Get it though your thick skull, PS3 in the end has more power then the 360.

  • 82 results
  • 1
  • 2

This topic is locked from further discussion.

Avatar image for Nteks
Nteks

673

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#1 Nteks
Member since 2007 • 673 Posts
Carmack and  Itagaki saids so.
Avatar image for SuperKnightX
SuperKnightX

402

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#2 SuperKnightX
Member since 2007 • 402 Posts

Indeed, but you didn't have to make a thread about it lol lemmings being themselves will still deny and damage control..

*goes to play motorstorm*

Avatar image for Tony_DiNozzo
Tony_DiNozzo

241

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#3 Tony_DiNozzo
Member since 2006 • 241 Posts
Doesn't matter if it is too difficult to program for.  Developers will never be able to use all that power.
Avatar image for SuperKnightX
SuperKnightX

402

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#4 SuperKnightX
Member since 2007 • 402 Posts
Doesn't matter if it is too difficult to program for.  Developers will never be able to use all that power.Tony_DiNozzo
No console is ever tapped till its last drop..
Avatar image for immortality20
immortality20

8546

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 36

User Lists: 0

#5 immortality20
Member since 2005 • 8546 Posts
One would think the insane price isn't for nothing.
Avatar image for Nteks
Nteks

673

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#6 Nteks
Member since 2007 • 673 Posts
Doesn't matter if it is too difficult to program for. Developers will never be able to use all that power.Tony_DiNozzo
Being difficult to develop for proves it's superiority to the 360. While all the 360's power is laid to bare PS3 still has more power left in spades.
Avatar image for Solid-CELL
Solid-CELL

5910

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#7 Solid-CELL
Member since 2006 • 5910 Posts
Doesn't matter if it is too difficult to program for. Developers will never be able to use all that power.Tony_DiNozzo
which is why Dev's now have Sony's EDGE tools to make better use of it
Avatar image for fuzzysquash
fuzzysquash

17374

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 42

User Lists: 0

#8 fuzzysquash
Member since 2004 • 17374 Posts
In raw horsepower yes, but from what I understand the 360's GPU is better and more efficient
Avatar image for heretrix
heretrix

37881

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 6

User Lists: 0

#9 heretrix
Member since 2004 • 37881 Posts
Yeah, that's really helping Sony put games on the shelf.
Avatar image for mark4091
mark4091

3780

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#10 mark4091
Member since 2007 • 3780 Posts
Nobody wants to make games for it, and it would be more powerful if the cell was actually able to be used to play games.
Avatar image for ironwarrior2
ironwarrior2

2590

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#11 ironwarrior2
Member since 2006 • 2590 Posts
Yes, but I will be glad when we see that power with better games
Avatar image for blackace
blackace

23576

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 4

User Lists: 0

#12 blackace
Member since 2002 • 23576 Posts

Carmack and  Itagaki saids so. Nteks

That's great. It's unfortunate that 85% of the developers will never figure out how to tap that power within the PS3 lifespan. It's also unfortunate that the XBox 360 is outselling the PS3 by 2:1 and the Wii but 3:1. Who cares how powerful a system is if no one is buying it and all the exclusive games are being moved to other platforms? Where are the games? Now get that through your thick skull.

*This post has been ownaged approved by the lemmings of the world.* copyright 2007.

Avatar image for Nteks
Nteks

673

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#13 Nteks
Member since 2007 • 673 Posts

[QUOTE="Nteks"]Carmack and Itagaki saids so. blackace

That's great. It's unfortunate that 85% of the developers will never figure out how to tap that power within the PS3 lifespan. It's also unfortunate that the XBox 360 is outselling the PS3 by 2:1 and the Wii but 3:1. Who cares how powerful a system is if no one is buying it and all the exclusive games are being moved to other platforms? Where are the games? Now get that through your thick skull.

*This post has been ownaged approved by the lemmings of the world.* copyright 2007.

PS3 still more powerful.
Avatar image for venture00
venture00

1060

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#14 venture00
Member since 2004 • 1060 Posts

Why cows dont post all what carmack said?

So says John Carmack, the legendary programmer of the Doom and Quake series, in an intriguing interview with Buzzscope. Though Carmack expresses a "preference" for the Xbox 360's CPU design, he admits that the PS3 "will have a bit more peak power."

Sony fans shouldn't break out the champagne just yet, however, as Carmack notes that "it will be easier to exploit the available power on the 360."

