Click here for the screenshots. I must say myself they looked very impressive. Well this is a sneak peak at next generation of gaming now I can't wait for it!
I hate these sorts of pictures! DX10 is able to do those pictures too, I mean they're only 3d pictures so far. Every time they release a new version of DirectX they are followed by a ****load of crazy videos that show of what the technology can do but the reality is that games can't run like that with everything else going on too.
I hate these sorts of pictures! DX10 is able to do those pictures too, I mean they're only 3d pictures so far. Every time they release a new version of DirectX they are followed by a ****load of crazy videos that show of what the technology can do but the reality is that games can't run like that with everything else going on too. Blommen
Sony fanboys will say that ps3 is going to be able to render that kind of graphics.McdonaIdsGuy
Those are obvious bullshots. They've got raytracing and an almost stupid poly count. "This looks CGI quality to me." That's because it is CGI. The only thing that separates CGI from real gameplay is that gameplay is rendered in real-time. These images were not rendered in real time with a smooth framerate, animated and lit with that caliber of visuals. If it isn't obvious to you, exercise some skepticism and move on. What is Microsoft rendering this on? A quad 9800 GTX with 8 gigs of RAM and dual quad-core processors? Or is it just the magic of the new Windows OS? Give me a frickin' break. The hardware doesn't exist to do this in real time and their software is a joke. Direct X 10 was promised to have something like 50% better performance than DX9 and look infinitely better. It has WORSE performance, by a considerable margin, and it's got visuals that are directly comparable to DX9 frame for frame. This is either a trick by an obscure website or more Microsoft hot air.
[QUOTE="McdonaIdsGuy"]Sony fanboys will say that ps3 is going to be able to render that kind of graphics.BobHipJames
Those are obvious bullshots. They've got raytracing and an almost stupid poly count. "This looks CGI quality to me." That's because it is CGI. The only thing that separates CGI from real gameplay is that gameplay is rendered in real-time. These images were not rendered in real time with a smooth framerate, animated and lit with that caliber of visuals. If it isn't obvious to you, exercise some skepticism and move on. What is Microsoft rendering this on? A quad 9800 GTX with 8 gigs of RAM and dual quad-core processors? Or is it just the magic of the new Windows OS? Give me a frickin' break. The hardware doesn't exist to do this in real time and their software is a joke. Direct X 10 was promised to have something like 50% better performance than DX9 and look infinitely better. It has WORSE performance, by a considerable margin, and it's got visuals that are directly comparable to DX9 frame for frame. This is either a trick by an obscure website or more Microsoft hot air. Still even with crappy performance ps3 games wont ever match crysis level of detail.
[QUOTE="FirstDiscovery"][QUOTE="McdonaIdsGuy"]Sony fanboys will say that ps3 is going to be able to render that kind of graphics.Koalakommander
I lold hard:lol: Its because of the Blu-Ray remember! did you really lol? that's quite a sense of humor you got there. Meanwhile DX11 magically improves performance to such a degree that they're able to include realismx1000 mod packaged in with every game. I thought the new Windows was going to have the same kernel as Vista...what gives?
[QUOTE="BobHipJames"][QUOTE="McdonaIdsGuy"]Sony fanboys will say that ps3 is going to be able to render that kind of graphics.McdonaIdsGuy
Those are obvious bullshots. They've got raytracing and an almost stupid poly count. "This looks CGI quality to me." That's because it is CGI. The only thing that separates CGI from real gameplay is that gameplay is rendered in real-time. These images were not rendered in real time with a smooth framerate, animated and lit with that caliber of visuals. If it isn't obvious to you, exercise some skepticism and move on. What is Microsoft rendering this on? A quad 9800 GTX with 8 gigs of RAM and dual quad-core processors? Or is it just the magic of the new Windows OS? Give me a frickin' break. The hardware doesn't exist to do this in real time and their software is a joke. Direct X 10 was promised to have something like 50% better performance than DX9 and look infinitely better. It has WORSE performance, by a considerable margin, and it's got visuals that are directly comparable to DX9 frame for frame. This is either a trick by an obscure website or more Microsoft hot air. Still even with crappy performance ps3 games wont ever match crysis level of detail. Sure, I'm arguing for PERSPECTIVE, here, and I'll stand right there with you on that. I'll even say that PC is the best gaming platform and that I prefer it infinitely to my Playstation 3, even though my PC can't match up most of the time to what my PS3 is capable of. Mods, maps, and mania. Dystopia and Warcraft 3. Not exactly the best looking games but there's nothing like PC gaming. Now stop accusing me of being a fanboy and exercise your skepticism. I swear, people fall for anything on forums it seems. What happened to "pics or it didn't happen"?
