• 146 results
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3

This topic is locked from further discussion.

Avatar image for wiiwillwiiwill
wiiwillwiiwill

387

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#1 wiiwillwiiwill
Member since 2007 • 387 Posts

ps3, xb360 all use 1024X640, ONLY PC VERSION support 1080p , DX10.

CAPCOM Europe from the official statement will be Devil May Cry TM 4 issued on February 8. XBOX360/PC/PS3 three-oriented platform.

PC version will supports DX9 and DX10 versions.The PC version support higher resolution (In order to
maintain stability in the game at 60 FPS, XBOX360, PS3 supports only 1024 * 640 resolution).

More sophisticated textures and models. DX10 will support more graphics technology and advanced
physics, will bring greater is the visual impact. At the same time, played on the new multi-core processors perfect, if you have the updated platform, you will be good experience!

Features:

From the producer of the original Devil May Cry TM and Resident Evil TM 4
High-definition visuals moving at 60 frames per second
Blend of familiar and new: newcomer Nero clashes with veteran Dante
New characters and environments
Signature blend of guns and swordplay
Deep combo system rewards stylish dispatching of enemies
Unique "Devil Bringer" arm opens up a range of combo options
Distinct set of weaponry and moves for Nero and Dante
Exceed System allows Nero to charge up his sword with a throttle effect, revving up to three levels with powerful attack options
New active ****change system for Dante allows him to switch **** and weapons on the fly, producing crazy combo possibilities

Avatar image for VendettaRed07
VendettaRed07

14012

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#2 VendettaRed07
Member since 2007 • 14012 Posts
whatever, the game looks incredible on all systems
Avatar image for Zeliard9
Zeliard9

6030

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#3 Zeliard9
Member since 2007 • 6030 Posts
Consoles sure seem to be having some trouble with this whole "HD" thing.
Avatar image for EPaul
EPaul

9917

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#4 EPaul
Member since 2006 • 9917 Posts
Does it really matter the game looks gorgeous
Avatar image for BreakingPoint8
BreakingPoint8

3347

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#5 BreakingPoint8
Member since 2007 • 3347 Posts
I'm so going to lose sleep over this tonight.
Avatar image for munu9
munu9

11109

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 8

User Lists: 0

#6 munu9
Member since 2004 • 11109 Posts
Link for the 640p part? Anyways, the console version looks great and play great. Oh noes! Teh PC version looks a little bit better!! That totally worth teh $400+ extra I payed for the PC over a console!!!
Avatar image for Zeliard9
Zeliard9

6030

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#7 Zeliard9
Member since 2007 • 6030 Posts

Link for the 640p part? Anyways, the console version looks great and play great. Oh noes! Teh PC version looks a little bit better!! That totally worth teh $400+ extra I payed for the PC over a console!!! munu9

You're right, gaming PCs are built for the HD.

Avatar image for TyrantDragon55
TyrantDragon55

6851

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#8 TyrantDragon55
Member since 2004 • 6851 Posts
What's the PC version's system requirments?
Avatar image for t3hTwinky
t3hTwinky

3701

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 4

User Lists: 0

#9 t3hTwinky
Member since 2005 • 3701 Posts
I would be willing to bet that the PC version is going to be glitchy and terribly optimised.
Avatar image for Taalon
Taalon

3424

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#10 Taalon
Member since 2006 • 3424 Posts
I would be willing to bet that the PC version is going to be glitchy and terribly optimised.t3hTwinky


Not to mention the controls would suck. Lost Planet PC port anyone?
Avatar image for Zeliard9
Zeliard9

6030

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#11 Zeliard9
Member since 2007 • 6030 Posts

I would be willing to bet that the PC version is going to be glitchy and terribly optimised.t3hTwinky

Judging from Capcom's track record, this is likely. It's just a little confounding that all these big hitters keep coming up short of an actual HD resolution on consoles.

Avatar image for Jack-o-Thompson
Jack-o-Thompson

2166

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#12 Jack-o-Thompson
Member since 2007 • 2166 Posts
can a 8600 gt do DX10?
Avatar image for wiiwillwiiwill
wiiwillwiiwill

387

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#13 wiiwillwiiwill
Member since 2007 • 387 Posts

can a 8600 gt do DX10?Jack-o-Thompson

yes, but drop framerate significantly.