So basically he said that the ps3 processor is a bit more powerfull than the xbox360 one, and we know that xbox360 GPU its a lot better than the RSX and the Cell processor's better than the x360 processor.
So we know that

Xenos>>>>>RSX
Cell>>>>>Xenon


TC i think u selfown yourself a little bit :P

Avatar image for Stonin
Stonin

3021

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#15 Stonin
Member since 2006 • 3021 Posts

*sniffs the air*

 

I smell damage control. 

Avatar image for ithilgore2006
ithilgore2006

10494

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 6

User Lists: 0

#16 ithilgore2006
Member since 2006 • 10494 Posts
[QUOTE="blackace"]

[QUOTE="Nteks"]Carmack and Itagaki saids so. Nteks

That's great. It's unfortunate that 85% of the developers will never figure out how to tap that power within the PS3 lifespan. It's also unfortunate that the XBox 360 is outselling the PS3 by 2:1 and the Wii but 3:1. Who cares how powerful a system is if no one is buying it and all the exclusive games are being moved to other platforms? Where are the games? Now get that through your thick skull.

*This post has been ownaged approved by the lemmings of the world.* copyright 2007.

PS3 still more powerful.

So what? Power didn't help the Xbox last generation, or the N64 in the previous generation. Power hasn't helped the PSP.
Avatar image for Nugtoka
Nugtoka

1812

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#17 Nugtoka
Member since 2003 • 1812 Posts
Sorry bud 360 has a better GPU and CPU and RAM that makes sense for game development. Cell wasn't designed as a game processor Sony just wanted to see it used and get some $$$ back out of there R&D PS3 has a better chance of curing cancer then it does beating the 360. Get that through your thick skull Sucka!
Avatar image for ironwarrior2
ironwarrior2

2590

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#18 ironwarrior2
Member since 2006 • 2590 Posts

Sorry bud 360 has a better GPU and CPU and RAM that makes sense for game development. Cell wasn't designed as a game processor Sony just wanted to see it used and get some $$$ back out of there R&D PS3 has a better chance of curing cancer then it does beating the 360. Get that through your thick skull Sucka!Nugtoka

Better gpu maybe.  Better cpu?  No way.  Cell is awesome.

Avatar image for PayDaMurdaMan
PayDaMurdaMan

585

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#19 PayDaMurdaMan
Member since 2006 • 585 Posts
[QUOTE="Tony_DiNozzo"]Doesn't matter if it is too difficult to program for. Developers will never be able to use all that power.Nteks
Being difficult to develop for proves it's superiority to the 360. While all the 360's power is laid to bare PS3 still has more power left in spades.

Before you write about something learn about it. Its true the PS3 has more theoretical power but thats not why its more difficult to program for. Its more difficult because its not a unified architecture. If you know what that means then you would understand that the Cell processor was never ment for games. When the Devs figure out how to program for that then the PS3 will be better for A.I and physics but the 360 will always have a slightly better GPU and I mean slight. The difference will be very small in the end but I would rather have the better physics and A.I. then better graghics when the difference is that small which is why I bought both systems. All these threads fail because people think that one system will be so much better then the other when that will never be.
Avatar image for ironcreed
ironcreed

14195

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 46

User Lists: 0

#20 ironcreed
Member since 2005 • 14195 Posts

Absolutely right, but you try in vain, dear friend....even in using verbal blunt force trauma in order to try get this FACT through certain people's "thick skulls", the efforts are futile, lol. Sadly, that particular kind of fanboy, brand loyalty denial is beyond penetration by THE TRUTH. I would like to share an example in the form of a fable of of how often times truth finds us while we are the ones looking for it. But all too often, we are just too blind to see it....even when it is staring us right in the face, lol.  

One day The truth came knocking on the door of the blind little fanboy, and the fanboy said", "GO AWAY, I'M LOOKING FOR THE TRUTH!"....So good ole' truth just shrugged it's shoulders in confusion, and left the poor, blind little fanboy to continue evermore his futile search for false truth in all the wrong places.:lol:  

Avatar image for mig-fulcrum
mig-fulcrum

260

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#21 mig-fulcrum
Member since 2004 • 260 Posts
The first wave of PS3 games have been comparable with current 360 games (sometimes slightly better, sometimes slightly worse). As time passes, I'm pretty sure the PS3 will become the most visually impresive console we've seen to date.  Sony just has to make sure it give developers incentive to use the PS3's potential.  For multi-platform games, it would also help if the PS3 was the primary development sku.
Avatar image for Raidea
Raidea

4366

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#22 Raidea
Member since 2006 • 4366 Posts

[QUOTE="Tony_DiNozzo"]Doesn't matter if it is too difficult to program for. Developers will never be able to use all that power.Nteks
Being difficult to develop for proves it's superiority to the 360. While all the 360's power is laid to bare PS3 still has more power left in spades.

