Nobody here has played the multiplayer. :|
This topic is locked from further discussion.
It's not just as simple as shooting people in the face so you don't succumb to the worst fate possible, either. Above all else, securing and protecting supplies is imperative to the survival effort. These resources become yet more important as your group grows. While lodging a bullet between someone's eyes will help in your quest, so do assists, revives, crafting items and physically picking up supply drops, obviously. It expands further than this too: members of your posse can suffer from sickness or get mauled by a pack of infected between matches. Overcoming such obstacles requires you to engage in specific missions you'll be set in upcoming rounds, such as achieving a certain amount of melee kills or headshots. It is, to be frank, a very intelligent and well put together idea, and one that unlike many multiplayer modes actually connects to what you've experienced with the game's core narrative. Whether or not the premise is as good as the execution is another thing, mind. http://www.videogamer.com/ps3/the_last_of_us/features/article/the_last_of_us_multiplayer_hands-on.htmlTheGuardian03
So does that confirms that the Infected will make an appearance in the Multiplayer?
[QUOTE="TheGuardian03"]It's not just as simple as shooting people in the face so you don't succumb to the worst fate possible, either. Above all else, securing and protecting supplies is imperative to the survival effort. These resources become yet more important as your group grows. While lodging a bullet between someone's eyes will help in your quest, so do assists, revives, crafting items and physically picking up supply drops, obviously. It expands further than this too: members of your posse can suffer from sickness or get mauled by a pack of infected between matches. Overcoming such obstacles requires you to engage in specific missions you'll be set in upcoming rounds, such as achieving a certain amount of melee kills or headshots. It is, to be frank, a very intelligent and well put together idea, and one that unlike many multiplayer modes actually connects to what you've experienced with the game's core narrative. Whether or not the premise is as good as the execution is another thing, mind. http://www.videogamer.com/ps3/the_last_of_us/features/article/the_last_of_us_multiplayer_hands-on.htmltonitorsi
So does that confirms that the Infected will make an appearance in the Multiplayer?
No it's meta game stuff. Text based events that happen to your NPC "clan" members in between matches.[QUOTE="seanmcloughlin"]
[QUOTE="Xaero_Gravity"] Doesn't help that yesterday's "leak" was so damn inaccurate. :(tonitorsi
What's worse is that the leak sounded so much better lol
The real thing, still got pretty close to the leak. Just minus the big/open maps and the maps containing the Infected.
I'm still amped to see how the whole thing plays out.
They nailed the gameplay.
lol that was the part that sounded cool. The thought of a big map and sort of raiding and securing camps against people and then at any moment infected could burst through and change it all up sounded fvcking cool.
What we get is just a more visceral or methodical Uncharted MP. Which isn't bad, but it's notthing new and definitely not "The best ever conceived"
[QUOTE="Xaero_Gravity"][QUOTE="tonitorsi"]No it's meta game stuff. Text based events that happen to your NPC "clan" members in between matches. was it confirmed? It was mentioned in one of the articles linked in the neoGAF thread.So does that confirms that the Infected will make an appearance in the Multiplayer?
TheGuardian03
So I just saw 3:46 footage of last of us. And lol. What a joke. That stuff is truly horrific. I don't understand why naughty dog can't make multiplayer game that is fun. I mean did you see the footage. It took the person 5 shots to kill someone. This honestly reminds me of the tomb raider multiplayer. I know how there are numerous teams at naughty dog and that is the reason why uncharted 3 was sooo terrible. Was this made by their Z team? I can't fathom how huge of a disappointment this game has turned out.
nhh18
I predict exactly zero people will be getting this game for its multiplayer,seriously TC.............come on.LOL
It was mentioned in one of the articles linked in the neoGAF thread.[QUOTE="Xaero_Gravity"][QUOTE="TheGuardian03"] was it confirmed?TheGuardian03
damn i thought it would be real not that assassins creed mission style, oh well hope for a zombie mode or something.
they have to have a MP mode that has infected and stuff, they haven't revealed yet.
They bloody well better because right now that MP isn't gonna last any length of time.
The MP details leaked sounded amazing and something that I would love to play. I even said it sounded better than the SP :P
Never really bought a Game for the MP unless the game itself was for MP. I purchase a game for the focus of it not the other stuff. I mean considering if it was like that Mario Kart would be the greatest game ever made because you always have something to do. Beating your own track record :roll: yet we play it for the main content... to kick someone's butt on the track.
Yeah I saw the footage and I don't even need to play the game, I'm such a goddamn genius that watching someone else play the game for me is enough for me to call it the multiplayer the worst ever
Idiot
princeofshapeir
I would say the same about the guy who said "BEST MULTIPLAYER EVER CONCEIVED" When in reality is just another pointless tacked in mode that wasn't needed
The game will easily score 96+ on Metacritic, just like UC2 :)
heeweesRus
I hope so.
For SW though I would love it to flop just because this place would be fricken hilarious. But it won't happen
[QUOTE="Davekeeh"]
Game will get 95 or higher on Metacritic
super600
If the MP is average or bad it won't get anywhere near that.
I guess you forgot about Uncharted 2 and Uncharted 3.
[QUOTE="Davekeeh"]
Game will get 95 or higher on Metacritic
super600
If the MP is average or bad it won't get anywhere near that.
you're assuming critics would dare criticize it :? it's GTA4 levels of hype all over again, even more so because it's a new IP, the last thing critics will want to do is give the impression aspects of the game are disappointing, i find it far more likely you'll hear them trying to excuse, or justify what some would just identify as negative aspects of the game; the multiplayer will probably be described as "fun" or "bonus content", or just not mentioned at all.
A better topic would have asked if everyone thought the mediocre multiplayer would hurt the score for the game.
1. Stop trolling 2. Gimme a link to the video 3. What is wrong with taking 5 shots to kill someone? 4. Uncharted 3 is better than 2.campzor
I'm assuming this is the video. Honestly the first min or so is bland, at least to me it does get better around the 1:40 ish mark.
i have faith in ND
yes the meat of this game will be in the single player, but if i want my entire moneys worth, i need a solid multiplayer to keep me playing after the sp.
So I just saw 3:46 footage of last of us. And lol. What a joke. That stuff is truly horrific. I don't understand why naughty dog can't make multiplayer game that is fun. I mean did you see the footage. It took the person 5 shots to kill someone. This honestly reminds me of the tomb raider multiplayer. I know how there are numerous teams at naughty dog and that is the reason why uncharted 3 was sooo terrible. Was this made by their Z team? I can't fathom how huge of a disappointment this game has turned out.
nhh18
And that same footage made me even more interested in the game...
Please Log In to post.
Log in to comment