[QUOTE="BobHipJames"][QUOTE="McdonaIdsGuy"]Sony fanboys will say that ps3 is going to be able to render that kind of graphics.McdonaIdsGuy
Those are obvious bullshots. They've got raytracing and an almost stupid poly count. "This looks CGI quality to me." That's because it is CGI. The only thing that separates CGI from real gameplay is that gameplay is rendered in real-time. These images were not rendered in real time with a smooth framerate, animated and lit with that caliber of visuals. If it isn't obvious to you, exercise some skepticism and move on. What is Microsoft rendering this on? A quad 9800 GTX with 8 gigs of RAM and dual quad-core processors? Or is it just the magic of the new Windows OS? Give me a frickin' break. The hardware doesn't exist to do this in real time and their software is a joke. Direct X 10 was promised to have something like 50% better performance than DX9 and look infinitely better. It has WORSE performance, by a considerable margin, and it's got visuals that are directly comparable to DX9 frame for frame. This is either a trick by an obscure website or more Microsoft hot air. Still even with crappy performance ps3 games wont ever match crysis level of detail.
What did any of what Bob said have to do with PS3 games and Crysis?
Windows 7 :( How 'bout the Optomize Vista first then worry about another windows format latter! my startup load is about 5-7 mintues... Windows XP was 1-2 I'll pass...
[QUOTE="Shattered007"]Windows 7 :( How 'bout the Optomize Vista first then worry about another windows format latter! my startup load is about 5-7 mintues... Windows XP was 1-2 I'll pass... My (admittedly very dim) understanding is that Windows 7 IS Vista, with the same kernel. And they're trying to specifically speed up startup loads. Basically, many of the processes (there are something like 120) that start up along with the system are going to be optional.
Sure, I'm arguing for PERSPECTIVE, here, and I'll stand right there with you on that. I'll even say that PC is the best gaming platform and that I prefer it infinitely to my Playstation 3, even though my PC can't match up most of the time to what my PS3 is capable of. Mods, maps, and mania. Dystopia and Warcraft 3. Not exactly the best looking games but there's nothing like PC gaming. Now stop accusing me of being a fanboy and exercise your skepticism. I swear, people fall for anything on forums it seems. What happened to "pics or it didn't happen"?BobHipJames
Your ps3 aint running a heavy OS and many other programs at the same time,and most of the ps3 games are sub HD and 720p 30fps...and when did i call u fanboy or something :? ?.
[QUOTE="BobHipJames"]Sure, I'm arguing for PERSPECTIVE, here, and I'll stand right there with you on that. I'll even say that PC is the best gaming platform and that I prefer it infinitely to my Playstation 3, even though my PC can't match up most of the time to what my PS3 is capable of. Mods, maps, and mania. Dystopia and Warcraft 3. Not exactly the best looking games but there's nothing like PC gaming. Now stop accusing me of being a fanboy and exercise your skepticism. I swear, people fall for anything on forums it seems. What happened to "pics or it didn't happen"?McdonaIdsGuy
Your ps3 aint running a heavy OS and many other programs at the same time,and most of the ps3 games are sub HD and 720p 30fps...and when did i call u fanboy or something :? ?. Most of them are sub HD? Would you like to compile a list to substantiate that ridiculous claim? As far as having a heavy OS: that's the point. Microsoft manufactures bloatware. If we could game on Linux PCs, our games would run smoother on PCs with the same hardware as consoles.
[QUOTE="Shattered007"]Windows 7 :( How 'bout the Optomize Vista first then worry about another windows format latter! my startup load is about 5-7 mintues... Windows XP was 1-2 I'll pass...BobHipJames
My (admittedly very dim) understanding is that Windows 7 IS Vista, with the same kernel. And they're trying to specifically speed up startup loads. Basically, many of the processes (there are something like 120) that start up along with the system are going to be optional. Ya, that's correct. When windows 7 comes out, it will be 100% backwards compatible (including all drivers) with vista, and most likely from this point forward, now that they've built it modularized. Thats what makes vista so different than XP also, technically the last problematic upgrade (we hope). Thos pics could never be run on any hardware available right now, with 30fps or even 10fps realtime.
[QUOTE="BobHipJames"][QUOTE="Shattered007"]Windows 7 :( How 'bout the Optomize Vista first then worry about another windows format latter! my startup load is about 5-7 mintues... Windows XP was 1-2 I'll pass...Phazevariance
My (admittedly very dim) understanding is that Windows 7 IS Vista, with the same kernel. And they're trying to specifically speed up startup loads. Basically, many of the processes (there are something like 120) that start up along with the system are going to be optional. Ya, that's correct. When windows 7 comes out, it will be 100% backwards compatible (including all drivers) with vista, and most likely from this point forward, now that they've built it modularized. Thats what makes vista so different than XP also, technically the last problematic upgrade (we hope). Thos pics could never be run on any hardware available right now, with 30fps or even 10fps realtime.So does that mean this is a stand alone update for vista or the predicessor of Vista?