Oh please, that's such a silly argument. Development difficulty and console power are in no way linked!

The PS3 is more powerful, but when games like Oblivion have to be delayed because porting is difficult and after the delay the version ends up looking the same as the 360 version you have to ask yourself whether the "untapped powa!" is ever going to show.

As for the 360s power being laid bare, you don't think the graphics of 360 games will improve? 

Avatar image for Poppa_pain
Poppa_pain

2660

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#23 Poppa_pain
Member since 2003 • 2660 Posts
[QUOTE="Tony_DiNozzo"]Doesn't matter if it is too difficult to program for. Developers will never be able to use all that power.Nteks
Being difficult to develop for proves it's superiority to the 360. While all the 360's power is laid to bare PS3 still has more power left in spades.

Difficulty in programing means superiority in a system and power? I guess this rock Ive been programming owns all the systems because its so hard to get software running on it. :roll:
Avatar image for PayDaMurdaMan
PayDaMurdaMan

585

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#24 PayDaMurdaMan
Member since 2006 • 585 Posts

[QUOTE="Nteks"][QUOTE="Tony_DiNozzo"]Doesn't matter if it is too difficult to program for. Developers will never be able to use all that power.Raidea

Being difficult to develop for proves it's superiority to the 360. While all the 360's power is laid to bare PS3 still has more power left in spades.

Oh please, that's such a silly argument. Development difficulty and console power are in no way linked!

The PS3 is more powerful, but when games like Oblivion have to be delayed because porting is difficult and after the delay the version ends up looking the same as the 360 version you have to ask yourself whether the "untapped powa!" is ever going to show.

As for the 360s power being laid bare, you don't think the graphics of 360 games will improve? 

The PS3 verson of Oblivion looks way better then the 360 verson before the update. After the udate not so much but still looks slightly better then the 360. That is to be expected though with over a year of extra dev time.
Avatar image for PayDaMurdaMan
PayDaMurdaMan

585

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#25 PayDaMurdaMan
Member since 2006 • 585 Posts
[QUOTE="Nteks"][QUOTE="Tony_DiNozzo"]Doesn't matter if it is too difficult to program for. Developers will never be able to use all that power.Poppa_pain
Being difficult to develop for proves it's superiority to the 360. While all the 360's power is laid to bare PS3 still has more power left in spades.

Difficulty in programing means superiority in a system and power? I guess this rock Ive been programming owns all the systems because its so hard to get software running on it. :roll:

lol that was a good one.
Avatar image for Spartan070
Spartan070

16497

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#26 Spartan070
Member since 2004 • 16497 Posts
360s CPU is more efficient and easier to develop for. The GPU is simply more powerful. Therefore 360 architecture > PS3 architecture.
Avatar image for grovestreet12
grovestreet12

1801

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#27 grovestreet12
Member since 2006 • 1801 Posts

Nice having a thick Skull....Good for nutting people like you ;)

Avatar image for SuperKnightX
SuperKnightX

402

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#28 SuperKnightX
Member since 2007 • 402 Posts

360s CPU is more efficient and easier to develop for. The GPU is simply more powerful. Therefore 360 architecture > PS3 architecture.Spartan070
wth? :|

just stop now lol

Avatar image for thirstychainsaw
thirstychainsaw

3761

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#29 thirstychainsaw
Member since 2007 • 3761 Posts

Theoretically, probably. But in practice? Who knows?

 

Also can you find a developer that says the PS3 is more powerful, after it's release? 

Avatar image for Spartan070
Spartan070

16497

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#30 Spartan070
Member since 2004 • 16497 Posts

[QUOTE="Spartan070"]360s CPU is more efficient and easier to develop for. The GPU is simply more powerful. Therefore 360 architecture > PS3 architecture.SuperKnightX

wth? :|

just stop now lol

:? Where have you been for the past year and a half?
Avatar image for SuperKnightX
SuperKnightX

402

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#31 SuperKnightX
Member since 2007 • 402 Posts
r

Theoretically, probably. But in practice? Who knows?

 

Also can you find a developer that says the PS3 is more powerful, after it's release? 

thirstychainsaw
That made no sense :lol: Did the specs change before and after the release? Carmack and Itagaki both have companies or people working on PS3 games at the moment. So they are valid - no arguement necessary.
Avatar image for Skippyj9
Skippyj9

2825

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 25

User Lists: 0

#32 Skippyj9
Member since 2004 • 2825 Posts
Doesn't matter if it is too difficult to program for. Developers will never be able to use all that power.Tony_DiNozzo
Edge is a developing tool for the PS3 that either just recently or very soon got released and games made with it will start to appear as early as late 2007. Edge simplifies the development process for PS3 games.
Avatar image for thirstychainsaw
thirstychainsaw

3761

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#33 thirstychainsaw
Member since 2007 • 3761 Posts
r[QUOTE="thirstychainsaw"]

Theoretically, probably. But in practice? Who knows?

