Lol GR:AW only 16 players coop online? xbox live is weak

This topic is locked from further discussion.

Avatar image for PS3nextgenonly0
PS3nextgenonly0

261

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#1 PS3nextgenonly0
Member since 2005 • 261 Posts
Seriously PC can handle 64 players with games. 16 players coop is very weak and not enough players

http://www.gametrailers.com/player.php?id=9032&pl=game&type=wmv

Avatar image for teuf_
Teuf_

30805

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#2 Teuf_
Member since 2004 • 30805 Posts
Well, at least its better than the 8-player limit in COD2.
Avatar image for -=XBoXDemon=-
-=XBoXDemon=-

3296

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#3 -=XBoXDemon=-
Member since 2003 • 3296 Posts
For this type of game there shouldnt be more than 16 players. These are SWAT team type missions why would there be a 64 person SWAT team/ Rangers whatever.
Avatar image for Kruza
Kruza

7523

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#4 Kruza
Member since 2003 • 7523 Posts
16 is fine for GRAW. lol
Avatar image for Xrules06
Xrules06

16294

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#5 Xrules06
Member since 2005 • 16294 Posts

Seriously PC can handle 64 players with games. 16 players coop is very weak and not enough players

http://www.gametrailers.com/player.php?id=9032&pl=game&type=wmv

PS3nextgenonly0

Wasn't BF 2 suppose to have 128 players I guess the PC couldn't handle it. :lol:

Avatar image for dracula_16
dracula_16

16020

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 26

User Lists: 0

#6 dracula_16
Member since 2005 • 16020 Posts
At least Xbox360 has good FPS's unlike a little something called Flopstation 3 :lol:
Avatar image for 208603993464172577768899665104
208603993464172577768899665104

1597

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 8

User Lists: 0

#7 208603993464172577768899665104
Member since 2005 • 1597 Posts

[QUOTE="PS3nextgenonly0"]Seriously PC can handle 64 players with games. 16 players coop is very weak and not enough players

http://www.gametrailers.com/player.php?id=9032&pl=game&type=wmv

Xrules06

Wasn't BF 2 suppose to have 128 players I guess the PC couldn't handle it. :lol:

And how much can BF2:MC handle. :lol:
Avatar image for AdrianWerner
AdrianWerner

28441

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 4

User Lists: 0

#8 AdrianWerner
Member since 2003 • 28441 Posts
It's more than enough for co-op. now..if it's also for other game modes..then it is weak. And really..for any GR fan GRAW PC>>>>>>>>> GRAW 360
Avatar image for katalist
katalist

10159

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 7

User Lists: 0

#9 katalist
Member since 2003 • 10159 Posts
PDZ has 32 players online, u  lose
Avatar image for stuart69
stuart69

3163

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#10 stuart69
Member since 2004 • 3163 Posts
You fail.16 players is perfect.Go away.
Avatar image for Big_T-Mac
Big_T-Mac

6973

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#11 Big_T-Mac
Member since 2005 • 6973 Posts

they must not be that advanced if it takes 32 of them to do the job of 8.

again, i will say 10 on 10 is perfect.

Avatar image for trifecta_basic
trifecta_basic

11542

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 17

User Lists: 0

#12 trifecta_basic
Member since 2003 • 11542 Posts
16 is good for co-op.  If it's 16 VERSUS, that's GARBAGE.  Socom 3 on PSTWO has 32 players even with vehicles.
Avatar image for -=XBoXDemon=-
-=XBoXDemon=-

3296

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#13 -=XBoXDemon=-
Member since 2003 • 3296 Posts
16 is good for co-op.  If it's 16 VERSUS, that's GARBAGE.  Socom 3 on PSTWO has 32 players even with vehicles. trifecta_basic


Maybe the levels are set up better for 16 players? Its not that the XBOX 360 cant handle more since other games have more.

and 16 coop??? Thats overkill..
Avatar image for trifecta_basic
trifecta_basic

11542

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 17

User Lists: 0

#14 trifecta_basic
Member since 2003 • 11542 Posts
[QUOTE="trifecta_basic"]16 is good for co-op. If it's 16 VERSUS, that's GARBAGE. Socom 3 on PSTWO has 32 players even with vehicles. -=XBoXDemon=-


Maybe the levels are set up better for 16 players? Its not that the XBOX 360 cant handle more since other games have more.

and 16 coop??? Thats overkill..



considering how big the ghost recon 2 maps were, I doubt that's the case.
Avatar image for 343Guilty-spark
343Guilty-spark

2291

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#15 343Guilty-spark
Member since 2005 • 2291 Posts
Seriously PC can handle 64 players with games. 16 players coop is very weak and not enough players

http://www.gametrailers.com/player.php?id=9032&pl=game&type=wmv

PS3nextgenonly0
lol @ the cow who has no idea  how online  multiplayer works!!!! LOL
Avatar image for Solid_Snake0000
Solid_Snake0000

3022

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#16 Solid_Snake0000
Member since 2004 • 3022 Posts

xbox - set the bar low.

"but.....but teh 16 players is fine :cry: - yeah it is, for a last gen game.

Avatar image for 343Guilty-spark
343Guilty-spark

2291

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#17 343Guilty-spark
Member since 2005 • 2291 Posts

xbox - set the bar low.

"but.....but teh 16 players is fine :cry: - yeah it is, for a last gen game.

