Counter Strike: Source > Modern Warfare 2.

[QUOTE="SLIisaownsystem"]

[QUOTE="Arach666"]

It goes like this to me;

CS 1.6»»»CS source»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»MW2.

Juggernaut140

cs 1.6 is so old srly let it die and move on, just play cod4 and set the perk to shooting throw walls. The graphics are too old, some games have style like sc or wc3 but cs 1.6 is ugly.

Agree with TC!

Also CS1.5>CS:S>CS1.6>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>MW2

[QUOTE="Eddie-Vedder"][QUOTE="mr-sheep"] You serious? CS:S is the still the 2nd most played game on Steam and on Xfire I think it's still #1.andrewt1187

Yeah, it probably would get a 7.5 because it doesn't have a carrot dangling in front of gamers 24/7. It also has a plethora is meticulously balanced guns and recoil. Peeps just can't handle that stuff now.

Then again I remember how every decent server banned the awp after a short while...

Yeah COD has nothing on CS

I have 820hrs of CSS since 2004, I have 12 hrs of MW2... it sucks.

Yeah, no other online shooter has had me playing for longer. While I love Uncharted 2, Killzone 2, RSV2, and a slew of other online shooters. I can always go back to CSS and have some fun and get into it again.

I might not be as good as I once was or even close but its still a lot of fun to play still.

[QUOTE="campzor"]its true that cs:s > Mw2 but cs1.6 > cs:s ;)GhoX

GUYS it's been a few months since MW2 came out and DAMN I am getting bored of it... Counter Strike: Source on the other hand... I've been playin that ish for a good six years now and effin blows Infinity Ward's piece of turd away.

THE THREAD TITLE IS THE TRUTH.

mr-sheep

CS to me is more like run and gun. First to pop the other in the head wins.

CS to me is more like run and gun. First to pop the other in the head wins.

djestar

I haven't played every single multi-player FPS out there but CS is the best multi-player FPS out of all the ones I have played.

[QUOTE="GhoX"][QUOTE="campzor"]its true that cs:s > Mw2 but cs1.6 > cs:s ;)PandaBear86

I love the fact i can load up and get into a game of CS:S in less than 10 seconds and start killing.

I only play Office map lol. Strange but its jus so addictive.

I haven't played CS in a while, & I have never liked Call of Duty's online MP. I don't really care about either at the moment, but I am looking forward to Bad Company 2.

GUYS it's been a few months since MW2 came out and DAMN I am getting bored of it... Counter Strike: Source on the other hand... I've been playin that ish for a good six years now and effin blows Infinity Ward's piece of turd away.

THE THREAD TITLE IS THE TRUTH.

mr-sheep

I agree, I also prefer Counter-Strike: Source in front of any other online FPS.

I love the fact i can load up and get into a game of CS:S in less than 10 seconds and start killing.

I only play Office map lol. Strange but its jus so addictive.

ajames_123

[QUOTE="Kan0nF0dder"]

CS has staying power because it's perfectly balanced, totally unforgiving and has a tangible learning curve. MW in general is balanced like 3 fat kids on one side of the see-saw.

kraken2109

Yeah its very balanced when winning teams get more money and losing teams can go broke. /sarcasm

And in what world is the awp balanced? how about the fact that only the desert eagle (and maybe the usp if you're going eco on the CT side) is the only effective pistol. How about the fact that almost everyone uses either the m4 or ak47 and the only smg thats useful is the p90. mp5, glock, famas, galil are all freaking garbage. I'm sorry but to call CS:S balanced is borderline ridiculous even though I used to play it religiously a couple of years ago.

At least with killstreaks in MW2 it's stupidly easy to take them down. One anti-air class = instant death for most killstreaks. If everyone had at least one anti-air class, killstreaks wouldn't even stand a chance. But noooo, people are too stupid to even think about that and constantly complain about getting killed by them.

[QUOTE="kraken2109"][QUOTE="Kan0nF0dder"]

CS has staying power because it's perfectly balanced, totally unforgiving and has a tangible learning curve. MW in general is balanced like 3 fat kids on one side of the see-saw.

Arjdagr8

Yeah its very balanced when winning teams get more money and losing teams can go broke. /sarcasm

And in what world is the awp balanced? how about the fact that only the desert eagle (and maybe the usp if you're going eco on the CT side) is the only effective pistol. How about the fact that almost everyone uses either the m4 or ak47 and the only smg thats useful is the p90. mp5, glock, famas, galil are all freaking garbage. I'm sorry but to call CS:S balanced is borderline ridiculous even though I used to play it religiously a couple of years ago.

At least with killstreaks in MW2 it's stupidly easy to take them down. One anti-air class = instant death for most killstreaks. If everyone had at least one anti-air class, killstreaks wouldn't even stand a chance. But noooo, people are too stupid to even think about that and constantly complain about getting killed by them.