 

Also can you find a developer that says the PS3 is more powerful, after it's release?

SuperKnightX

That made no sense :lol: Did the specs change before and after the release? Carmack and Itagaki both have companies or people working on PS3 games at the moment. So they are valid - no arguement necessary.

Can you?

Avatar image for SuperKnightX
SuperKnightX

402

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#34 SuperKnightX
Member since 2007 • 402 Posts
[QUOTE="SuperKnightX"]r[QUOTE="thirstychainsaw"]

Theoretically, probably. But in practice? Who knows?

 

Also can you find a developer that says the PS3 is more powerful, after it's release?

thirstychainsaw

That made no sense :lol: Did the specs change before and after the release? Carmack and Itagaki both have companies or people working on PS3 games at the moment. So they are valid - no arguement necessary.

Can you?

Can I what?

 

Avatar image for SegArgyle
SegArgyle

2371

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#35 SegArgyle
Member since 2004 • 2371 Posts
too bad no one cares, lol, more power dosen't mean squat, ps3 is doomed
Avatar image for LordoverFeind
LordoverFeind

1041

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#36 LordoverFeind
Member since 2006 • 1041 Posts

Carmack and Itagaki saids so. Nteks

 

Having power and knowing how to use it are two diffrent things = Raoh from fist of the northstar

Avatar image for daveg1
daveg1

20405

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 9

User Lists: 0

#37 daveg1
Member since 2005 • 20405 Posts
computational  power yes but graphical NO!!!
Avatar image for SuperKnightX
SuperKnightX

402

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#38 SuperKnightX
Member since 2007 • 402 Posts

computational  power yes but graphical NO!!!daveg1
Self-ownage post of the day :lol:

What does more power equate to?

Avatar image for kyle-244
kyle-244

1198

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#39 kyle-244
Member since 2006 • 1198 Posts
Yeah, that's really helping Sony put games on the shelf.heretrix
:lol:
Avatar image for KEITH1437
KEITH1437

2735

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 11

User Lists: 0

#40 KEITH1437
Member since 2006 • 2735 Posts

you crabs and your craziness :P

remember, the graphics on the 360 are so good that sony used a pic from pgr3 to promote GT:HD

Avatar image for gamerguy31315
gamerguy31315

532

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 4

User Lists: 0

#41 gamerguy31315
Member since 2005 • 532 Posts
it should be morew powerful with the freakin dumb price tag, and it has no good games and when it DOES actually get some good ones 360 will be getting MORE (note the more, not just STARTING to get good games) and will still be in the lead.. I saw a post one time for someone who said he had gotten a PS3 and since it had no good games he was lookin for good ps2 games.. lol thats pitiful. having to play last gen games cause ur console doesnt have any good ones this gen.
Avatar image for KEITH1437
KEITH1437

2735

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 11

User Lists: 0

#42 KEITH1437
Member since 2006 • 2735 Posts
it should be morew powerful with the freakin dumb price tag, and it has no good games and when it DOES actually get some good ones 360 will be getting MORE (note the more, not just STARTING to get good games) and will still be in the lead.. I saw a post one time for someone who said he had gotten a PS3 and since it had no good games he was lookin for good ps2 games.. lol thats pitiful. having to play last gen games cause ur console doesnt have any good ones this gen. gamerguy31315
agreeded
Avatar image for Radeon_X1950XTX
Radeon_X1950XTX

1055

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#43 Radeon_X1950XTX
Member since 2006 • 1055 Posts
[QUOTE="Tony_DiNozzo"]Doesn't matter if it is too difficult to program for. Developers will never be able to use all that power.Nteks
Being difficult to develop for proves it's superiority to the 360. While all the 360's power is laid to bare PS3 still has more power left in spades.

fanboy, ps3 has a more powerfull cpu, but it will never be surpassing the 360 due to its bottlenecks
Avatar image for amirkalloe
amirkalloe

21997

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#44 amirkalloe
Member since 2005 • 21997 Posts
By that time, Microsoft will ship the new xbox :roll:
Avatar image for Radeon_X1950XTX
Radeon_X1950XTX

