i bought the game on the first day. i thought it was going to be the best game ever. but its just the like first with great graphics. you think this game deserves a 9.0? higher or lower?
This topic is locked from further discussion.
i bought the game on the first day. i thought it was going to be the best game ever. but its just the like first with great graphics. you think this game deserves a 9.0? higher or lower?
I think it deserves the 9.0 it got. It's a very fun and enjoyable shooter that gets too much praise from cows and too much crap from lemmings.
There are more fps that are over-rated bioshock(system shock 2 is better).alskdjfhg1
Oh God. Not these kind of people again. Just judge Bioshock by what it is, not what it is compared to a game made by that developer.
[QUOTE="oblivionboar"]
the online is boring compared to modern warfare but the graphics are on par with crysis
Racer850
I guess you've never played crysis?
i guess you haven't played crysis, it can be done on the ps3 that's why the second 1 is coming to the ps3/360 with improved graphics then the 1st. uncharted 2 story owns crysis. its a 2007 game...Almost every fps i know is over-rated, so yes. There are more fps that are over-rated bioshock(system shock 2 is better), halo, metroid prime,gears of war,resistance,crysis, etc, in fact shooters are the most overrated genre if you ask me.alskdjfhg1
[QUOTE="alskdjfhg1"]Almost every fps i know is over-rated, so yes. There are more fps that are over-rated bioshock(system shock 2 is better), halo, metroid prime,gears of war,resistance,crysis, etc, in fact shooters are the most overrated genre if you ask me.jg4xchamp
[QUOTE="jg4xchamp"][QUOTE="alskdjfhg1"]Almost every fps i know is over-rated, so yes. There are more fps that are over-rated bioshock(system shock 2 is better), halo, metroid prime,gears of war,resistance,crysis, etc, in fact shooters are the most overrated genre if you ask me.fenwickhotmail
How can you people say this? What's so overrated about them?
[QUOTE="jg4xchamp"][QUOTE="alskdjfhg1"]Almost every fps i know is over-rated, so yes. There are more fps that are over-rated bioshock(system shock 2 is better), halo, metroid prime,gears of war,resistance,crysis, etc, in fact shooters are the most overrated genre if you ask me.fenwickhotmail
Metroid is overated imo as well. because? Some elaboration on it's "overrated" status would be very nice :)[QUOTE="fenwickhotmail"][QUOTE="jg4xchamp"]
1- You not liking the genre, doesn't mean the genre is or the games are overrated. I don't like racing sims very much that doesn't mean I can purly justify saying Gran Turismo or Forza are overrated
2- Metroid Prime? seriously Metroid Prime. That's just hatin.jg4xchamp
Didnt it get a 9.6 or something? I just didnt like it, not much story, too much back-tracking, a few annoying gameplay designs, eg. getting blasted off tall structures, shooting doors constantly. Can't put my finger on it particularly, just didnt find it very enjoyable.
its over rated but not as much as halo and MW 1&2
halo 3 is the king of overrated games Agreed. average gameplay, below average story, bad characters and good music yet people praise the hell out of it.because? Some elaboration on it's "overrated" status would be very nice :)[QUOTE="jg4xchamp"]
[QUOTE="fenwickhotmail"] Metroid is overated imo as well.fenwickhotmail
Didnt it get a 9.6 or something? I just didnt like it, not much story, too much back-tracking, a few annoying gameplay designs, eg. getting blasted off tall structures, shooting doors constantly. Can't put my finger on it particularly, just didnt find it very enjoyable.
Story was presented if you went for it. It wasn't a cutscene fest like most games. IT never sacrificed it's immersion for story, it was all about finding lore and reading up on the all the story of what went on and what was going on. Metroid...there's always back tracking :P..but fair complaint. Um...the blasting doors was just too open them...come on now. As for getting blasted off tall structures...*shrugs*..stop getting shot :P But ok....I can see the back tracking getting annoying....and just not getting into it. I personally LOVE the game..so i might have a bias.I think it deserves the 9.0 it got. It's a very fun and enjoyable shooter that gets too much praise from cows and too much crap from lemmings.
Phoenix534
Same here. The game deserves the 9 it got. Gameplay is solid, graphics are really good for the time (which seems like a long time, but its only a couple of months) and the online has THE best clan support of any console game I know (and for shooters, I have most of them, at least high profile ones).
So yes, KZ 2 has the content of a 9 game. Yet it does not deserve to be on a GOTY list this year. It has a great value, but some aspects are thin.
In conclusion, the 9 it received is more than deserved. Its the perfect score for this game. More would be Overrating it, and less would be underrating it.
Only Lems and Cows make a fuss about this game. Its a great tactical FPS. The cover system works great and the shooting is also great. No reason to be considered Overrated for getting a 9.
[QUOTE="oblivionboar"][QUOTE="toast_burner"]halo 3 is the king of overrated games Agreed. average gameplay, below average story, bad characters and good music yet people praise the hell out of it. disagree entirely below average? the story is solid, it's presented horribly and the writing needs work(come on now bungie) but the lore is fantastic, and a lot of the story has many good points to it. Characters. Johnson is fine, chief is pretty good...and Cortana is a well developed and great character.its over rated but not as much as halo and MW 1&2
toast_burner
[QUOTE="jg4xchamp"] because? Some elaboration on it's "overrated" status would be very nice :)
Didnt it get a 9.6 or something? I just didnt like it, not much story, too much back-tracking, a few annoying gameplay designs, eg. getting blasted off tall structures, shooting doors constantly. Can't put my finger on it particularly, just didnt find it very enjoyable.
