It's that time of the month again - FEBRUARY NDP - (spoilers: Nintendo wins)

[QUOTE="coolguy1111"]Yea because PR people never lie, what is this the first time youve ever been alive for a ocnosle launch? Seriously, Sony told so much BS about the ps2, and guess what, it didnt hurt it at all. The ps3 is selling at a perfect rate for a console with no killer app, and wasnt supposed to launch yet. Also, maybe you missed how vocal and outspoken sony was about MS releasing the 360 so early? Lets see how good the ps3 would have been if it launched end of this year, Home, LPW, Oblivion, Motorstorm, Resistance, 3rd party games would be more polished, Warhawk, Liar, and alot of other games, it would have been a great launch.Truth_Hurts_U

All I can do is...

:lol:

360 had no killer app till Gears. All the "cows" made fun of 360 because of it. "Cows" made fun of 360 for not outselling the PS2.

My, oh, my, how the tables have turned.

The Playstation 3 isn't doing that well right now. But it's still going to prevail and maintain a nice chunk of market share when it's all over and done with.


TekkenMaster606

[QUOTE="Buff-McBlumpkin"]

[QUOTE="coolguy1111"]There not excuses, there facts..coolguy1111

Wait, wait..... where are the "Not excuses," where are the "Facts?" FOR THE LOVE OF GOD WHERE ARE YOU POINTING?!?

They're.

[QUOTE="TekkenMaster606"]Let's all act like those people buying the Playstation 2 right now are not future Playstation 3 buyers. :roll:BuryMe

Well according to Lemmings (such as yourself) it has no games and its getting closer to 5 million all the time...so yeah. Runningflame570

I never once said PS3 didn't have games. It does. Just crappy ones.

Cow logic...

"Resistance is under rated..." "Gamespot sucks at reviewing"

Even your beloved "underrated" Resistance isn't helping PS3. And if Gamespot underrated it. Why isn't it selling like hot cakes?

[QUOTE="JimJackJose"]lol... so many excuses as to why ps3 was last.... coolguy1111

Let's all act like those people buying the Playstation 2 right now are not future Playstation 3 buyers. :roll:


TekkenMaster606

Maybe they are. But seeing as the PS2 was never over 400 dollars and began retailing at 300, and is now selling at 129.99 dollars, it's going to be at least 3 years before many of those people buy a PS3. Sig me on it.

Firstly, ignore the fanboys, right now, you have no argument, but what blind fnaboys are saying. The 360 had games, it had launch games, and it certainly had enough games and an online setup worth 400$. PS3 doesnt, so why would it sell? Face it, its obvious to everyone but fanboys such as yourself, the ps3 was forced to launch earlier.coolguy1111

Actually it launched later. Forgetting Spring 2006 again?

:lol:

[QUOTE="TekkenMaster606"]Let's all act like those people buying the Playstation 2 right now are not future Playstation 3 buyers. :roll:


fatzombiepigeon

Maybe they are. But seeing as the PS2 was never over 400 dollars and began retailing at 600, and is now selling at 129.99 dollars, it's going to be at least 3 years before many of those people buy a PS3. Sig me on it.

[QUOTE="TekkenMaster606"]Let's all act like those people buying the Playstation 2 right now are not future Playstation 3 buyers. :roll:


fatzombiepigeon

Maybe they are. But seeing as the PS2 was never over 400 dollars and began retailing at 300, and is now selling at 129.99 dollars, it's going to be at least 3 years before many of those people buy a PS3. Sig me on it.

[QUOTE="fatzombiepigeon"]

[QUOTE="TekkenMaster606"]Let's all act like those people buying the Playstation 2 right now are not future Playstation 3 buyers. :roll:


Nike_Air

Maybe they are. But seeing as the PS2 was never over 400 dollars and began retailing at 300, and is now selling at 129.99 dollars, it's going to be at least 3 years before many of those people buy a PS3. Sig me on it.

I never said it was, did I?

[QUOTE="fatzombiepigeon"]

[QUOTE="TekkenMaster606"]Let's all act like those people buying the Playstation 2 right now are not future Playstation 3 buyers. :roll:


TekkenMaster606

Maybe they are. But seeing as the PS2 was never over 400 dollars and began retailing at 600, and is now selling at 129.99 dollars, it's going to be at least 3 years before many of those people buy a PS3. Sig me on it.

Let's all act like those people buying the Playstation 2 right now are not future Playstation 3 buyers. :roll:


TekkenMaster606

[QUOTE="coolguy1111"]Firstly, ignore the fanboys, right now, you have no argument, but what blind fnaboys are saying. The 360 had games, it had launch games, and it certainly had enough games and an online setup worth 400$. PS3 doesnt, so why would it sell? Face it, its obvious to everyone but fanboys such as yourself, the ps3 was forced to launch earlier.Truth_Hurts_U

Actually it launched later. Forgetting Spring 2006 again?