Avatar image for LibertySaint
LibertySaint

6500

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#14 LibertySaint
Member since 2007 • 6500 Posts
ooooo, oh well i don't mind those console resolutions...but it looks like cows can't plain the xbox for this resolution like they do with halo 3 doing this and making cod4 and ac do that on the ps3....
Avatar image for Taalon
Taalon

3424

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#15 Taalon
Member since 2006 • 3424 Posts
ooooo, oh well i don't mind those console resolutions...but it looks like cows can't plain the xbox for this resolution like they do with halo 3 doing this and making cod4 and ac do that on the ps3....LibertySaint


What on earth are you talking about? That post made no sense.
Avatar image for Jack-o-Thompson
Jack-o-Thompson

2166

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#16 Jack-o-Thompson
Member since 2007 • 2166 Posts

[QUOTE="Jack-o-Thompson"]can a 8600 gt do DX10?wiiwillwiiwill

yes, but drop framerate significantly.

:( oh wells DX9 should be fine I guess.

Avatar image for _Dispair_
_Dispair_

645

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#17 _Dispair_
Member since 2007 • 645 Posts

I thought it was 720p

Oh well, it still looks kickass

Avatar image for LibertySaint
LibertySaint

6500

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#18 LibertySaint
Member since 2007 • 6500 Posts

[QUOTE="LibertySaint"]ooooo, oh well i don't mind those console resolutions...but it looks like cows can't plain the xbox for this resolution like they do with halo 3 doing this and making cod4 and ac do that on the ps3....Taalon


What on earth are you talking about? That post made no sense.

remember when cows said, "haha, halo 3 only does 640p" and then later found out cod4 does 600p and said it was cause it was on the xbox and thats why cod4 did 600 p and not a true hd res, they came to that conclusion because halo 3 works in 640p....with this dmc4 the ps3 is the lead sku and it still a lower res like in halo 3 and cod4....so cows can't blame the xbox...sorry my grammer sucked in that early post.

Avatar image for Action-Gamer
Action-Gamer

199

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#19 Action-Gamer
Member since 2008 • 199 Posts
I'm so going to lose sleep over this tonight.BreakingPoint8
So will I.
Avatar image for wiiwillwiiwill
wiiwillwiiwill

387

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#20 wiiwillwiiwill
Member since 2007 • 387 Posts

[QUOTE="Taalon"][QUOTE="LibertySaint"]ooooo, oh well i don't mind those console resolutions...but it looks like cows can't plain the xbox for this resolution like they do with halo 3 doing this and making cod4 and ac do that on the ps3....LibertySaint



What on earth are you talking about? That post made no sense.

remember when cows said, "haha, halo 3 only does 640p" and then later found out cod4 does 600p and said it was cause it was on the xbox and thats why cod4 did 600 p and not a true hd res, they came to that conclusion because halo 3 works in 640p....with this dmc4 the ps3 is the lead sku and it still a lower res like in halo 3 and cod4....so cows can't blame the xbox...sorry my grammer sucked in that early post.

it's not the blueray or dvd9 issue, cod4, dmc4 all support higher res on pc, pc is also dvd.

cause console have limited ram, xb360, ps3 all 512mb.

Avatar image for LibertySaint
LibertySaint

6500

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#21 LibertySaint
Member since 2007 • 6500 Posts
[QUOTE="LibertySaint"]

[QUOTE="Taalon"][QUOTE="LibertySaint"]ooooo, oh well i don't mind those console resolutions...but it looks like cows can't plain the xbox for this resolution like they do with halo 3 doing this and making cod4 and ac do that on the ps3....wiiwillwiiwill



What on earth are you talking about? That post made no sense.

remember when cows said, "haha, halo 3 only does 640p" and then later found out cod4 does 600p and said it was cause it was on the xbox and thats why cod4 did 600 p and not a true hd res, they came to that conclusion because halo 3 works in 640p....with this dmc4 the ps3 is the lead sku and it still a lower res like in halo 3 and cod4....so cows can't blame the xbox...sorry my grammer sucked in that early post.

it's not the blueray or dvd9 issue, cod4, dmc4 all support higher res on pc, pc is also dvd.

cause console have limited ram, xb360, ps3 all 512mb.

yes....just nm, thats not what i'm talking about.