Well the fact that there are 160000 players at peak times playing Counter strike source and Counter strike on steam and another 15000-20000 on xfire every day 10 years after its release ( i wonder how many will play MW2 after 10 years ) says a lotadamosmaki

dont worry about it, if mw2's matchmaking system is not shutdownin 10 years, i am sure there will be a lot ppl still playingcuz they cant afford to buy new pc to buy current gen games. I have many friends who cant afford to buy either new pc nor good HDTV + console, so they stick with old games like warcraft 3 and CS: source.

[QUOTE="kraken2109"][QUOTE="Kan0nF0dder"]

CS has staying power because it's perfectly balanced, totally unforgiving and has a tangible learning curve. MW in general is balanced like 3 fat kids on one side of the see-saw.

Arjdagr8

Yeah its very balanced when winning teams get more money and losing teams can go broke. /sarcasm

And in what world is the awp balanced? how about the fact that only the desert eagle (and maybe the usp if you're going eco on the CT side) is the only effective pistol. How about the fact that almost everyone uses either the m4 or ak47 and the only smg thats useful is the p90. mp5, glock, famas, galil are all freaking garbage. I'm sorry but to call CS:S balanced is borderline ridiculous even though I used to play it religiously a couple of years ago.

At least with killstreaks in MW2 it's stupidly easy to take them down. One anti-air class = instant death for most killstreaks. If everyone had at least one anti-air class, killstreaks wouldn't even stand a chance. But noooo, people are too stupid to even think about that and constantly complain about getting killed by them.

[QUOTE="Arjdagr8"]

[QUOTE="kraken2109"] QFTLookAnDrolL

Yeah its very balanced when winning teams get more money and losing teams can go broke. /sarcasm

And in what world is the awp balanced? how about the fact that only the desert eagle (and maybe the usp if you're going eco on the CT side) is the only effective pistol. How about the fact that almost everyone uses either the m4 or ak47 and the only smg thats useful is the p90. mp5, glock, famas, galil are all freaking garbage. I'm sorry but to call CS:S balanced is borderline ridiculous even though I used to play it religiously a couple of years ago.

At least with killstreaks in MW2 it's stupidly easy to take them down. One anti-air class = instant death for most killstreaks. If everyone had at least one anti-air class, killstreaks wouldn't even stand a chance. But noooo, people are too stupid to even think about that and constantly complain about getting killed by them.

TF2 is better i think

i play css sourece and every time i spawned i would be instantley spawn killed!

CS:S is preaty shallow outside of its well balanced gameplay. I guess it just doesent need gimicks like leveling up and **** So i doubt for people that arent realy hardcore gamers games with more gimicks > games with less gimicks.

[QUOTE="campzor"]its true that cs:s > Mw2 but cs1.6 > cs:s ;)GhoX

[QUOTE="GhoX"][QUOTE="campzor"]its true that cs:s > Mw2 but cs1.6 > cs:s ;)BigBoss96fs

Nothing new here. Any competitive online FPS that Valve has made is better than MW2 - TF2, CS1.6, CSS, DoD - and has more staying power. MW2 is just another arcade shooter like Halo, and its appeal only lasts so long.princeofshapeir

[QUOTE="princeofshapeir"]Nothing new here. Any competitive online FPS that Valve has made is better than MW2 - TF2, CS1.6, CSS, DoD - and has more staying power. MW2 is just another arcade shooter like Halo, and its appeal only lasts so long.SparkyProtocol

[QUOTE="GhoX"][QUOTE="campzor"]its true that cs:s > Mw2 but cs1.6 > cs:s ;)BigBoss96fs

[QUOTE="kidcool189"][QUOTE="brandontwb"]Okay, so what was so great about it? brandontwb

[QUOTE="kidcool189"][QUOTE="brandontwb"]Okay, so what was so great about it? brandontwb

[QUOTE="campzor"]its true that cs:s > Mw2 but cs1.6 > cs:s ;)roddollente

true. BUT...

CS 1.4 > CS 1.6

[QUOTE="djestar"]

CS to me is more like run and gun. First to pop the other in the head wins.

PandaBear86

Yeah but there is a difference. In CS, when I die its because I know ive made a mistake. The maps are really well designed so that I know most likely were my enemies are going to be and can form a strategy on what my next moves should be. In MW2.... Its just a mess, you are getting shot from every which direction there is no way to tell what to do. The maps are so open that its actually IMPOSSIBLE to defend your self or form any sort of strategy. And because you die so quickly that if you get shot once you are dead, so unlike in halo where the map design is a bit more open, you atleast still have a chance of killing the other guy, but in MW2 its impossible once the other guy sees you..You just run out into the open a shoot stuff hoping for the best

[QUOTE="ajames_123"]

I love the fact i can load up and get into a game of CS:S in less than 10 seconds and start killing.

I only play Office map lol. Strange but its jus so addictive.

mr-sheep