Story was presented if you went for it. It wasn't a cutscene fest like most games. IT never sacrificed it's immersion for story, it was all about finding lore and reading up on the all the story of what went on and what was going on. Metroid...there's always back tracking :P..but fair complaint. Um...the blasting doors was just too open them...come on now. As for getting blasted off tall structures...*shrugs*..stop getting shot :P But ok....I can see the back tracking getting annoying....and just not getting into it. I personally LOVE the game..so i might have a bias. I might go back to it actually, it's general consesus this game is amazing and some of my friends love it as well so I'm guessing it's just me. Next time I get a holiday I'll reboot it :PAll FPS are the same? Where did you hear that?how can you judge a FPS?, they are all the same, at least KZ2 has the best grapghics of them all.
for the record i an not a fan of FPS, but i am intrested in KZ2 and bioshock 2.
2mrw
[QUOTE="jg4xchamp"][QUOTE="fenwickhotmail"]Story was presented if you went for it. It wasn't a cutscene fest like most games. IT never sacrificed it's immersion for story, it was all about finding lore and reading up on the all the story of what went on and what was going on. Metroid...there's always back tracking :P..but fair complaint. Um...the blasting doors was just too open them...come on now. As for getting blasted off tall structures...*shrugs*..stop getting shot :P But ok....I can see the back tracking getting annoying....and just not getting into it. I personally LOVE the game..so i might have a bias. I might go back to it actually, it's general consesus this game is amazing and some of my friends love it as well so I'm guessing it's just me. Next time I get a holiday I'll reboot it :PDidnt it get a 9.6 or something? I just didnt like it, not much story, too much back-tracking, a few annoying gameplay designs, eg. getting blasted off tall structures, shooting doors constantly. Can't put my finger on it particularly, just didnt find it very enjoyable.
fenwickhotmail
i think it deserves what it got...the graphics are great, the campaign was awesome and fun and the mp is good though ruined by rocket launcher noobs
9.0 was spot on. One of the best FPS games of the year. LOVED being able to take cover. Other FPS shooters just don't feel as complete without that feature. It doesn't make sense to me when I can't do it in other games. Bread_or_Decide
hahaha, I know what you mean. That feature alone felt like something that should be an standard. The cover was great since it allowed us to use Lean on consoles, and most FPS that have lean on PC, don't have on consoles, which is crap since the leaning "technik" can help you a lot in FPS.
The weight of the gun felt nice. Too many FPS have you zipping around at the speed of light holding giant weapons. Come on now. Realism has to come into play at some point.overrated, controls feel sluggish and weapons feel underpowered
DoomZaW
This. 9.0 is fine. Overhyped, but not overrated in general. Personally, the SP didnt get enough praise, yes the characters were boring, so what, and yeah the stroyline was generic but the actual content was awesome. Never have a i shot a gun so satisfying as the AA gun halfway through the campaign.I think it deserves the 9.0 it got. It's a very fun and enjoyable shooter that gets too much praise from cows and too much crap from lemmings.
Phoenix534
I didn't like it at all, but it is a far better game than the last one and just as good as any other console shooter out there that scored in that range.
The graphics were really good although they remind me of why I do not like console FPSs all that much. I really cannot get used to the small FOV in the game. It completely ruins the experience for me. In other games, I can deal with it somewhat, but that and the controls completely turned me off.
how can you judge a FPS?, they are all the same, at least KZ2 has the best grapghics of them all.
for the record i an not a fan of FPS, but i am intrested in KZ2 and bioshock 2.
All FPS are the same? Where did you hear that? seeing is believing, so the only thing that appears on the screen is a gun ( avaliable in many sizes and fires all kinds of things, bullets, beams, fire.....etc), then something appears on the screen and it's moving, the next thing is pressing the trigger till it stops moving, and to provide some varaity you can throw a granade..................the end Bioshock is the rare example that's different fro all other shooters, KZ2, Halo, COD, BF..etc, they are all the same wz different enviromnets, this is not bad but to say that one is better than the other one ( they are the same thing basically) is just unlogical.People who get turned off by controls are either stubborn and fussy or have no learning capacity whatsoever. I reckon if KZ2 didn't have the controls it has, i wud have traded it for MW2. As a result, i stick with my KZ2 and wait for BC2.I didn't like it at all, but it is a far better game than the last one and just as good as any other console shooter out there that scored in that range.
The graphics were really good although they remind me of why I do not like console FPSs all that much. I really cannot get used to the small FOV in the game. It completely ruins the experience for me. In other games, I can deal with it somewhat, but that and the controls completely turned me off.
heretrix
Its presentational quality is undeniable, but I didn't find myself particularly engaged by neither the gameplay or the narrative. Even though the AI is pretty capable and the deliberate feel of movement brings a sense of realism. When I hit an obstacle where I needed to put in some effort to push through I just stopped playing. I don't know if it's shooter fatigue or what, but I didn't much care for Killzone 2. I'd give it a 7/10 on the account of it still very obviously being of high quality.
how can you judge a FPS?, they are all the same, at least KZ2 has the best grapghics of them all.
for the record i an not a fan of FPS, but i am intrested in KZ2 and bioshock 2.
All FPS are the same? Where did you hear that? seeing is believing, so the only thing that appears on the screen is a gun ( avaliable in many sizes and fires all kinds of things, bullets, beams, fire.....etc), then something appears on the screen and it's moving, the next thing is pressing the trigger till it stops moving, and to provide some varaity you can throw a granade..................the end Bioshock is the rare example that's different fro all other shooters, KZ2, Halo, COD, BF..etc, they are all the same wz different enviromnets, this is not bad but to say that one is better than the other one ( they are the same thing basically) is just unlogical. Crysis, STALKER, Cryostasis, ARMA II, are all very differen't from what you see in games like Call of Duty. You're over simplifying the game mechanics and design.Please Log In to post.
Log in to comment