Avatar image for Vampyronight
Vampyronight

3933

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#22 Vampyronight
Member since 2002 • 3933 Posts
As someone else said, LINK for 640p?
Avatar image for Dark_Knight6
Dark_Knight6

16619

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#23 Dark_Knight6
Member since 2006 • 16619 Posts
I'll settle with slitly inferior and take the vastly superior controls.
Avatar image for munu9
munu9

11109

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 8

User Lists: 0

#24 munu9
Member since 2004 • 11109 Posts

[QUOTE="munu9"]Link for the 640p part? Anyways, the console version looks great and play great. Oh noes! Teh PC version looks a little bit better!! That totally worth teh $400+ extra I payed for the PC over a console!!! Zeliard9

You're right, gaming PCs are built for the HD.

GT5 and blu-ray movies say the ps3 do as well... still haven't given me a link to the 640p part...

Avatar image for cobrax25
cobrax25

9649

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#25 cobrax25
Member since 2006 • 9649 Posts

I'll settle with slitly inferior and take the vastly superior controls. Dark_Knight6

you can use a controller for the PC version.

Avatar image for l-_-l
l-_-l

6718

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#26 l-_-l
Member since 2003 • 6718 Posts
[QUOTE="t3hTwinky"]I would be willing to bet that the PC version is going to be glitchy and terribly optimised.Taalon


Not to mention the controls would suck. Lost Planet PC port anyone?

How would the controls suck when you can use a 360 controller (and PS3 I think) if you wanted. That must mean the console version REALLY sucks seeing it has the same controls. ;)
Avatar image for ReverseCycology
ReverseCycology

9717

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#27 ReverseCycology
Member since 2006 • 9717 Posts

I wouldn't be suprised if more upcoming games isn't fully 720p and 1080p. Another reason why blu ray isn't needed in gaming just yet. I'm tired of the false advertising though.

Avatar image for Udsen
Udsen

3389

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#28 Udsen
Member since 2007 • 3389 Posts

So when Halo 3 is in 640p it's "OMGOMGOMGOMG NOT TRU HD LOL HALO 2.5" but when DMC4 is 640p it's "WHO CARES IT LUKS GOOD!"...?

Just saying.

Avatar image for deathtoallgods
deathtoallgods

577

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#29 deathtoallgods
Member since 2007 • 577 Posts
Looks great on my TV, along with all the the other 600p+ games that have come out. No need to cry over resolution.
Avatar image for LibertySaint
LibertySaint

6500

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#30 LibertySaint
Member since 2007 • 6500 Posts

So when Halo 3 is in 640p it's "OMGOMGOMGOMG NOT TRU HD LOL HALO 2.5" but when DMC4 is 640p it's "WHO CARES IT LUKS GOOD!"...?

Just saying.

Udsen

thats what i'm getting at....

Avatar image for Action-Gamer
Action-Gamer

199

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#31 Action-Gamer
Member since 2008 • 199 Posts
[QUOTE="Udsen"]

So when Halo 3 is in 640p it's "OMGOMGOMGOMG NOT TRU HD LOL HALO 2.5" but when DMC4 is 640p it's "WHO CARES IT LUKS GOOD!"...?

Just saying.

LibertySaint

thats what i'm getting at....

Halo 3 had bullshots and was compared to COD4, Killzone 2 and Crysis. So once again Halo was a victim of its own hype.
Avatar image for Taalon
Taalon

3424

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#32 Taalon
Member since 2006 • 3424 Posts

[QUOTE="Taalon"][QUOTE="LibertySaint"]ooooo, oh well i don't mind those console resolutions...but it looks like cows can't plain the xbox for this resolution like they do with halo 3 doing this and making cod4 and ac do that on the ps3....LibertySaint



What on earth are you talking about? That post made no sense.

remember when cows said, "haha, halo 3 only does 640p" and then later found out cod4 does 600p and said it was cause it was on the xbox and thats why cod4 did 600 p and not a true hd res, they came to that conclusion because halo 3 works in 640p....with this dmc4 the ps3 is the lead sku and it still a lower res like in halo 3 and cod4....so cows can't blame the xbox...sorry my grammer sucked in that early post.



That whole five line post was a single sentence :|

Sorry, but I really don't understand what you said...
Avatar image for user_nat
user_nat

3130

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#33 user_nat
Member since 2006 • 3130 Posts
So seeing as no one could tell all these games wern't 720p in the first place.. doesn't that kinda suggest that HD as a whole is a lil over rated?
Avatar image for BovinesOnPaska
BovinesOnPaska

540

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#34 BovinesOnPaska
Member since 2007 • 540 Posts
[QUOTE="t3hTwinky"]I would be willing to bet that the PC version is going to be glitchy and terribly optimised.Taalon


Not to mention the controls would suck. Lost Planet PC port anyone?