Why is PS3 being brought up in this thread? It isn't like 360 can handle it. Consoles don't compare to PC. So why is everybody singling out PS3. Might as well mention 360 as well. That picture of Joker looked insane!
[QUOTE="Phazevariance"][QUOTE="BobHipJames"] My (admittedly very dim) understanding is that Windows 7 IS Vista, with the same kernel. And they're trying to specifically speed up startup loads. Basically, many of the processes (there are something like 120) that start up along with the system are going to be optional.Shattered007
Ya, that's correct. When windows 7 comes out, it will be 100% backwards compatible (including all drivers) with vista, and most likely from this point forward, now that they've built it modularized. Thats what makes vista so different than XP also, technically the last problematic upgrade (we hope). Thos pics could never be run on any hardware available right now, with 30fps or even 10fps realtime.So does that mean this is a stand alone update for vista or the predicessor of Vista? The prefix "pre" means before. Predecessor means it came first, whereas successor means it comes after.
Why is PS3 being brought up in this thread? It isn't like 360 can handle it. Consoles don't compare to PC. So why is everybody singling out PS3. Might as well mention 360 as well. That picture of Joker looked insane!MetalRX78
Probably because a lot of cows often say that the PS3 still has a lot of untapped power and that it will eventually produce graphics like nothing else on the market.
Why is PS3 being brought up in this thread? It isn't like 360 can handle it. Consoles don't compare to PC. So why is everybody singling out PS3. Might as well mention 360 as well. That picture of Joker looked insane!MetalRX78
What a great idea Microsoft, because Vista and DX10 just worked out so very great.
Â
t3hTwinky
And if we all stopped progressing forward with technology because something didn't work exactly as planned the first time where would we be? Back in the stone age!
[QUOTE="MetalRX78"]Why is PS3 being brought up in this thread? It isn't like 360 can handle it. Consoles don't compare to PC. So why is everybody singling out PS3. Might as well mention 360 as well. That picture of Joker looked insane!Can-o-Mark
Probably because a lot of cows often say that the PS3 still has a lot of untapped power and that it will eventually produce graphics like nothing else on the market. No one says that any more. What drives me crazy is when people deny that the Cell processor has a massive peak performance, which is at once obvious and easy to demonstrate. Just stop trying to make everything one-dimensional.
What a great idea Microsoft, because Vista and DX10 just worked out so very great.
Â
Zenkuso
And if we all stopped progressing forward with technology because something didn't work exactly as planned the first time where would we be? Back in the stone age! Actually, if Microsoft never took off, we'd be a hell of a lot better off. Some ideas never "progress," they just wallow in their own muck. You will recall that Vista actually requires HIGHER technical specifications (much higher) to run the same game with lower performance.
What a great idea Microsoft, because Vista and DX10 just worked out so very great.
Â
BobHipJames
And if we all stopped progressing forward with technology because something didn't work exactly as planned the first time where would we be? Back in the stone age! Actually, if Microsoft never took off, we'd be a hell of a lot better off. If they never took off we'd have someone else in there place, its that simple.
[QUOTE="Zenkuso"][QUOTE="BobHipJames"][QUOTE="Zenkuso"] And if we all stopped progressing forward with technology because something didn't work exactly as planned the first time where would we be? Back in the stone age! Actually, if Microsoft never took off, we'd be a hell of a lot better off. If they never took off we'd have someone else in there place, its that simple. What do you mean by that, we'd have another Vista gobbling up system resources? More hard disc corruption, crappy file systems, viruses, security holes, bugs, absurd amounts of processes in the background, ridiculous revenue generating schemes, monopolization.....? All I want is Linux, damn it. And by the way the only legitimate commercial competitor to Microsoft was and is Macintosh, and they suck so bad they wouldn't even be able to take as much market share as Microsoft was able to.
wow thats amazing! i just hope the card i have now can do dx 11 hahaJetB1ackNewYear
Of course it can. Microsoft would hate for you to have to spend money.
They're busy working their wizardry to make sure that your graphics card can do more than it's actually physically capable of doing just so you can tell your friends how "bomb" the new Windows is. Mojave, ****!
Click here for the screenshots. I must say myself they looked very impressive. Well this is a sneak peak at next generation of gaming now I can't wait for it!jakarai
Refer to http://www.tgdaily.com/content/view/38145/135/
Real time raytracing Transformers movie trailers on ATI Radeon HD 2900/3800. Ruby demo from http://uk.youtube.com/watch?v=aT37b2QjkZc
 Besides is too early for dx11 since no game that utilizes the full capabilities of dx10 appeared ( the only game that does extensive use of dx10 capabilities is Crysis and even there there is a lot of room for improvement )
 Besides is too early for dx11 since no game that utilizes the full capabilities of dx10 appeared ( the only game that does extensive use of dx10 capabilities is Crysis and even there there is a lot of room for improvement )
adamosmaki
Is it just me or does that link just say "these images are fake"
Log in to comment