Solid_Snake0000
you DO understand that a person witha standerd bb connection CANT host 64 people right???? those 64 player matches you see on the pc are DEDICATED SERVERS   
Avatar image for Jonsghost
Jonsghost

1029

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#18 Jonsghost
Member since 2003 • 1029 Posts
"16 players, its good enough" -lemmings

Avatar image for SgtWhiskeyjack
SgtWhiskeyjack

16364

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 6

User Lists: 0

#19 SgtWhiskeyjack
Member since 2004 • 16364 Posts
"We are going to drop you guys covertly behind enemy line, there are 64 of you so we'll need 11 helicopters, any questions?"
Avatar image for puertorock_papi
puertorock_papi

2021

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#20 puertorock_papi
Member since 2005 • 2021 Posts
If your going to play co-op missions online then 16 total is fine. But if it's team vs team deathmatch then 8 vs 8 is freaking weak for next gen. Shyt I could play 16 vs 16 now with my PS2.
Avatar image for Gekko101
Gekko101

2930

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#21 Gekko101
Member since 2005 • 2930 Posts

16 players is not bad...

I remeber trying to play CS:Source with 52 players.....much better with like 16-32....

And in pc BF2 there is a mod that can add up to 400 player...but

Avatar image for SgtWhiskeyjack
SgtWhiskeyjack

16364

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 6

User Lists: 0

#22 SgtWhiskeyjack
Member since 2004 • 16364 Posts
8 Vs 8 is still great, escpecially with no draw distance issues where line of sight plays a big part. Also there a normally hot spots on any map, no matter what the size, that soon actually reduce its size once you've leant it.
Avatar image for -Ten-
-Ten-

7493

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#23 -Ten-
Member since 2003 • 7493 Posts
I think 16 is enough 8 on 8 is fine with me
Avatar image for ethanraiden
ethanraiden

1579

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#24 ethanraiden
Member since 2004 • 1579 Posts
It's Ghost Recon don't forget, it's a tactical shooter, it's not like PDZ which has 32, if there were too many people on the map it would just turn into a run and gun game.
Avatar image for Magna01
Magna01

4476

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#25 Magna01
Member since 2004 • 4476 Posts

[QUOTE="katalist"]PDZ has 32 players online, u lose



i've seen 40 on some of the servers and even more. how do u guys do that?
Avatar image for Sicknic
Sicknic

4241

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#26 Sicknic
Member since 2004 • 4241 Posts

Since Black Hawk down for Xbox1 could do 50 players over live, I have every bit of faith the same resaults can be achieved for games on the 360, so long as the developer takes the time to get that number.

Lazy Developers do not prove that the a console is weak...

Avatar image for meggido
meggido

16980

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#27 meggido
Member since 2005 • 16980 Posts

[QUOTE="PS3nextgenonly0"]Seriously PC can handle 64 players with games. 16 players coop is very weak and not enough players

http://www.gametrailers.com/player.php?id=9032&pl=game&type=wmv

Xrules06

Wasn't BF 2 suppose to have 128 players I guess the PC couldn't handle it. :lol:

Well 64 is much better then 16

Avatar image for gomer69
gomer69

1254

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#28 gomer69
Member since 2003 • 1254 Posts
hot
Avatar image for project343
project343

14106

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#29 project343
Member since 2005 • 14106 Posts
16 player CO-OP.

Does the PS3 have anything more impressive? Typically you only see 2-player co-op, so 16 is quite wonderful.
Avatar image for taker42
taker42

1614

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#30 taker42
Member since 2007 • 1614 Posts
16 player CO-OP.

Does the PS3 have anything more impressive? Typically you only see 2-player co-op, so 16 is quite wonderful.project343
Check the date. The idiot above you keep bumping old threads. Let this one die.
Avatar image for OldParr
OldParr

2996

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#31 OldParr
Member since 2006 • 2996 Posts
then how do u explain PERFECT DARK ZERO!!!!! pawnd!!!!!!/thread
Avatar image for coreygames
coreygames

5027

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#32 coreygames
Member since 2005 • 5027 Posts
Some games would suck with a rediculously high number of people playing at once, like Splinter Cell. If that is their decision, so be it.
Avatar image for project343
project343

14106

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#33 project343
Member since 2005 • 14106 Posts
[QUOTE="taker42"] Check the date. The idiot above you keep bumping old threads. Let this one die.

What does the date have to do with anything? :?
Avatar image for DA_B0MB
DA_B0MB

9938

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#34 DA_B0MB
Member since 2005 • 9938 Posts
[QUOTE="PS3nextgenonly0"]Seriously PC can handle 64 players with games. 16 players coop is very weak and not enough players

http://www.gametrailers.com/player.php?id=9032&pl=game&type=wmv

You realize you said co-op right? I think you ment multiplayer. PS: Your sig makes you look like your religion is sonyism. :lol:
Avatar image for ChiChiMonKilla
ChiChiMonKilla

2339

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#35 ChiChiMonKilla
Member since 2007 • 2339 Posts
The xbox had 16 player standard and the 360 is alot stronger so shouldn't 24 or 32 be standard now ??
Avatar image for taker42
taker42

1614

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#36 taker42
Member since 2007 • 1614 Posts
[QUOTE="project343"][QUOTE="taker42"] Check the date. The idiot above you keep bumping old threads. Let this one die.

What does the date have to do with anything? :?

TC made this thread on Jan 23 2006. That's more than a year ago.