay, relying on camping and lone wolf gameplay instead of teamwork, it's all there. uhh, there are squad mechanics such as dedicated squad channels and party systems, squad spawning systems, etc if you want to play as a squad. It doesnt have killstreaks in how the COD system is set up, just point bonuses....where the hell do you even find camping in KZ3 vids :?. Seriously, no one is asking for Pc elitism in a KZ thread, we arent challenging your precious Crysis technically :roll:[QUOTE="GeneralShowzer"] I'm not seeing what you're seeing. All i see is an uninteresting linear console shooter i have no interest whatsoever in playing. With a tacked on MP that will try to mimic COD and fail. The industry is getting too predictable.GeneralShowzer
[QUOTE="GeneralShowzer"][QUOTE="Anastasia1997"] :?. Ya, keep telling yourself that :roll:. It doesnt resemble COD in any way...BTW, how is it tacked on? Its an amzing MP component that rivals the best easilyThe MP looks a lot like COD. KZ2 MP wasn't enough to keep people around, so they copy COD because it's popular. Killstreaks, fast paced gameplay, relying on camping and lone wolf gameplay instead of teamwork, it's all there. uhh, there are squad mechanics such as dedicated squad channels and party systems, squad spawning systems, etc if you want to play as a squad. It doesnt have killstreaks in how the COD system is set up, just point bonuses....here the hell do you even find camping in KZ3 vids :?. Seriously, no one is asking for Pc elitism in a KZ thread, we arent challenging your precios Crysis technically :roll:Anastasia1997
It has nothing to do with PC vs Console,
instead you're here showing off some offscreen video in poor quality and saying stuff like "new Graphics and Effects king???" or "it will outscore Halo Reach"
And I'm telling you i see just another uninspired boring linear shooter.
Its amazing the conclusions people can draw from Pink, offscreen, poor quality videos/gifs.ferret-gamer
Peoploe are impressed becasue the gripe with the first one was that it was so linear and and had tight enviroments. The video is more impressive than KZ2 with an enemy that big on screen and all those effects. It might not be the best quality but it still is very impressive.
Its amazing what GG can do with the PS3, as weak and dated as the hardware is. I wish they made PC games.
:lol:. Such a fail...KZ3 uses MLAA, which gives the equivalant performance of 16xMSAA with few artifacts...:?[QUOTE="Anastasia1997"][QUOTE="adamosmaki"]Dejavu Oh look its Uncharted 2 vs Crysis Killzone 2 vs Crysis God of War 3 vs Crysis Gt5 vs Crysis all over again arent people bored arguing about graphics and trying to convince their selfs that a console designed in 2004/2005 can make oh so magically games look as good as some games running on hardware multiple times better? For once most likely KZ3 will run in 720p at 30fps and no AA. Also offscreen gifs from a cam and all of a sudden KZ3 is GFX king? Really?HavocV3
wrong. performance-wise MLAA is the equivalent to not having any AA solution at all.
as for how well it translates to MSAA, it's between 4-8x MSAA, not 16x MSAA. and comes with an undesirable shimmering effect.
Actually MLAA is more in between 2xMSAA and 4xMSAA and it blurs things along with the bad shimmering.
You should add "Haters gonna hate " With big red blimping letters on that gif :DThe Witcher 2 spits all over Killzone 3 and that is a large open world RPG.
.
.
Hakkai007
[QUOTE="HavocV3"]
:lol:. Such a fail...KZ3 uses MLAA, which gives the equivalant performance of 16xMSAA with few artifacts...:?Anastasia1997
wrong. performance-wise MLAA is the equivalent to not having any AA solution at all.
as for how well it translates to MSAA, it's between 4-8x MSAA, not 16x MSAA. and comes with an undesirable shimmering effect.
Actually MLAA is more in between 2xMSAA and 4xMSAA and it blurs things along with the bad shimmering.
lol, no, since games like LBP2, KZ3, and GOw3 have no jaggies whatsoever, especially when Santa Monica stated that their MLAA method gives 16xMSAA effiencyThis is the reason GT5 flopped don't overhype games.johny300I think GT5 flopped because of the devs not because of our hyping :P I think it was reasonable to expect an AAA game, but the Devs tried to add too much and just didnt have the resources and time to pull it off. I think its fair to Hype KZ3 as an AAA game though. It seems to me that here on GS, if you have one game that earns AAA status and its an FPS, you can just copy paste the game and add maybe one new weapon and get AAA again. So if that's the case, KZ3 should be fine :P Not dissing KZ3 or anything, im a huge fan. Just saying, its more of the same, which isnt necessarily a bad thing :D
lol, no, since games like LBP2, KZ3, and GOw3 have no jaggies whatsoever, especially when Santa Monica stated that their MLAA method gives 16xMSAA effiencyAnastasia1997
Well Santa Monica is talking BS.
I have compared MLAA back to back on a pair of the same exact monitors and it is inbetween 2xMSAA and 4xMSAA with the added blur and shimmering problems.
MLAA is a post processing effect and is much more inferior to true AA.
You should add "Haters gonna hate " With big red blimping letters on that gif :D[QUOTE="Hakkai007"]
The Witcher 2 spits all over Killzone 3 and that is a large open world RPG.
.
.
GeneralShowzer
KZ3 must look pretty good if you are comparing it to The Witcher 2.
You should add "Haters gonna hate " With big red blimping letters on that gif :D[QUOTE="GeneralShowzer"]
[QUOTE="Hakkai007"]
The Witcher 2 spits all over Killzone 3 and that is a large open world RPG.
.
.
15strong
KZ3 must look pretty good if you are comparing it to The Witcher 2.
Someone compared the wii version of black ops to the pc version the other day on here, it must look pretty good then right?[QUOTE="Hakkai007"][QUOTE="HavocV3"]
wrong. performance-wise MLAA is the equivalent to not having any AA solution at all.
as for how well it translates to MSAA, it's between 4-8x MSAA, not 16x MSAA. and comes with an undesirable shimmering effect.
Anastasia1997
Actually MLAA is more in between 2xMSAA and 4xMSAA and it blurs things along with the bad shimmering.
lol, no, since games like LBP2, KZ3, and GOw3 have no jaggies whatsoever, especially when Santa Monica stated that their MLAA method gives 16xMSAA effiencyIt did give or CAN give? Other wise link please.[QUOTE="15strong"]
KZ3 must look pretty good if you are comparing it to The Witcher 2.
Nah The Witcher 2 is next gen material while Killzone 3 is not even close to the best looking of this gen.
I compared it since the TC said Killzone 3 is graphics king
next gen material....not sure if serious :?[QUOTE="15strong"]
KZ3 must look pretty good if you are comparing it to The Witcher 2.
Nah The Witcher 2 is next gen material while Killzone 3 is not even close to the best looking of this gen.
I compared it since the TC said Killzone 3 is graphics king
next gen material....not sure if serious :? Maybe you should look at the screens again. Then again, you are hyping KZ3 :P[QUOTE="Hakkai007"][QUOTE="15strong"]
KZ3 must look pretty good if you are comparing it to The Witcher 2.
Anastasia1997
Nah The Witcher 2 is next gen material while Killzone 3 is not even close to the best looking of this gen.
I compared it since the TC said Killzone 3 is graphics king
next gen material....not sure if serious :? easily higher than anything this generation of consoles could hope to do. What else would you call the quality then?Please Log In to post.
Log in to comment