:lol:

[QUOTE="coolguy1111"]Firstly, ignore the fanboys, right now, you have no argument, but what blind fnaboys are saying. The 360 had games, it had launch games, and it certainly had enough games and an online setup worth 400$. PS3 doesnt, so why would it sell? Face it, its obvious to everyone but fanboys such as yourself, the ps3 was forced to launch earlier.Truth_Hurts_U

Actually it launched later. Forgetting Spring 2006 again?

:lol:

[QUOTE="fatzombiepigeon"]

[QUOTE="TekkenMaster606"]Let's all act like those people buying the Playstation 2 right now are not future Playstation 3 buyers. :roll:


TekkenMaster606

Maybe they are. But seeing as the PS2 was never over 400 dollars and began retailing at 600, and is now selling at 129.99 dollars, it's going to be at least 3 years before many of those people buy a PS3. Sig me on it.

Hey genius - if your theory about 'people buying PS2s are future PS3 owners' is true, why didn't it work that way for Nintendo? Why did the N64 sell less than SNES? Or the GCN sell less than the N64? Isn't it possible that you have no idea what you're talking about??? That maybe (just maybe) people like to think for themselves once in awhile and actually make a purchase based on desire rather than blind loyalty?

Where are you all getting your crystal balls from?jdknight21

[QUOTE="coolguy1111"][QUOTE="JimJackJose"]lol... so many excuses as to why ps3 was last.... JimJackJose

[QUOTE="coolguy1111"][QUOTE="Buff-McBlumpkin"]

[QUOTE="coolguy1111"]There not excuses, there facts..Buff-McBlumpkin

Wait, wait..... where are the "Not excuses," where are the "Facts?" FOR THE LOVE OF GOD WHERE ARE YOU POINTING?!?

They're.

 shhh... that "fact" doesn't work for him!JimJackJose

Yeah. He keeps making the same replies like a robot.

[QUOTE="TekkenMaster606"][QUOTE="fatzombiepigeon"]

[QUOTE="TekkenMaster606"]Let's all act like those people buying the Playstation 2 right now are not future Playstation 3 buyers. :roll:


NotThat_basic

Maybe they are. But seeing as the PS2 was never over 400 dollars and began retailing at 600, and is now selling at 129.99 dollars, it's going to be at least 3 years before many of those people buy a PS3. Sig me on it.

Hey genius - if your theory about 'people buying PS2s are future PS3 owners' is true, why didn't it work that way for Nintendo? Why did the N64 sell less than SNES? Or the GCN sell less than the N64? Isn't it possible that you have no idea what you're talking about??? That maybe (just maybe) people like to think for themselves once in awhile and actually make a purchase based on desire rather than blind loyalty?

[QUOTE="Truth_Hurts_U"]

[QUOTE="coolguy1111"]Firstly, ignore the fanboys, right now, you have no argument, but what blind fnaboys are saying. The 360 had games, it had launch games, and it certainly had enough games and an online setup worth 400$. PS3 doesnt, so why would it sell? Face it, its obvious to everyone but fanboys such as yourself, the ps3 was forced to launch earlier.JimJackJose

Actually it launched later. Forgetting Spring 2006 again?

:lol:

If I recall correctly. A lot of people waited for the Super Nintendo, instead of buying the Sega Genesis.

It was because the NES still had lots of games, even after the SNES was released. So it did work for Nintendo.
TekkenMaster606

But why didn't it continue to work for them, then? Or, do you just want to ignore that fact?

[QUOTE="TekkenMaster606"]

If I recall correctly. A lot of people waited for the Super Nintendo, instead of buying the Sega Genesis.

It was because the NES still had lots of games, even after the SNES was released. So it did work for Nintendo.
NotThat_basic

But why didn't it continue to work for them, then? Or, do you just want to ignore that fact?

If I recall correctly. A lot of people waited for the Super Nintendo, instead of buying the Sega Genesis.

It was because the NES still had lots of games, even after the SNES was released. So it did work for Nintendo.
TekkenMaster606

[QUOTE="NotThat_basic"][QUOTE="TekkenMaster606"]

If I recall correctly. A lot of people waited for the Super Nintendo, instead of buying the Sega Genesis.

It was because the NES still had lots of games, even after the SNES was released. So it did work for Nintendo.
TekkenMaster606

But why didn't it continue to work for them, then? Or, do you just want to ignore that fact?

Nintendo still exsists as a company that develops video game hardware and software.

Everything they have done has worked for them.

LOL!!! That's it, keep avoiding the fact that your 'theory' is significantly flawed...

...this had nothing to do with Nintendo existing or not - this had to do with your statement that 'everyone that buys a PS2 is bound to buy a PS3' - the fact that Nintendo's marketshare consistently declined, flies directly in the face of your opinion and seems to elude you.

[QUOTE="TekkenMaster606"]If I recall correctly. A lot of people waited for the Super Nintendo, instead of buying the Sega Genesis.

