Gamespot Feature: Graphics Comparison 2

If you haven't seen it:

http://www.gamespot.com/features/6171831/index.html?tag=topslot;title;2

Think we are pretty much splitting hairs in the graphics. But everything on the PS3 seems to be faded.

Sorry if old.

Not much, but PS3 is brighter and slight less detail.hummer700

I think you're finding it less detailed because of the brightness. I don't see differences in any of these games quite honestly.

It looks pretty much the same, the PS3 has a slight edge on the 360 for Oblivion (however extra time is why that is). SpiderMan 3 does look better on the 360; however it is SpiderMan 3 and shouldn't count (it sucks on all consoles)

[QUOTE="hummer700"]Not much, but PS3 is brighter and slight less detail.purplemidgets

I think you're finding it less detailed because of the brightness. I don't see differences in any of these games quite honestly.

The impression I have gotten between the 2 consoles is that the ps3 has more vivid colors while the 360 has better textures and a grittier look.

I think that is just how it is when comparing Nvidia and ATI though, as well.

Interesting.

Funny to watch the crowds in MLB07 become PS1 quality on mouseover for the PS3 version, yet it has much worse framerate.:?

Edit: they even turned of soft self-shadowing for the PS3 version to get framerates up. Who are the devs responsible?

Not much, but PS3 is brighter and slight less detail.hummer700

I found the PS3 have more detail. Looking at a the 4th Image.

It's obvious by now, Xbox360 has better graphics, ps3 looks more blurry and less smooth. When it comes to graphics, the xbox360 is better. themyth01

It looks pretty much the same, the PS3 has a slight edge on the 360 for Oblivion (however extra time is why that is). SpiderMan 3 does look better on the 360; however it is SpiderMan 3 and shouldn't count (it sucks on all consoles)

Chaos_HL21

Lemmings have been proven wrong. They kept claiiming the 360 graphics update for Oblivion would kill the PS3 Oblivion version and by a landslide the PS3 has more then an edge and its as clear as night and day that PS3's version look's better proving that PS3 does in fact have more potential of the two even though their identical in power. If it were powerlevels I would say 360's powerlevel is 50,000 and PS3's is 52,000 and Wii's is around 6,000 :lol: which is not even over 9,000.

PS3 has AF, where the xflop version has a blurry floor.

the textues are more crisp on PS3

360 has better color contrast, light effect, textures and less jaggies
ps3 is too blurry and under-detailedgamergeekgeek

360 has better color contrast, light effect, textures and less jaggies
ps3 is too blurry and under-detailedgamergeekgeek

oblivion and RB6 vegas say otherwise

oblivion's the only game that ps3 beats 360

Not only these games looks better on the 360, it also plays better, and have better scores.

[QUOTE="gamergeekgeek"]360 has better color contrast, light effect, textures and less jaggies
ps3 is too blurry and under-detailedl1mIt

oblivion and RB6 vegas say otherwise

yeah, 1 year extra development time should be enough

Are people that blind? if you look at Armored Core 4the ground in all the screenshots ps3 > 360, the 360 has smaller draw distance for the textures. think the devs went to far with the blur effect. but the ps3 wins imo.

Looking at those comparisons I think you could argue all day about which what looks better and it would be stupid. If you were playing it on your tv, went away and came back a few hours later, you probably wouldn't even realize what wss different.

better lighting on the 360. it's subtle, but you can pick it out in a few places.. looking at the shadowing on the mech in the very last shot, there's some shadows that just plain don't exist on the ps3 shot. something like that could be attributed to gpu differences, i guess.. soft shadowing and full hdr tend to KILL nvidia 7x00-generation cards hardcore.Makari

Anyone think gamespot is dicking around with the PS3 version

turning up the brightness on all shots? :?

on any HDTV if you prolly turn the brightness down to 43 or 40 it prolly looks like the 360 version.

[QUOTE="Chaos_HL21"]

It looks pretty much the same, the PS3 has a slight edge on the 360 for Oblivion (however extra time is why that is). SpiderMan 3 does look better on the 360; however it is SpiderMan 3 and shouldn't count (it sucks on all consoles)

Silvereign

Lemmings have been proven wrong. They kept claiiming the 360 graphics update for Oblivion would kill the PS3 Oblivion version and by a landslide the PS3 has more then an edge and its as clear as night and day that PS3's version look's better proving that PS3 does in fact have more potential of the two even though their identical in power. If it were powerlevels I would say 360's powerlevel is 50,000 and PS3's is 52,000 and Wii's is around 6,000 :lol: which is not even over 9,000.

the graphics update hasnt come for oblivion for 360 yet u just owned yourself begone COW!!!

360 has better Frame rates :)KillaHalo2o9

anyone notice that every 360 game is dark to hide the flaws?

AC4

PS3: Better road textures.

Xbox 360: Better AA, less blur at distance, reflections in windows are better and not bright.

DJI

PS3: Guy on porch has white shirt.

Xbox 360: Better AA, smoother look and not bright. Guy on porch has red shirt.

NBA: SH

PS3: 8 people observing.

Xbox 360: 5 people observing, better AA and slight better models and not bright.

VT 3

PS3: ~

Xbox 360: Not blurry, softer shadows, slightly better textures and not bright.

Oblivion

PS3: Less bloom = sharper textures.

Xbox 360: Better AA, better lighting (HDR) and not bright.

SM 3

PS3: ~

Xbox 360: More detail at distance... Some other minor things that are better. Like softer shadows.

MLB 2K7

PS3: Baggier shirts.

Xbox 360: More detail on ground, better AA, clearer looking crowd, less baggy shirts and not bright.

[QUOTE="l1mIt"]

[QUOTE="gamergeekgeek"]360 has better color contrast, light effect, textures and less jaggies
ps3 is too blurry and under-detailedgamergeekgeek

oblivion and RB6 vegas say otherwise

yeah, 1 year extra development time should be enough

The PS3 also came out a year after the 360.

[QUOTE="gamergeekgeek"][QUOTE="l1mIt"]

[QUOTE="gamergeekgeek"]360 has better color contrast, light effect, textures and less jaggies
ps3 is too blurry and under-detailedBrownWalrus

oblivion and RB6 vegas say otherwise

yeah, 1 year extra development time should be enough

The PS3 also came out a year after the 360.

yep, devs are still getting about the same experiance time that they did with the 360, on a console that's harder to dev for...

They should of used HDMI with the ps3 and turned on full RGB. The games looks the same except for the ps3 versions being brighter. Seriously, that basically (mostly) the only difference I can discern and it sucks because it makes the textures looks worse than they actually are. Like the virtua tennis (like someone else said) I have the ps3 demo and it's definitely not that washed out...munu9

What the hell did they used? component for both consoles?

[QUOTE="KillaHalo2o9"]360 has better Frame rates :)ForTheNguyen

anyone notice that every 360 game is dark to hide the flaws?

No words at all.