PC version can use the xbox360 controller.
Avatar image for Taz-Bone
Taz-Bone

1388

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#35 Taz-Bone
Member since 2004 • 1388 Posts

Link?

And I play on an SD TV anyway.

Avatar image for Always-Honest
Always-Honest

11261

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#36 Always-Honest
Member since 2007 • 11261 Posts

teh 1080P at 60fps....

some still say that all games are true native 1080P on pS3 because it's on the back of the box. (yep, a lot of people)

Avatar image for deactivated-5c25ed127ff1d
deactivated-5c25ed127ff1d

995

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#37 deactivated-5c25ed127ff1d
Member since 2006 • 995 Posts
It still looks good, as did Halo 3 [it was overhyped though]. I'd much rather have a stable 60fps in 1024 x 640 than 20-ish fps in "teh true HD".
Avatar image for skrat_01
skrat_01

33767

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#38 skrat_01
Member since 2007 • 33767 Posts
Got a link to this?
Avatar image for CossackNoodle
CossackNoodle

232

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#39 CossackNoodle
Member since 2004 • 232 Posts
i personally think they wanted to save time and effort. its not that either system isnt atleast capable of 720p they just want to release the game already
Avatar image for catlin_czirr
catlin_czirr

2545

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#40 catlin_czirr
Member since 2007 • 2545 Posts
I have Lost Planet on PC, and let me tell you the Dx10 features+1680x1050+constant framerate make it a WAY better version than the 360, also there is this thing called the "Xbox 360 controller for windows" you plug it in and it is fully supported by any Games for Windows game, Kane and Lynch, Crysis, Lost Planet, Gears of War, Bioshock etc. if you go to the options it even shows a freaking 360 controller!
Avatar image for mistervengeance
mistervengeance

6769

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#41 mistervengeance
Member since 2006 • 6769 Posts

i don't see how you could play this game with a m/k..

if you plugged in a 360 controller or something that's different, but i dont really see m/k working out for a pc game of this style.

Avatar image for LibertySaint
LibertySaint

6500

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#42 LibertySaint
Member since 2007 • 6500 Posts
[QUOTE="LibertySaint"][QUOTE="Udsen"]

So when Halo 3 is in 640p it's "OMGOMGOMGOMG NOT TRU HD LOL HALO 2.5" but when DMC4 is 640p it's "WHO CARES IT LUKS GOOD!"...?

Just saying.

Action-Gamer

thats what i'm getting at....

Halo 3 had bullshots and was compared to COD4, Killzone 2 and Crysis. So once again Halo was a victim of its own hype.

actually no if u look at those "bull shots" as u call them, they look like todays camera shots from the thetre in halo 3, so sorry no. ppl just hated on the 360 and xbox cause they hate something doing well that they don't enjoy, face it.
Avatar image for LibertySaint
LibertySaint

6500

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#43 LibertySaint
Member since 2007 • 6500 Posts

So seeing as no one could tell all these games wern't 720p in the first place.. doesn't that kinda suggest that HD as a whole is a lil over rated?user_nat

yes, devs prefer lighting, textures, and draw distance over hd apprently, who woulda thunk it? hehe yes, your right.

Avatar image for GnR-SLaSh
GnR-SLaSh

3021

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#44 GnR-SLaSh
Member since 2006 • 3021 Posts

There's no arguing, that no matter what they're running at, they all look incredible..

Avatar image for lowe0
lowe0

13692

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#45 lowe0
Member since 2004 • 13692 Posts

Consoles sure seem to be having some trouble with this whole "HD" thing.Zeliard9
It's the developers; the scalers in the consoles give them the option of trading some resolution for better visuals. A lot of people don't notice what resolution it runs in, so the devs trade a little for some effects that they will notice.

You can do the same thing on PCs, but on consoles, the decision is made for you. This is fine with me; I just want to throw the disk in and play.

Avatar image for skrat_01
skrat_01

33767

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#46 skrat_01
Member since 2007 • 33767 Posts
[QUOTE="Action-Gamer"][QUOTE="LibertySaint"][QUOTE="Udsen"]

So when Halo 3 is in 640p it's "OMGOMGOMGOMG NOT TRU HD LOL HALO 2.5" but when DMC4 is 640p it's "WHO CARES IT LUKS GOOD!"...?