It was because the NES still had lots of games, even after the SNES was released. So it did work for Nintendo.
Ontain

This thread has the best damage controll by cows I have ever seen. You know deep down all the cows thought the PS3 was going to outsell the 360 this month. I just wish MS would do a price drop soon so the PS3 never outsells the 360. The evil sony ship is sinking right before our eyes. Only 200K and no shortages on new hardware????? LMFAO

[QUOTE="Ontain"][QUOTE="TekkenMaster606"]If I recall correctly. A lot of people waited for the Super Nintendo, instead of buying the Sega Genesis.

It was because the NES still had lots of games, even after the SNES was released. So it did work for Nintendo.
coolguy1111

[QUOTE="Ontain"][QUOTE="TekkenMaster606"]If I recall correctly. A lot of people waited for the Super Nintendo, instead of buying the Sega Genesis.

It was because the NES still had lots of games, even after the SNES was released. So it did work for Nintendo.
coolguy1111

[QUOTE="TekkenMaster606"][QUOTE="NotThat_basic"][QUOTE="TekkenMaster606"]

If I recall correctly. A lot of people waited for the Super Nintendo, instead of buying the Sega Genesis.

It was because the NES still had lots of games, even after the SNES was released. So it did work for Nintendo.
NotThat_basic

But why didn't it continue to work for them, then? Or, do you just want to ignore that fact?

Nintendo still exsists as a company that develops video game hardware and software.

Everything they have done has worked for them.

LOL!!! That's it, keep avoiding the fact that your 'theory' is significantly flawed...

...this had nothing to do with Nintendo existing or not - this had to do with your statement that 'everyone that buys a PS2 is bound to buy a PS3' - the fact that Nintendo's marketshare consistently declined, flies directly in the face of your opinion and seems to elude you.

[QUOTE="Ontain"][QUOTE="TekkenMaster606"]If I recall correctly. A lot of people waited for the Super Nintendo, instead of buying the Sega Genesis.

It was because the NES still had lots of games, even after the SNES was released. So it did work for Nintendo.
coolguy1111

Who said anything about 'dying'??? Tekken made a very broad statement about 'all PS2 owners buying a PS3' and, if you'd stop and think before you type, you'd realize that although a number of SNES owners may have bought a N64 - obviously not all of them did, otherwise Nintendo's marketshare wouldn't have declined as much as it did...

...same with the N64 to GCN generation.

[QUOTE="coolguy1111"][QUOTE="Ontain"][QUOTE="TekkenMaster606"]If I recall correctly. A lot of people waited for the Super Nintendo, instead of buying the Sega Genesis.

It was because the NES still had lots of games, even after the SNES was released. So it did work for Nintendo.
NotThat_basic

Who said anything about 'dying'??? Tekken made a very broad statement about 'all PS2 owners buying a PS3' and, if you'd stop and think before you type, you'd realize that although a number of SNES owners may have bought a N64 - obviously not all of them did, otherwise Nintendo's marketshare wouldn't have declined as much as it did...

...same with the N64 to GCN generation.

To be fair , historically Nintendo consoles have been the easiest to move away from when gamers get older. (for the most part). It is going to be much more difficult to be a playstation fan and regress back to Nintendo.

Nike_Air

Are you trying to play the 'kiddie' card, now? And what does this statement have to do with the price of tea in China??? Tekken made a blanket statement and suggested that PS2 owners are blind loyalists that will continue to buy Sony products - is that a true statement? Are you agreeing with that?

Suppose I stick to your 'kiddie' theory for a moment - couldn't some of those same PS2 fans who are scared to 'regress' to 'kiddie land', instead opt to purchase a 360?

[QUOTE="NotThat_basic"]

[QUOTE="coolguy1111"][QUOTE="Ontain"][QUOTE="TekkenMaster606"]If I recall correctly. A lot of people waited for the Super Nintendo, instead of buying the Sega Genesis.

It was because the NES still had lots of games, even after the SNES was released. So it did work for Nintendo.
TekkenMaster606

Who said anything about 'dying'??? Tekken made a very broad statement about 'all PS2 owners buying a PS3' and, if you'd stop and think before you type, you'd realize that although a number of SNES owners may have bought a N64 - obviously not all of them did, otherwise Nintendo's marketshare wouldn't have declined as much as it did...

...same with the N64 to GCN generation.

My statement said 'LET'S ALL TRY TO ACT LIKE...' It's meaning was not ALL PS2 buyers will be PS3 buyers. Some. Not all.
TekkenMaster606

Sorry - I must have misunderstood the context of the rest of your statement of:

'those people buying the Playstation 2 right now are not future Playstation 3 buyers :roll: '

I mean - basic grammar and logic implies that you are stating everyone that buys a PS2 right will be a future PS3 owner, and that everyone in this thread is pretending not to notice that obvious correlation. Followed up with the sarcastic :roll:

My apologies, I should have understood that you didn't mean 'all'...   

:|

[QUOTE="jdknight21"]Where are you all getting your crystal balls from?MaTT2011