1055

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#45 Radeon_X1950XTX
Member since 2006 • 1055 Posts
cell>xenon xenos>rsx-proven PS3 has 256mb System ram, and 256 graphics ram, this will be the bottleneck, ps3 has a FIXED memory archetechure,(its faster but limited) RSX can write on System ram, but Cell cannot write on RSX therfore limited,(thats why gears cannot run on pos3) 360 has slower ram, but flexible, it can go either way, as long as it doesnt exeed 512, mb ram, +(10 mb EDRAM) 360 and ps3 power will all come down to ram, and 360 is supirior in that area*especailly in the long run*
Avatar image for Heith
Heith

1231

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#47 Heith
Member since 2003 • 1231 Posts

[QUOTE="Radeon_X1950XTX"]cell>xenon xenos>rsx-proven PS3 has 256mb System ram, and 256 graphics ram, this will be the bottleneck, ps3 has a FIXED memory archetechure,(its faster but limited) RSX can write on System ram, but Cell cannot write on RSX therfore limited,(thats why gears cannot run on pos3) 360 has slower ram, but flexible, it can go either way, as long as it doesnt exeed 512, mb ram, +(10 mb EDRAM) 360 and ps3 power will all come down to ram, and 360 is supirior in that area*especailly in the long run*SuperKnightX

End of credibility. You are now officially a gullible fanboy. How come Gears can't run on PS3 but UT3, a more technically impressive and larger game in terms of environment and just EVERYTHING run on the PS3??

Self-ownage complete dude, you are done.

Add a little motion blur, reduce draw lines, and PS3 can run any game the 360 can.  Not as well, though.
Avatar image for SuperKnightX
SuperKnightX

402

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#48 SuperKnightX
Member since 2007 • 402 Posts
[QUOTE="SuperKnightX"]

[QUOTE="Radeon_X1950XTX"]cell>xenon xenos>rsx-proven PS3 has 256mb System ram, and 256 graphics ram, this will be the bottleneck, ps3 has a FIXED memory archetechure,(its faster but limited) RSX can write on System ram, but Cell cannot write on RSX therfore limited,(thats why gears cannot run on pos3) 360 has slower ram, but flexible, it can go either way, as long as it doesnt exeed 512, mb ram, +(10 mb EDRAM) 360 and ps3 power will all come down to ram, and 360 is supirior in that area*especailly in the long run*Heith

End of credibility. You are now officially a gullible fanboy. How come Gears can't run on PS3 but UT3, a more technically impressive and larger game in terms of environment and just EVERYTHING run on the PS3??

Self-ownage complete dude, you are done.

Add a little motion blur, reduce draw lines, and PS3 can run any game the 360 can.  Not as well, though.

I could say the same for PS3 game to X360.

and with games like Lair with 100s of dragons on screen, draw distances of miles and running at 1080p. Why would any idiot seriously belive GeOW couldn't run on PS3 lol and then add the fact that UT3 is coming to both consoles and its more advanced than GeOW, then you see my point..

Avatar image for daveg1
daveg1

20405

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 9

User Lists: 0

#49 daveg1
Member since 2005 • 20405 Posts

[QUOTE="daveg1"]computational  power yes but graphical NO!!!SuperKnightX

Self-ownage post of the day :lol:

What does more power equate to?

eh? do you even know the difference between a cpu and gpu??
Avatar image for KodiakGTS
KodiakGTS

1262

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#50 KodiakGTS
Member since 2003 • 1262 Posts

[QUOTE="Radeon_X1950XTX"]cell>xenon xenos>rsx-proven PS3 has 256mb System ram, and 256 graphics ram, this will be the bottleneck, ps3 has a FIXED memory archetechure,(its faster but limited) RSX can write on System ram, but Cell cannot write on RSX therfore limited,(thats why gears cannot run on pos3) 360 has slower ram, but flexible, it can go either way, as long as it doesnt exeed 512, mb ram, +(10 mb EDRAM) 360 and ps3 power will all come down to ram, and 360 is supirior in that area*especailly in the long run*SuperKnightX

End of credibility. You are now officially a gullible fanboy. How come Gears can't run on PS3 but UT3, a more technically impressive and larger game in terms of environment and just EVERYTHING run on the PS3??

Self-ownage complete dude, you are done.

Actually UT3 isn't really technically more impressive than gears, they are running on essentially the same engine, although UT3 is obviously going to push that engine further, because of more development time. But yes, Gears would be possible on PS3. I do believe there will eventually be certain games for each system that could not run on the other. On the one hand, the Cell is a very powerful processing system, allowing PS3 to have certain advantages over X360, yet on the other, the drawbacks of the RSX when compared to the Xenos are both real and obvious, particularly in the implementation and use of RAM.