Just saying.

LibertySaint

thats what i'm getting at....

Halo 3 had bullshots and was compared to COD4, Killzone 2 and Crysis. So once again Halo was a victim of its own hype.

actually no if u look at those "bull shots" as u call them, they look like todays camera shots from the thetre in halo 3, so sorry no. ppl just hated on the 360 and xbox cause they hate something doing well that they don't enjoy, face it.

I think that you are trying to use '360 hate' to try and justify Halo 3s faults.

Fact is it did not deliver the visual hype that it was supposed to have. Especially after that 'in engine E3 trailer', and the hype surrounding the game prior to its launch. I remember screeshot threads aplenty raving about the games visuals, and how 'fantasic the draw distance, lighting system, character model, 'expansive' enviroments' were.

what a disaster.

And for the record I bought the Collectors Edition on launch day.

Avatar image for BovinesOnPaska
BovinesOnPaska

540

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#47 BovinesOnPaska
Member since 2007 • 540 Posts
[QUOTE="Zeliard9"]

[QUOTE="munu9"]Link for the 640p part? Anyways, the console version looks great and play great. Oh noes! Teh PC version looks a little bit better!! That totally worth teh $400+ extra I payed for the PC over a console!!! munu9

You're right, gaming PCs are built for the HD.

GT5 and blu-ray movies say the ps3 do as well... still haven't given me a link to the 640p part...



GT5 isn't even 1080p native is upscaled.
Avatar image for skrat_01
skrat_01

33767

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#48 skrat_01
Member since 2007 • 33767 Posts

[QUOTE="Zeliard9"]Consoles sure seem to be having some trouble with this whole "HD" thing.lowe0

It's the developers; the scalers in the consoles give them the option of trading some resolution for better visuals. A lot of people don't notice what resolution it runs in, so the devs trade a little for some effects that they will notice.

You can do the same thing on PCs, but on consoles, the decision is made for you. This is fine with me; I just want to throw the disk in and play.

The 'mother companies' should have forced devs to be far less shady about it, and enforced these consoles being 'HD' - as thats one of their biggest selling points.

Even PGR3 and PDZ are paraded on the back of my 360 box for having 'full 720p visuals' when fact is they arent even HD res native.

Same goes for games saying they are '720p and 1080p' on the back - without mentioning that isnt even their native resolution.

Avatar image for HuusAsking
HuusAsking

15270

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#49 HuusAsking
Member since 2006 • 15270 Posts

And even when a game claims to be 1080p, it may not be full 1080p...which according to the spec means 1920x1080p@60Hz. Both consoles have games that are guilty of resolution cheating (360 tends to do vertical cheating, PS3 horizontal) because the hardware that is in these machines just isn't cut out for handling 1080 full on with full effects. Not only isn't there enough memory to handle it, but the graphics chipsets are severely underpowered.
Avatar image for sirk1264
sirk1264

6242

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 12

User Lists: 0

#50 sirk1264
Member since 2003 • 6242 Posts
[QUOTE="LibertySaint"][QUOTE="Action-Gamer"][QUOTE="LibertySaint"][QUOTE="Udsen"]

So when Halo 3 is in 640p it's "OMGOMGOMGOMG NOT TRU HD LOL HALO 2.5" but when DMC4 is 640p it's "WHO CARES IT LUKS GOOD!"...?

Just saying.

skrat_01

thats what i'm getting at....

Halo 3 had bullshots and was compared to COD4, Killzone 2 and Crysis. So once again Halo was a victim of its own hype.

actually no if u look at those "bull shots" as u call them, they look like todays camera shots from the thetre in halo 3, so sorry no. ppl just hated on the 360 and xbox cause they hate something doing well that they don't enjoy, face it.

I think that you are trying to use '360 hate' to try and justify Halo 3s faults.

Fact is it did not deliver the visual hype that it was supposed to have. Especially after that 'in engine E3 trailer', and the hype surrounding the game prior to its launch. I remember screeshot threads aplenty raving about the games visuals, and how 'fantasic the draw distance, lighting system, character model, 'expansive' enviroments' were.

what a disaster.

And for the record I bought the Collectors Edition on launch day.

With the exception of jaggies and mediocre character models, Halo 3 has some of the best lighting on a console and detailed environments. At least on my TV they look detailed.