@quadknight said:
@elkoldo said:
Excellent game with such a thought provoking story. Fully deserved. It even deserves 10 million more if you ask me.
But guys, lets not get ahead of ourselves. The Wither 3 raised the bar far too high for any other game to match any time soon. Both in game play and visuals Horizon has some way to go to match The Witcher 3 (even on a regular (non-Pro) PS4 The Witcher 3 looks considerably superior: draw distances, woods, rivers, sky, nature etc) but the sequels will be promising.
And one mind-blowing fact about this game is that it comes from a studio with zero experience in emotional open-world RPGs. The Killzone franchise, as a relatively shallow sci-fi shooter, is a million miles away from Horizon.
Nah I disagree, HZD has beter visuals and combat than TW3. I play TW3 maxed out on a 4K monitor and HZD on a PS4 Pro hooked up to the same 4K monitor and HZD looks better period. The only thing TW3 has over it is the fact that running on PC you can brute force better image quality but in terms of visuals HZD is untouchable. The combat in TW3 is also clumsy and stiff compared to HZD's. HZD is a graphical masterpiece, there's a reason it won all the technical and graphics awards last year, the game looks insane.
@Jag85 said:
HZD has better combat and visuals than TW3.
Are you two saying that for example, the pixelated sky and indistinct draw distance in HZD actually outperforms for example, Toussaint's views?
The wild life wasn't as vast as TW3, and there were much fewer types of plant life in HZD than TW3. The world map in TW3 was much bigger and much more diverse (orchards, vineyards, villages, jungles, islands, mountains, prairies, lakes etc along with stunning and diverse in-door environments such as various cabins, houses, castles, brothels, taverns etc). Also the facial animations and expressions were so stunning in HZD only in cut scenes and dialogues, and throughout the actual gameplay they had much lower quality, whereas this wasn't the case with TW3 (particularly with Nvidia Hairworks on). Albeit I should add that I played both games an a regular PS4, not on PS4 pro. Now don't get me the wrong way, HZD indeed looked great. But not the greatest.
As for the gameplay, in terms of the number and variety of quests (and side quests) I think you'll agree that TW3 is unsurpassable. The only superiority HZD had over TW3 was the fact that you could study the enemies' weak points on-the-fly (using Focus) but in TW3 you had to stop the game to read the Bestiary which wasn't convenient. (And speaking of Focus, it's crystal-clear that Focus has been copied from the Witcher Senses. It also gives Geralt the superiority of being a natural tracker, yet Aloy couldn't do much without her Focus device :) and the Focus wasn't he only thing that was borrowed from TW3. When roaming Meridian, were you too thinking of Oxenfurt and Novigrad?)
The weapon and equipment variety, oils, potions, decections, magic spells and their wonderful upgrades make the combat in TW3 much more enjoyable (how can all this be 'stiff'?) and humans are too weak and have low AI in HZD, whereas again this wasn't the case with TW3 and fighting humans was no less fun than monsters. And above all, the meaningful and sometimes shocking choices you make throughout the story just give TW3 a depth that is unmatched. (For the record, you never get to make a meaningful and result-altering choice in HZD, with perhaps the only exception being Olin's fate (life or death) which wasn't that decisive anyway.) All of this among many many other features that I simply fail to recall right now, make the TW3 a legend, and HZD as great as it was (particularly baring in mind that it was Guerilla's first open-world RPG), has to work its way up to match TW3.
Log in to comment